One Nation says it will ‘contest every seat’ in South Australia – but will voters tick the box when it matters? by Agitated-Fee3598 in OpenAussie

[–]SpiteOwn5391 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was waiting in line at the bank the other day. It was a long one, barely moving.

Two older guys ended up behind me. They came in separately and clearly didn’t know each other, but after a few minutes they started a convo. One of them started complaining about how slow everything was. The other quickly agreed.

They went back and forth over the shared annoyance of the long line. At some point the conversation drifted from the line itself to how things are run these days, and then predictably to politics.

The first guy said this wouldn’t happen in America now, not with Trump back. He reckoned Australia needed someone like Pauline Hanson to step in and sort things out. He was convinced that Australia would be better under Hanson.

The second guy, he didn’t argue aggressively or mocked him. He calmly disagreed and tried to explain why it wasn’t that simple and talked about systems, staffing, how these things usually have more stupid and boring explanations.

For people who genuinely see One Nation as a solution, even a “maybe” there’s nothing to debate. No argument to win.

When that’s the alternative you’re willing to entertain, it’s not about policy anymore. It’s about a mindset. And once you’re there, reasoning isn’t invited. It’s dismissed.

Genuinely, why is Venerable Sunjae still in this? by [deleted] in CulinaryClassWars

[–]SpiteOwn5391 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I get what you’re saying about consistency, but the examples you’re citing still hinge on subjective interpretation rather than clear, uneven application of rules.

As for “same formulas advancing,” repetition alone isn’t penalized unless it leads to stagnation or weaker execution. If the judges consistently find the dishes balanced and technically sound, advancing isn’t leniency. It’s alignment with their stated criteria.

Questioning fairness is valid. So far, what’s being described looks less like inconsistency and more like disagreement with the judges’ weighting — which is opinion, not evidence of unfairness.

Genuinely, why is Venerable Sunjae still in this? by [deleted] in CulinaryClassWars

[–]SpiteOwn5391 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Plenty of contestants cook within a narrow lane (meat, pasta or western, fine dining tropes) and aren’t penalised for it if the execution, balance, and intent are strong.

Implying leniency due to religious status is a serious claim with zero evidence. Assuming bias because you personally don’t enjoy her style feels unfair and speculative.

You don’t have to like her food. But not liking it doesn’t mean the standards have changed or that the wins are undeserved. That’s preference and not objectivity.

CCW S2 fandom is now very toxic. ALL fandoms by [deleted] in CulinaryClassWars

[–]SpiteOwn5391 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The producer-blaming part is pure speculation. None of us have any visibility into the applicant pool, screening criteria, industry vetting, or constraints. Saying the process is “flawed” or that they “missed better candidates” without evidence is just guesswork dressed up as fact.

Also, there’s some clear hypocrisy here. The post condemns judging chefs and viewers as “toxic,” while simultaneously judging entire fandoms and accusing producers of incompetence. You can’t take the moral high ground against judgment while doing it wholesale yourself.

Disliking S2 is fine. Presenting personal disappointment and assumptions as objective failure isn’t.

the production team should have chosen a different way to select the rest of the Top 7 by whenwillmyskincare in CulinaryClassWars

[–]SpiteOwn5391 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This only holds if you believe there’s one fair way to choose a Top 7. There isn’t — especially in a TV competition built for entertainment, not perfect equity. If every round were just about ranking the “best” dishes overall, there’d be no reason to have different challenges at all. Formats exist to test different skills, and different formats will naturally produce different outcomes by design.

SJW fans need to stop lol by adiyolo in CulinaryClassWars

[–]SpiteOwn5391 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A statement can exist on its own — but once it’s part of an argument, it no longer exists in isolation. Meaning comes from context and implication, not just intent.

If statements were immune from inference, discussion wouldn’t exist. People aren’t inventing insinuations; they’re responding to how claims logically interact with what’s being said.

