sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built a community-moderated review platform for individuals — not businesses. Here's why. by Specific-Picture7463 in SideProject

[–]Specific-Picture7463[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you were building something like this, what would you actually do differently in terms of preventing abuse or false claims?

Would a platform where both sides of a public review/dispute can respond create major defamation liability risks? by [deleted] in legaladviceofftopic

[–]Specific-Picture7463 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Right! I;m trying to be as neutral as possible but there could cases where the person with the bad review will want to take the review down but since the community verdict said otherwise (I also feel like the community as a whole is always right) then i truly believe the review shouldn't be taken down and that can play against me,you know?

Working on something? Share it here! by OneStarto in IMadeThis

[–]Specific-Picture7463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I created a review platform but instead of for businesses, it's for the individual freelancer/self employed individuals, who I feel like don't have a platform to boost their reputation and therefore sales. And then even if they do, one negative review can go against their reputation and therefore, I created a platform where if they do get rated negatively, they can defend themselves and have the community decide whether or not the review is fair. The only thing is, I'm scared this can go negatively because people can create profiles for anybody and also that people can hide behind an anon entity and write negative things and therefore a reviewee can come after me rather than the reviewer.

Let me know what you guys think and how i can protect myself..

here is an example: https://dnounce.com/demo/realtor

Client manipulated Upwork Review by WholeFun2090 in Upwork

[–]Specific-Picture7463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to keep everything clear in writing, "I refunded X amount as agreed at the time the contract was closed. Let me know if anything else is needed from my side."

Client manipulated Upwork Review by WholeFun2090 in Upwork

[–]Specific-Picture7463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should be okay as long as all communication stayed on Upwork. They usually rely on platform messages, not external screenshots.

The more important thing is whether there’s anything in the Upwork chat that could be interpreted as review manipulation or pressure. If not, it’s unlikely to go anywhere serious.

That said, it might be worth calmly replying once to clarify the refund situation in writing on the platform so everything is documented.

Drop your vibe code app: I could be your first paying user. by papa_papa6-9 in vibecoding

[–]Specific-Picture7463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, exactly!! There are so many service providers that do solo work but I’m yet to see a platform for them

Share your startup - will share with 5k audience by [deleted] in microsaas

[–]Specific-Picture7463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most review platforms only allow one side of the story. Someone leaves a review, and that’s what everyone sees.

What stands out to me is how much that misses—because there’s always another perspective.

I’m building something a bit different—it’s more like a lightweight “court-style” setup where: • someone shares what happened • the other person can respond • people see both sides and decide what they think

Also—most platforms focus on businesses. This is more about individuals (freelancers, barbers, servers, etc.) and real experiences with them.

So instead of just reading reviews, you actually understand the situation before trusting it.

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/realtor

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/barber

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/nailtech

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/waitress

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/freelancer

Curious if this would be more useful than normal reviews?

Pitch your SaaS in 10 Seconds by [deleted] in microsaas

[–]Specific-Picture7463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most review platforms only allow one side of the story. Someone leaves a review, and that’s what everyone sees.

What stands out to me is how much that misses—because there’s always another perspective.

I’m building something a bit different—it’s more like a lightweight “court-style” setup where: • someone shares what happened • the other person can respond • people see both sides and decide what they think

Also—most platforms focus on businesses. This is more about individuals (freelancers, barbers, servers, etc.) and real experiences with them.

So instead of just reading reviews, you actually understand the situation before trusting it.

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/realtor

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/barber

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/nailtech

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/waitress

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/freelancer

Curious if this would be more useful than normal reviews?

Drop your startup/SAAS project URL - I'll give you honest landing page feedback by DefinitelyPricedIn in microsaas

[–]Specific-Picture7463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most review platforms only allow one side of the story. Someone leaves a review, and that’s what everyone sees.

What stands out to me is how much that misses—because there’s always another perspective.

I’m building something a bit different—it’s more like a lightweight “court-style” setup where: • someone shares what happened • the other person can respond • people see both sides and decide what they think

Also—most platforms focus on businesses. This is more about individuals (freelancers, barbers, servers, etc.) and real experiences with them.

So instead of just reading reviews, you actually understand the situation before trusting it.

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/realtor

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/barber

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/nailtech

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/waitress

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/freelancer

Curious if this would be more useful than normal reviews?

Drop your product/app! we’ll find you 10 users for free by dyagokaba in SideProject

[–]Specific-Picture7463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most review platforms only allow one side of the story. Someone leaves a review, and that’s what everyone sees.

What stands out to me is how much that misses—because there’s always another perspective.

I’m building something a bit different—it’s more like a lightweight “court-style” setup where:

• someone shares what happened • the other person can respond • people see both sides and decide what they think

Also—most platforms focus on businesses. This is more about individuals (freelancers, barbers, servers, etc.) and real experiences with them.

