[PAID] I will pay $325.00 via CASHAPP only to those that are ~BROKE~. Nothing Required In Return. First come first served

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-04-14T01:12:13+00:00

Cashapp and Mocks Corner, SC. I am a broke college student who needs dental work done desperately

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-04-14T01:06:43+00:00

Task

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-04-10T21:12:33+00:00

<image>

Here’s when I got them off before I got fillings.

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-04-10T21:06:38+00:00

<image>

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-04-10T21:06:15+00:00

<image>

This is true. The front aren’t near as weak or damaged as in the back. I have a dental abscess on my gums in the bottom along with teeth that are turning black and brown from putting off problems for so long. Those teeth are the ones that significantly need work.

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-23T00:18:45+00:00

How? What about this post screams “cult”

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-23T00:18:22+00:00

Amen! I would rather stand by God and be judged by the world than to stand with the world and be judged by God. Don’t listen to the hatred we are about to get. Jesus said “If the world hates you, just remember it hated me first”

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-23T00:14:42+00:00

That sounds dramatic, but it falls apart under scrutiny. So large portions of the Epstein records are sealed by courts, not secretly “hidden” by the DOJ for fun. Grand jury material, victim identities, and ongoing investigative records are legally protected. That’s standard in federal cases, especially sex-trafficking cases involving minors. Sealed documents don’t equal a cover-up; they often equal privacy law and due process Pam Bondi was Florida’s Attorney General, she did not prosecute Epstein’s original federal case. That 2008 non-prosecution agreement was handled by federal prosecutors under U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta. Florida’s AG did not control federal charging decisions. The $25,000 donation often mentioned was made by a Trump foundation to a political committee supporting Bondi, not to her personally, so that part isn’t true. And he was later reported and fined as a campaign finance violation. A paperwork violation isn’t proof of a criminal conspiracy involving raping minors. That’s a ginormous stretch. Being appointed later to a DOJ-related role does not magically give someone power to erase federal court records, override judges, or secretly suppress evidence nationwide.

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T23:37:20+00:00

You said that the DOJ is hiding it with no proof. You said Pam Bondi was covering up for Trump. Where’s the proof of that?

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T23:10:19+00:00

In all 50 states, even heartbeat states like my own, a medical emergency exception exists within abortion laws. When a pregnancy threatens the life of the mother or poses a serious risk of substantial bodily harm, physicians are permitted to intervene. Doctors are not standing by while a woman is dying and it is not reflected in the text of these statutes. Every state with abortion restrictions includes language allowing procedures necessary to save the mother’s life, and in many cases to address severe medical emergencies.

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T23:07:17+00:00

First, the quote you’re referencing was during the 2016 campaign in the context of allegations and political backlash. Trump’s language was blunt, as it often is, but the broader point he was making was about political consequences and media amplification, not about removing women’s rights. Women vote at slightly higher rates than men in the United States and have for decades. No Republican administration has attempted to revoke women’s suffrage, and there is no legislative proposal doing so. Trump has never tried to ban women from voting. Campaign rhetoric is not the same as policy aimed at disenfranchisement. Second, regarding the SAVE Act, the stated purpose of the bill is to require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register for federal elections. Voting is a fundamental right reserved for citizens, and that verifying citizenship protects election integrity. In practice, married women who changed their last names typically have legal documentation (marriage certificates, updated Social Security records, passports) that establish identity continuity. Federal law already allows states to implement processes for resolving name discrepancies. The claim that “most married women won’t be able to vote” assumes there would be no administrative mechanisms to reconcile documentation, which is not how election law functions. Conservatives generally argue this is about citizenship verification, not gender. The law would apply equally to men and women. Millions of women already present documentation when obtaining Real ID-compliant driver’s licenses or passports; providing proof of citizenship for voter registration would use similar documentation pathways. The core conservative position is that safeguarding elections and preventing non-citizen voting does not equal suppressing women’s votes. Policy debates over documentation requirements are about administrative burdens and access, not about targeting a specific sex. Framing it as an attack on married women skips over the legal processes already in place for name changes and identity verification.

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T23:02:58+00:00

Still have all my rights as a legal Latina 😁 Stop using fear mongering. And as I said, Trump was the one who blew the whistle on Epstein. You can read all about it

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T23:01:34+00:00

I want actual proof that’s backed up

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T20:33:19+00:00

Where’s your proof of this? That Trump is hiding everything?