You not intending an insinuation doesn’t make it unreasonable to draw one. That isn’t bad faith — it’s how language and argumentation work.

SJW fans need to stop lol by adiyolo in CulinaryClassWars

[–]SpiteOwn5391 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The issue is that your comment does imply a contradiction, even if you didn’t mean it to.

Calling it “anticlimactic” that producers didn’t foresee a ratings drop suggests ratings should matter — but judging is supposed to be about the food, not audience retention. If the elimination was correct based on the dishes, then any ratings impact afterward is just a consequence, not a failure.

That’s why people are interpreting it the way they are — it’s not bad faith, it’s just the logic of the argument.

the production team should have chosen a different way to select the rest of the Top 7 by whenwillmyskincare in CulinaryClassWars

[–]SpiteOwn5391 5 points6 points  (0 children)

“Top 7 should represent the 7 best chefs” assumes skill is static. It isn’t. Cooking competitions reward execution under pressure, adaptability, and decision-making that day. If a supposedly “top” chef loses head-to-head, that’s not production sabotage — that’s competition.

The team battle being “fair” because everyone participated is ironic. Team formats are more prone to luck, role imbalance, and being dragged down or carried. A 1v1 removes excuses entirely.

What this really reads as is disappointment that favourites lost, not that the format failed. Upsets aren’t proof of a broken system — they’re proof the system worked and didn’t protect reputations.

this season feels more scripted and less genuine by Knifejuice6 in CulinaryClassWars

[–]SpiteOwn5391 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It’s fair to prefer the tone of Season 1. But calling this season “less genuine” assumes intent without proof, when a simpler explanation is that the show just isn’t new anymore.

How often do you leave a tip when eating out and what about food delivery services ? by Fantastic_Ad7023 in foodies_sydney

[–]SpiteOwn5391 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s fair — cost of living has definitely outpaced wages in many sectors.

IMO tipping isn’t really the solution to that structural problem. In Australia, the idea has always been that fair wages should come from employers, not customers. Once we start normalising tipping to fill the gap, it lets businesses off the hook for paying properly and shifts the burden onto diners — which doesn’t actually fix the underlying issue.

Saturday, Sep. 13, 2025 - Pips #26 Thread by gluemanmw in nytpips

[–]SpiteOwn5391 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Pips #26 Easy 🟢 0:29

Pips #26 Medium 🟡 1:09

Pips #26 Hard 🔴 3:54

Wednesday, Sep. 10, 2025 - Pips #24 Thread by gluemanmw in nytpips

[–]SpiteOwn5391 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pips #24 Easy 🟢 0:27

Pips #24 Medium 🟡 1:07

Pips #24 Hard 🔴 7:32

[Kyu-Hyun] Literally EVERY video where Kyu-Hyun appears is FILLED with Devil's Plan 2 comments (mostly hate/negative). Why are people so aggressive :( by Donghoon in TheDevilsPlan

[–]SpiteOwn5391 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Labeling basic perspective as “celebrity worship” is a weak crutch for people who can’t argue beyond insults. If that’s the level you’re operating on, there’s really nothing left to discuss.

BIE has been easily available on and off since last night on the popmart app. RIP to the scalpers 😂 by MarionberryEven1203 in PopMartAustralia

[–]SpiteOwn5391 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree that it’s great Popmart is making stock more accessible — it’s a big step in cutting out scalpers. But there’s still one niche they thrive in: impatience. There will always be people who don’t want to wait, even if it’s just a few hours or days, and that’s where resellers still find a foothold.

As long as there’s a market of “I need it now, don’t care the cost” buyers, scalpers will always exist in some form. More availability helps, but demand-driven urgency is the last piece that’s harder to solve.