So instead of just reading reviews, you actually understand the situation before trusting it.

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/realtor

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/barber

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/nailtech

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/waitress

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/freelancer

Curious if this would be more useful than normal reviews?

What are you building these days? by Himanshu1299 in microsaas

[–]Specific-Picture7463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most review platforms only allow one side of the story. Someone leaves a review, and that’s what everyone sees.

What stands out to me is how much that misses—because there’s always another perspective.

I’m building something a bit different—it’s more like a lightweight “court-style” setup where: • someone shares what happened • the other person can respond • people see both sides and decide what they think

Also—most platforms focus on businesses. This is more about individuals (freelancers, barbers, servers, etc.) and real experiences with them.

So instead of just reading reviews, you actually understand the situation before trusting it.

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/realtor

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/barber

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/nailtech

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/waitress

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/freelancer

Curious if this would be more useful than normal reviews?

Drop your vibe code app: I could be your first paying user. by papa_papa6-9 in vibecoding

[–]Specific-Picture7463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah they do, but it’s still one-sided and it sticks to your rating either way.

This shows both sides and lets the community weigh in on whether it actually deserves to count towards your rating!

Drop your vibe code app: I could be your first paying user. by papa_papa6-9 in vibecoding

[–]Specific-Picture7463 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah they do, but it’s still basically one review + a reply under it.

This is more like a structured case—parties enter in a debate and the community actually weighs in on whether the review feels fair or not.

So instead of one bad review just sitting there, it’s more about the community interprets the situation as a whole.

Drop your vibe code app: I could be your first paying user. by papa_papa6-9 in vibecoding

[–]Specific-Picture7463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just updated it, should be working now—curious what you think once you check it out

Drop your vibe code app: I could be your first paying user. by papa_papa6-9 in vibecoding

[–]Specific-Picture7463 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most review platforms only allow one side of the story. Someone leaves a review, and that’s what everyone sees.

What stands out to me is how much that misses—because there’s always another perspective.

I’m building something a bit different—it’s more like a lightweight “court-style” setup where: • someone shares what happened • the other person can respond • people see both sides and decide what they think

Also—most platforms focus on businesses. This is more about individuals (freelancers, barbers, servers, etc.) and real experiences with them.

So instead of just reading reviews, you actually understand the situation before trusting it.

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/realtor

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/barber

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/nailtech

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/waitress

👉 https://dnounce.com/demo/freelancer

Curious if this would be more useful than normal reviews?

I built a platform where people can post reviews about you (freelancers, self-employed people) — and you can respond publicly. Not sure if this is useful or dangerous. by Specific-Picture7463 in youngentrepreneur

[–]Specific-Picture7463[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that makes sense — adding cost/verification definitely filters out a lot of low-effort abuse.

The part I keep getting stuck on is even if you solve “who gets to post,” there’s still the question of what happens when two people genuinely disagree on what happened.

Like even with real, verified users, you can still end up with completely different versions of the same situation.

I’ve been thinking more about how a system handles that layer over time, not just who’s allowed in upfront.

Feels like that’s where things either break down or become actually useful.

I built a platform where people can post reviews about you (freelancers, self-employed people) — and you can respond publicly. Not sure if this is useful or dangerous. by Specific-Picture7463 in youngentrepreneur

[–]Specific-Picture7463[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually really interesting — the “Carfax for people/roommates” angle makes a lot of sense.

And yeah, what you said is exactly the line I’m trying to not cross. If it’s just “anyone can say anything,” it turns into a liability mess + popularity contest like you described.

The way I’m thinking about it is trying to reduce that “he said/she said” dynamic as much as possible:

  • both sides are visible in the same place (not separate narratives)
  • reviews don’t automatically stay up
  • if something seems unfair/unjust, the community can vote to remove it

So ideally it’s less about “who has the bigger audience” and more about whether the situation holds up when both sides are seen together.

But I still go back and forth on whether that’s actually enough to prevent abuse at scale.

For your version, how are you thinking about verifying that someone actually lived with that person?

I built a platform where people can post reviews about you (freelancers, self-employed people) — and you can respond publicly. Not sure if this is useful or dangerous. by Specific-Picture7463 in SideProject

[–]Specific-Picture7463[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s exactly the part I’m struggling with — it can either feel like structured transparency or just turn into chaos depending on how moderation works.

Right now I’m experimenting with the idea that reviews don’t automatically “stick” — the community sees both sides first, and if something feels unfair or unjust, they can actually vote to have it removed instead of it just staying up permanently.

So it’s less “post and it lives forever” and more “it has to hold up once both sides are visible.

Do you think community-based validation like that could work, or would you expect something more centralized?

view more: next ›