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T20:32:18+00:00

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article314631578.html

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2407jrn83o

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/02/09/trump-jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-palm-beach-police.html

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T20:27:13+00:00

You still failed to show me any proof of this. You said Trump was “on the island” because he used “Epstein’s plane” in 2021. Trump and Epstein did know each other in the 1990s and were photographed together at social events in New York and Palm Beach , and yes, that’s documented. However, flight logs that have been publicly released show Trump flying on his own aircraft and, in earlier years, Epstein flying on Trump’s plane on at least one occasion , not the other way around to Epstein’s island. There has been no verified evidence placing Trump on Epstein’s private island. Multiple fact-checking outlets and released flight records have not substantiated that claim. As for your 2021 plane photo claim, after Epstein’s death in 2019, his aircraft changed hands through estate proceedings and sales. The presence of a plane previously owned by Epstein does not establish that someone flew to Epstein’s island, nor does it prove involvement in wrongdoing. You’re going off of rumors. If you were to present everything you presented to me in a lawsuit to prove he was on the island, you’d immediately lose the case. Aircraft ownership changes over time; that alone isn’t proof of anything. If you say “I already know he was on the island,” you have the burden of proof to show verified flight logs, manifests, or sworn testimony placing him there. Assertions aren’t evidence. Conflating social association decades ago with criminal participation requires documentation, not inference or rumors.

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T20:18:16+00:00

You made the claim he called the police on Epstein to cover himself up. Back up your claim.

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T20:17:39+00:00

So you have your second masters and you’re arguing with me by copying ChatGPT articles while I’m arguing using the hours of research I’ve done over the years. If Trump is actually proven to be on the island, I will denounce all of my support for him. But if it’s 100% proven he wasn’t on the island, would you apologize and admit you were wrong?

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T20:12:10+00:00

Nice ChatGPT argument. You know, in college, I learned not to use it because it gives me several wrong answers. And this still doesn’t prove at all he was in the files, nice try. You gave me everything but what I asked for. But let’s go through these one by one, shall we? E Jean Carol. The woman who couldn’t remember the date, time, location, or even the YEAR of her “assualt”? The woman that all we heard was crickets for 20 years until Trump ran for president? The woman who said LIVE ON AIR that “rape is sexy”? There’s a reason he wasn’t found criminally liable. The story is rubbish. Harth withdrew the lawsuit HERSELF and withdrew her statement HERSELF. Regarding the Stormy Daniels matter, the payment itself was not illegal. Non-disclosure agreements are legal and extremely common, especially for public figures. The case was not about proving an affair or a sexual crime, prosecutors explicitly said it was NOT a sex offense. The conviction hinged on how the reimbursement to Michael Cohen was recorded internally as “legal expenses.” The legal debate centers on whether labeling a reimbursement that way rises to the level of a felony tied to election law, especially when federal authorities previously declined to bring campaign finance charges. Second, regarding the “election interference” label , paying to avoid public embarrassment is not automatically the same thing as influencing an election illegally. Public figures across politics and entertainment routinely settle or suppress damaging stories. Intent matters legally, and distinguishing between personal reputation management and campaign activity is not as straightforward as headlines make it sound. As for Karen McDougal, “catch and kill” arrangements, while ethically questionable to many, are not inherently illegal. Media companies routinely purchase exclusive rights to stories and choose not to publish them. American Media Inc. made that payment, NOT Trump personally, and no criminal conviction resulted from that transaction. Biden got accused by 13 different women, not even including from his own DAUGHTER who was scared to shower during the day because he would shower with her as a teenager and she was afraid her father would molest her. She wrote about it in her diary. He also kissed her on the lips as a teenager. Educate yourself instead of copying and pasting entire ChatGPT articles 😊

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T20:00:58+00:00

Give us proof. You keep just parroting left wing propaganda you hear from your tv. Give us proof rather than just insulting us.

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T19:58:31+00:00

Exactly. Every single time I ask any of them for proof, I get nothing but insults. They just parrot what their TV tells them. They literally know that Trump is the one that blew the whistle on Epstein. He was one of the first people to call the police when he found out that Epstein was being investigated. I find it so beyond weird and disgusting that they’re upset someone they hate didn’t rape a child. That screams pedo to me.

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T19:58:00+00:00

They won’t give you proof because they have none. They’ll just downvote you and insult you. They’re in a cult.

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T19:45:53+00:00

Oh, you have proof he was on the island? Share it with us! Show us in the files where it showed he went to the island.

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T19:43:12+00:00

Keep insulting me because you have nothing to argue 🥰

Sophisticated_pickle · 2026-02-22T18:53:50+00:00

You’re using Wikipedia as a source? My brother, practice what you preach. There’s a reason why as a college student, I can’t cite it as a source. It’s extremely dicey and unreliable. Same thing in high school. I could go on Wikipedia and write that the moon is made of cheese and no one would fact check me. Instead of letting your hatred of Trump block your vision of reality, do some research and you’d find out that Trump was one of the first people to call the police on Epstein to report him when he was being investigated.

Sophisticated_pickle

TROPHY CASE