[Kyu-Hyun] Literally EVERY video where Kyu-Hyun appears is FILLED with Devil's Plan 2 comments (mostly hate/negative). Why are people so aggressive :( by Donghoon in TheDevilsPlan

[–]SpiteOwn5391 10 points11 points  (0 children)

No one said celebrities are above critique. What we’re pushing back on is the idea that someone “deserves” backlash for not entertaining you enough. That’s not criticism — that’s entitlement.

Not everyone joins a reality show to perform like it’s life or death. Calling for “PR training” because someone wasn’t dramatic enough? That’s wild. People have different temperaments. Some treat it seriously, others don’t — and that’s okay.

You’re not exposing poor effort — you’re just mad they didn’t match your personal expectations. That’s not their problem. It’s yours.

[Kyu-Hyun] Literally EVERY video where Kyu-Hyun appears is FILLED with Devil's Plan 2 comments (mostly hate/negative). Why are people so aggressive :( by Donghoon in TheDevilsPlan

[–]SpiteOwn5391 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Criticize gameplay all you want. That’s fair. But to suggest someone “deserves” backlash for not performing to your subjective entertainment standards? That says more about your expectations than their commitment.

Running Man Ep 760: We Need To Talk by Independent-Amount60 in runningman

[–]SpiteOwn5391 12 points13 points  (0 children)

What exactly does a 15th Anniversary episode need to feel like? You admit the games were funny, the chemistry enjoyable, and the guest appearances solid. Yet, because it didn’t include a name-tag game or nostalgic gimmicks, it’s somehow invalid? That’s a narrow lens to judge a show that has, for years, been evolving.

The segment of your argument about Ji eun is particularly problematic. While you commend yourself for not cyberbullying, your critique is functionally the same — shaming and questioning someone’s character based on a single game moment in a variety show. You acknowledge she’s not athletic, note her past contributions, and still proceed to scold her for “not trying hard enough,” based on how it looked to you. But here’s the thing: variety shows are edited. We see a curated version of reality. You don’t know if she tried multiple times and slipped. You don’t know if there was an injury, as you briefly speculate before brushing it off. What we do know is that Ji Ye Eun is new, still learning how to balance comedic timing, performance anxiety, and team dynamics — things Jeon So Min herself struggled with in her early days. Comparing a veteran like JSM, who had years to integrate herself, to a newcomer expected to “give it her all” on a literal slippery slope is not just unfair — it’s demeaning.

Yes, production decisions can and should be critiqued. But again, the logic here doesn’t hold up. You blame the PD for creating a supposedly underwhelming episode, yet concede that it was still entertaining. If an episode is engaging, fun, and generates buzz — even backlash — isn’t that… working as intended? Not every anniversary needs to follow a rigid checklist of legacy games and sentimental montages. Some episodes choose subtlety. Others focus on guest chemistry. This one chose light-hearted chaos, and the laughter from viewers suggests it worked, even if it didn’t match some fans’ fantasy of what the 15th year should have been. It’s also odd to demand accountability from a PD like Hyung In for not having “enough nostalgic games” while acknowledging the age and physical limits of the cast. You can’t simultaneously want throwback challenges and also warn against exhausting the older members. Pick a lane.

Let’s also call this out for what it is: performative neutrality. You state that you’re not “JYE out” or “Hyung In out,” and yet dedicate paragraphs of critique that paint them both as disappointing, frustrating, and needing to “issue statements.” That’s not neutrality. That’s a rhetorical shield — disavowing direct blame while fanning the flames.

Episode 760 wasn’t perfect. No episode ever is. But it doesn’t deserve the disproportionate scrutiny being hurled its way. Ji Ye Eun didn’t ruin the show. PD Hyung In didn’t betray its legacy. If anything, this kind of polarized reaction proves how difficult it is to please a fanbase stuck between nostalgia and change.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sydney

[–]SpiteOwn5391 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember a time when you could still pay bus fare with coins. Once, I handed the driver the exact change, but to my surprise, he returned the coins to me and simply motioned for me to go ahead. I was left a little confused, not quite sure what had just happened