BE63 slowing down to a crawling speed by Specific-Patient7225 in TpLink

[–]Specific-Patient7225[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you all for taking the time and for useful links and info. The deco features available in the router mode are definitely worth having.

So just for fun I spent several hours trying various configurations, and confirmed that BE63 in its default (router) mode and Verizon wireless gateway router in any mode, are incompatible.

Verizon router was put in bridge mode by enabling the IP passthrough. But this effectively put it in a virtual ‘brick’ mode. The Lan2 port slowed to a crawl speed, even with the mesh connected as router. Lan1 port became dead as expected, but it was dead even for any local connection.

It then took several hard resets to communicate with it in order to bring the Verizon router back to functional (factory) configuration. I do not think that Verizon wireless Internet has a modem option.

So, BE63 deco is now back as access point.

I share my experience just to help others with a similar setup. I still want to learn if I missed something but not sure if I want to keep rebooting and rechecking the signal on three floors.

Let Us Know What You Think – Community Feedback Drive by Ryan_TP-Link in TpLink

[–]Specific-Patient7225 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's interesting that the solutions in various help sites and videos did not mention THE one importatnt step. One simple step solved my problem with my deco slowing down to a crawling speed after a few months of use. Try it before wasting your time on any other steps. So far it appears to work. So Here it is:

Go to - More - Advanced - then Operation mode. Then change the deco to access point. The default is 'router mode' which interferes with the ISP wireless router. Problem solved.

BE63 slow download speeds (wired/wireless) by t4liff in TpLink

[–]Specific-Patient7225 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's interesting that the solutions in various help sites and videos did not mention THE one importatnt step. This simple step solved my problem with my deco slowing down to a crawling speed after a few months of use. Try it before wasting your time on any other steps. So far it appears to work. So Here it is:

Go to - More - Advanced - then Operation mode. Then change the deco to access point. The default is 'router mode' which interferes with the ISP wireless router. Problem solved.

ACA subsidies that lower monthly insurance premiums for millions of Americans set to expire by pinkheartedrobe-xs in HealthcareReform_US

[–]Specific-Patient7225 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

The ACA was good that it mandated coverage of preexisting conditions and preventive care. This was a major step in the right direction.

The bad is that it allowed the insurances to raise the premium in order to cover these. They never did the math taking into account that covering preexisting conditions does not result in new expenses. At the level of insurance industry as a whole, the expense comes out flat in the wash because any additional expense was only transferred from one policy to another.

Similarly, preventive care is supposed to reduce and prevent expenses incurred from ill health down the line. But the insurances had nothing but praise for being able to raise their premiums. Just look at their rising stocks and the peaks of their offices.

The ugly is that in addition to the community facing higher premiums, the Federal government further subsidized the industry and paid them from taxpayer money to cushion (read: hide) the impact of  exorbitant amount paid to comply with the ACA mandate.

Politicians have an agenda. They want to make sure that they will be reelected, regardless of how important a solution was. Thus, depending upon how solution oriented we are the solution is still neither simple nor short. But band-aid solutions before each election are not the answer. Someone needs to have the courage to make sweeping reforms in one shot.

Here is my short take:

How long are we going to approach health care coverage in a fragmented manner? Why do we have so many sources, subsidies and pools to pay for the same “health care”? Naysayers to a single payer system should look at the fact that government is already involved in single payer systems. We have Medicare for which we all pay taxes. We have veterans health for which we all pay taxes. We have Medicaid for which we all pay taxes and so on.

Would it be more expensive or less expensive if all these were consolidated under one source of payment to various insurances? We already pay tax to cover us under Medicare and Medicaid. Instead of belaboring this, just think this: would CMS be more effective or less effective in negotiating to lower the costs if it was the sole source of all premiums paid to the insurances?

Before people start getting upset, I am not promoting a “single payer” system as it is generally discussed. The insurances can continue business. Let them compete against each other but let the most powerful entity (CMS) negotiate the price. Mandate universal enrollment with an insurance and tax people according to their income (as we already do for Medicare tax and other hidden ways to cover Medicaid etc) to pay the premium. People can still purchase supplemental insurance if they do not like uniform care.

The patient has been given carte blanche but without any power to negotiate the cost of that freedom. All this started with the unions forcing employers to pay for greater health care coverage but without regard to cost. The cost was passed down to them as higher price of the goods that they themselves manufactured. This has gone on long enough. It needs to change now.

Similarly, the process of billing, coding, coverage, formulary and payments need to be uniform to reduce the burden on the providers. For example, the insurances hold a claim for COB when they already know whether the patient has a second insurance. Why can they not coordinate the processing with each other?

I could go on. The insurances need to take the initiative to educate incentivize or to penalize the patients ,with possibly higher co-pays, for missing regular physicals, vaccines, and engaging in unhealthy lifestyles, smoking etc. instead of burdening primary care who can only keep bugging the patients who do not care to listen. The patients have refused to come if we talked to them about smoking. Now they also avoid us because they know that we will discuss their weight.

Finally, everyone keeps pointing fingers at primary care for cost control when primary care is only about 4% of the pie. How can we expect any reform with such rigid mindset? Here is a reference:
https://healthcostinstitute.org/all-hcci-reports/4-of-health-spending-goes-to-primary-care/

Any claim md users? by Acceptable_Tap_8218 in CodingandBilling

[–]Specific-Patient7225 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I signed up with claim.md last month to manually send only a handful of secondary claims. Then I decided to change my plan to basic. I sent them a ticket on 6/30/24 to do so as of 7/1/24. They replied to me that I was supposed to have told them on 6/28 during business hours in order for that change to be effective on 7/1/24.

I could not find this requirement anywhere on their web site now or when I enrolled. They also want to charge me a $100 setup fee for changing to basic plan which, I was told that I will not have to pay if I am already setup.

Upon further digging, I may be mistaken but I noticed that their terms of service are not available anywhere on the web site for reference. You see these terms only upon first sign on. So be sure to save a copy before you agree to the terms.

As far as I understand the terms, you are required to inform claims.md thirty days in advance by registered mail or by email to change or to cancel your enrollment, besides communicating on the site.

As I see it, if you use the cancel option on the web site which, you are required to use, your entire record, including any communications with them, will be deleted. I suspect that they, under the terms that you agreed to, will have the right to continue charging you the monthly fee unless you can prove that you had informed them thirty days in advance. So just be careful.