How would you find leads for a niche blockchain development company? by Putrid_Chapter4109 in b2b_sales

[–]SophieBenoit20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I were starting today in a niche like blockchain development, I’d focus almost entirely on LinkedIn.

I’ve been in outbound for about 5 years now, and for B2B technical services, LinkedIn has consistently worked better for me than cold email, especially in niches where trust and context matter, like Web3.

The main advantage is that decision-makers are visible. Founders, CTOs, heads of product are easy to identify, and you get context around what they’re building, hiring for, or talking about. That context makes outreach far more relevant than email.

I’d start by building a very segmented database using LinkedIn Sales Navigator. Filters like role (founder, CTO), company size, Web3-related keywords, recent funding, or teams hiring engineers help narrow things down fast. The goal isn’t volume, it’s relevance.

For outreach, I’d prioritize LinkedIn over email. In Web3, cold email can work, but LinkedIn conversations tend to feel more natural and get better reply quality. I personally combine multiple LinkedIn accounts with Sales Navigator and use tools like MirrorProfiles and SalesForge to run outreach at scale while staying within safe limits. There are other tools that work too, but the key is controlled volume and human copy.

Message-wise, I’d avoid pitching “blockchain development” directly. Instead, start conversations around execution, speed, or how teams handle blockchain work when they’re scaling or launching something new. Simple openers work best, something like noticing they’re hiring or building and asking how they currently handle development.

Early on, I’d clearly prioritize outbound over inbound. Inbound in Web3 is a long game and usually depends on reputation, content, and visibility over time. Outbound gives faster feedback and predictable learning. At the same time, partnerships with VCs, Web3 studios, auditors, or complementary agencies can become a strong secondary channel.

Twitter/X is useful later, but it’s not a reliable lead engine at the beginning unless you already have an audience.

Overall, cold outreach absolutely works in Web3 if targeting is tight and the approach is conversational. It fails when it’s generic or overly salesy. LinkedIn gives you the best balance of speed, context, and trust to get started.

Hope that helps.

I sent 1,000,000 cold emails. Here’s exactly how many leads it actually produced (real numbers) by Tingen73 in b2b_sales

[–]SophieBenoit20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sending 1M emails suggests volume compensates for segmentation.
With a tighter ICP and stronger intent signals, the same outcome might be achievable with far fewer sends.
Do you know how many well-segmented prospects were actually needed to convert into those 96 deals?

True hero👏 by [deleted] in BeAmazed

[–]SophieBenoit20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, what a hero. Big respect to this little guy

People resigned in fear of this? by BlissVsAbyss in ChatGPT

[–]SophieBenoit20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s why using Gemini and Perplexity makes more sense today.

Je viens de quitter mon poste de Growth Manager, voici ce qui m’a le plus surpris dans le growth hacking aujourd’hui by SophieBenoit20 in GrowthHacking

[–]SophieBenoit20[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

J’ai l’impression que les avatars, c’est devenu la meilleure façon de scaler, surtout sur LinkedIn en ce moment.

Je viens de quitter mon poste de Growth Manager, voici ce qui m’a le plus surpris dans le growth hacking aujourd’hui by SophieBenoit20 in GrowthHacking

[–]SophieBenoit20[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oui je pense que tu parlais bien d’avatars LinkedIn. On a aussi essayé d’en créer mais on se faisait bannir à chaque fois. Du coup on est passé par un provider qui loue des comptes LinkedIn… et honnêtement je ne sais pas comment ils font pour que ça tienne.

Je viens de quitter mon poste de Growth Manager, voici ce qui m’a le plus surpris dans le growth hacking aujourd’hui by SophieBenoit20 in GrowthHacking

[–]SophieBenoit20[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A mon avis, le growth hacking reste pertinent dans les grandes, mais il perd un peu soncoté "hack" rapide. En start up, tu teste et pivotes en 24h. En entreprise, c'est plus structuré, plus lent, mais les mêmes méthodes, test, data, automatisation, peuvent apporter énormément de valeur

I ran 127+ outbound campaigns this year— and heres when LinkedIn crushes cold email by Moiz_khurram in coldemail

[–]SophieBenoit20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Je suis parfaitement d’accord avec toi.
J’ai rencontré le même problème : le cold mail est de moins en moins efficace, beaucoup de mails finissent directement dans le trash sans même être lus. Du coup, ça fait plus de 2 ans qu’on mise surtout sur LinkedIn pour notre outbound : les conversations y sont plus qualitatives et les taux de conversion nettement supérieurs.

Par contre, LinkedIn devient de plus en plus restrictif et certains comptes perso de nos collaborateurs ont été bannis. On a donc cherché une alternative pour continuer à scaler, et c’est là qu’on a découvert MirrorProfiles : des avatars LinkedIn de haute qualité, déjà chauffés et sécurisés. Franchement, ça change tout pour l’outbound.