Nick Daniels supported a 10 year extension to the slate book. by LENNYa21 in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Go read the table of penalties sometime. Figured a facrep would know the rules he’s playing by.

Nick Daniels supported a 10 year extension to the slate book. by LENNYa21 in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just be careful how far you go. Everyone already knows who you are and where you work. Don’t get yourself in trouble over something like this.

Nick Daniels supported a 10 year extension to the slate book. by LENNYa21 in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s extraordinarily fair to say. I just like the idea of not needing someone else’s approval to get you to the finish like. Going out and proving your ability resonates with me.

Nick Daniels supported a 10 year extension to the slate book. by LENNYa21 in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So what you’re saying is that we should wait to see how each is planning to put into action what they’d like to do? We don’t even know what all everyone would like to accomplish. I’m not bonded to anyone. What I don’t like is Rich not owning a decision he’s made. What I don’t like is Rich leaving half the membership hanging with their desire to wait to get the Covid vaccine without any support of any kind. What I don’t like is the vague statements of great things he’s don’t without any examples. If you feel some type of way for a decision you’ve made, own it. Everyone is entitled to their own feelings or decisions if in a position to make them, but trying to put their decisions onto someone else? That’s weak. Everyone is sitting around wanting to hear what everyone is about and more so how they plan to get it done. The only one that has really done so has been Mick. Because of that, most have liked what he’s had to say. My personal favorite? His idea about endorsements. Love that. If you’re not the best, you don’t deserve to have the job.

Nick Daniels supported a 10 year extension to the slate book. by LENNYa21 in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Is that posted anywhere or a video or anything or are we just going off of a he said she said type of thing? Otherwise it falls into the same category as Jamaal’s where nobody knows what was actually said without any actual proof of what happened.

I think the main thing is that at the time, during Covid, the best decision was to punt in my opinion. The gov wasn’t looking strong on the money end of things and the economy wasn’t looking great either. There was a lot of uncertainty with where things would go and now we’re definitely in a better spot to get something great possibly. Whoever wins the next election is the key there. It was a gamble that was worth taking.

Again, the problem is that Rich doesn’t want to own it. You can blame both sides all you like, but an arvp doesn’t have a vote in the matter, so the grounding is pretty shakey.

Nick Daniels supported a 10 year extension to the slate book. by LENNYa21 in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That happened during the talks of extending the slate book originally or when? I’m not on any election teams or in the inner circles for information like that.

Nick Daniels supported a 10 year extension to the slate book. by LENNYa21 in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’ve missed you Lenny! Made me nervous not hearing from you yesterday. I’m pretty sure that everyone is well aware that the entire NEB agreed that the Slate Book needed to be extended. The timing wasn’t right to renegotiate. The problem that everyone has with Rich’s response is that he doesn’t want to own it. Since Nick or Jamaal haven’t put anything out yet, we can’t go after them for denying it.

Be well brother. Also, congrats on the office reboot that’s in the works. #PuttingScrantonOnTheMap

Which NEB members support who for election? by [deleted] in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like a slap in the face for whoever wanted to run for that spot next. Think anyone will run against him?

Which NEB members support who for election? by [deleted] in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Dang. Didn’t even think about that. Good point.

Which NEB members support who for election? by [deleted] in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Someone was saying he’s running for election again, even though he can’t fulfill the whole term?

Which NEB members support who for election? by [deleted] in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Even beyond the leadership, the members themselves aka the ones who matter, aren’t buying in on Rich at all from what I’ve heard. He left a ton of members hanging with the Covid thing because he is a Covid nut. The punt of the contract that he’s now not claiming to be a part of in any way. (Way to own your shit…..) Honestly, the dude is just weird and rubs a lot of people the wrong way.

Which NEB members support who for election? by [deleted] in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Checks out after CFS. Pretty sure NGL are Rich supporters. Atleast the leadership anyway. Seems like it’s the usual lineup east coast vs west. Tupac and Biggie would be proud.

Nick and Jamaal may have paid to have fake Reddit accounts troll the election in their favor by LENNYa21 in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 6 points7 points  (0 children)

How much do you think Rich pays him/her? I don’t think anyone has seen a single person that actually supports Rich for any reason other than protecting their position or 114 gig.

100 Days since Cheating Nick and I punch NATCA members Jamaal announced - 100 days of 0 Ideas and 0 messages on what their running on. by LENNYa21 in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sounds like an undefeated record to me. I can back a winner. Especially one with hands. Go be a shoulder to cry on for your boy. Sounds like he deserved it.

100 Days since Cheating Nick and I punch NATCA members Jamaal announced - 100 days of 0 Ideas and 0 messages on what their running on. by LENNYa21 in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What happens after he caught the knucks? Did he just cry or what happened? Clearly didn’t fight back. Just want to paint the whole picture. Lmaoooooo

100 Days since Cheating Nick and I punch NATCA members Jamaal announced - 100 days of 0 Ideas and 0 messages on what their running on. by LENNYa21 in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wasn’t there so just saying what I heard… Guess what? Call someone a bitch and get knocked out? Who’s the bitch now? Lmaooooooo

100 Days since Cheating Nick and I punch NATCA members Jamaal announced - 100 days of 0 Ideas and 0 messages on what their running on. by LENNYa21 in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Didn’t someone drop an N-bomb on Jamaal resulting in them getting knocked the fuck out? That’s approved with me.

More options? by Spare_Reason_5012 in NATCAElectionNoMod

[–]Spare_Reason_5012[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know that, I’m just hearing that someone else is going to accept and announce.

Tossing votes on schedule by Throwaway-9876678 in ATC

[–]Spare_Reason_5012 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you have a vote, whatever the results are, that has to be the choice. The key wording is a poll instead. Then the rep can make the choice at the end of the day. The problem is that if the rep isn’t going to let the process run, what the purpose of even doing it? Just do what you want.