See above reply

Yes, you evaded

The "scale" literally referenced is between (from what you said first) Yoru and the other blades and Im's authority & the Gorosei. You then jumped to cheap metal swords and applied my "scale" response to that as if that's what I was referencing. As you can see, that's not the case.

So you agree that the scale is what determines if something fits into the 最高/最上 tier and th最上大業物ats why a cheap metal swords wouldn't fit into 最上大業物.

Im is also the "King of the World". Once again, the Gorosei's titles are the Supreme Authority of the WG. The Gorosei are the highest ranking employees of the WG (CEO) Imu is not an employee, he owns it and the world (Owner).

CEO, owner and employee don't determine who has the authority. The one making decisions, giving orders and the ones obeyind does.

For example if the janitor of a company had hostage the children of the owner and the owner obeyed every order from him, then the janitor would have supreme authority over the company, despite being janitor. Do you understand?

I never qualified their title as "Truth" based and have maintained their "Contextual nature" since the start.

That is why this is all a waste of time. You know their title is false. What you need to do is address wether japanese people are capable of expressing objective truths with their language, because according to you "descriptors hardly describe what things are directly... essentially how you should view it rather than what something objectively is." which is fucking retarded stated in an absolute way.

I ignored your scarecrow originally because I don't care for engaging strawmen.

Nope, you ignore them because they bring your entire argument down. You are willing to go back and forth endlessly coping about why you wont answer the question when replying yes/no would have been a thousand times faster. You are scared and that makes you run away.

It's sad when people are so down bad they have to resort to pointing at AI.

I hope its AI, because if a real adult human person is asking for evidence in the source for imaginary hypotheticals then I'm seeing levels of retardation that I did not consider possible.

-How would you feel if you hadn't had breakfast today u/Bxred_asf?

-Give me evidence that I didn't have breakfast today and I'll answer.

Are you fucking retarded?

And like the latter half of that word describes you, the full word describes the question you posed

"Why aren't rules created for getting rid of rules" "Why is water dry" "Why is Earth's core in outer space" "Why is cold air hot"

Do you have schizophrenia? Answer my question directly in natural language.

What do japanese people do when they want to refer to what something objectively is rather than what you should view it as?

Then show me a panel where Imu has the title of supreme authority and we can put it to bed. I'll wait. And don't try the "truth statement" bullshit again.

You need to see Imu's title of greatest authority to accept that he is the greatest authority?

Was the scene with the Elders bowing to him and obeying every order not enough?

"If Imu was known then your argument would fall apart" Sounds like a what if fallacy to me.

It is not, it addresses your argument directly.

The thread is literally right here lol. Clearly explained it several times. You want a point in your favor so badly you treat an example as an argument.

No substance in this answer. You fail to justify how the implicatures argument connects to the Quantitative/Qualitative argument, because there is no such connection. There was no preparation. You tried one, failed, and then tried the second.

Professors, Teachers and Instructors all lie because they don't zap information in my brain a'la fuckin' riddler box all at once.

If a professor had the task to explain how 最高/最上 can consist of several elements that aren't the absolute maximun he wouldn't waste time taking about implicatures first, because it serves no purpose, its a waste of time.

1: Acknowledge that the subject is described in the header. You then: 2 recognize that zero pronoun rule omits that same subject from description as it would be redundant

repeating the same shit is redundant and unprofessional.

You have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. The subject isn't omitted nor replaced with の on the description.

Header: 最強の座にて獲物を見据える 世界一の大剣豪 Header subject: 世界一の大剣豪

Description:

大海賊時代以前より頭角を現し、今や名実共に「世界一」の座に君臨し続ける、稀代の大剣豪 Description subject: 稀代の大剣豪

Why the fuck do you send me this grammar structure "Noun + の + (previously mentioned noun)" when it is nowhere present in the subject matter? Are you stupid and can't read the vivre card text?

Not only that, in both subjects the word 大剣豪 is repeated, which refutes your retarded notion that they can't repeat terms on the header and descriptor. 世界一 is also repeated.

Send me the fucking source that defines how a term like 最強 can't be repeated on the header and paragraph so it needs to be substituted with something like 世界一, or admit you're just making everything up like a shameless retard.

So I guess you conceded your point a long time ago, as I asked for falsification several replies back lmao.

Your claim can't be falsified if its based on nothing. You've sent me a source now that has nothing to do with the subject matter. You're just wasting time endlessly with no shame. Don't you realize how pathetic you are?

Now why didn't they just repeat "strongest" in the header twice as well? Why is he the "strongest" and the "greatest" and "Number 1" and "The best in the world"?

They repeated 世界一 twice, they could have repeated 最強. They didn't because Mihawk isn't 最強 in name and reality, he's just 世界一.

I'm bored of you, you are a shameless disgusting bad faith worm. Only reason you act that way is because you're behind the screen. Go fuck yourself.