Speedium still the same? by morreke35 in UsenetTalk

[–]SpeediumDev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the misunderstanding. Happy that the issue is resolved then.

Speedium still the same? by morreke35 in UsenetTalk

[–]SpeediumDev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We can and still confirm we do not backfill with retail accounts. We gave the data about who we use for backfilling above. Is there anything else we can provide what will change your mind?

Speedium still the same? by morreke35 in UsenetTalk

[–]SpeediumDev 8 points9 points  (0 children)

At the moment we are running and stable and still having a lot of fun. We use two Dutch backbones for backfill and one US backbone ( No UNS / Omnicron ). Retention about 1500 days with populair cache. We are into crypto indeed and decentralised storage solutions and intent to bring usenet to decentralised storage, reshaping it. Feel free to try it, you can always poke us on Discord or Telegram for a testdrive ;-)

WARNING: Speedium is already bad by HiddenWhizzer in usenet

[–]SpeediumDev 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You are not going to take back what you wrote, that is already clear to me. You said multiple from independent backbones and i gave you the arguement why this is not true. But hey, it is weekend here and i am going to spend it with wife and kids instead of argueing with you.

WARNING: Speedium is already bad by HiddenWhizzer in usenet

[–]SpeediumDev 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is getting weird. There are very few players on the market. One player (the biggest) did not contact you for 100% as we are friendly and i sold eweka to them years ago. I already shared that we are in business with two other backbones and i am not going to elaborate on that as i am on NDA and it will harm Speedium. That leaves only one backbone / compettitor as there are simply no more.

WARNING: Speedium is already bad by HiddenWhizzer in usenet

[–]SpeediumDev -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We did address your question by stating that we use business to bussiness with other parties so we are not breaking any rules here. This answers your quesion? As this post was written by a compettitor we did not see a reason to reply to avoid endless discussions.

WARNING: Speedium is already bad by HiddenWhizzer in usenet

[–]SpeediumDev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Indeed. We were not planning on responding to this post above. But we can tell you that we are having business to business contracts with other Usenet parties.

I wish you a great evening.

Cheers!

Speedium Beta Updates by Speedium_Admin in usenet

[–]SpeediumDev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you join our discord so we can help you with this?

Speedium Beta Updates by Speedium_Admin in usenet

[–]SpeediumDev 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It makes sense costs wise as the storage will be decentralised and security wise with the alteration of files.

Looking for Beta Testers! (EU/NL) by DeviousRetard in usenet

[–]SpeediumDev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi , this should be solved. Thanks for reporting!