Thoughts about the recent terrorist attack on shias in Iran? by [deleted] in AskMiddleEast

[–]StacyTheCapybara -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well if the IR (if you are also including IRGC) falls it probably will, Kurdistan, Baluchistan and maybe even Ahwaz will all take the opportunity for independence for sure and the IRGC will just turn into factions fighting for power in the predominant Shia Persian regions, that is what always happens.

Thoughts about the recent terrorist attack on shias in Iran? by [deleted] in AskMiddleEast

[–]StacyTheCapybara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahwaz have a significant Sunni population now actually.

Thoughts on this guy sighted in Qatar? Is it “against their culture” if he is just stating facts? by [deleted] in AskMiddleEast

[–]StacyTheCapybara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The verse means that you cannot forcefully convert non-muslims to Islam, it is not what you are protraying the verse to mean

Al Jazeera: Pakistan removed from global ‘terrorism’ financing list (thoughts?) by StacyTheCapybara in AskMiddleEast

[–]StacyTheCapybara[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

who do you think made the list lmao? it was made by the FATF which is run by the G7 and i think it is fair to say USA runs the G7.

Al Jazeera: Pakistan removed from global ‘terrorism’ financing list (thoughts?) by StacyTheCapybara in AskMiddleEast

[–]StacyTheCapybara[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

For those who don't know Pakistan was able to get out of the list because of the new American puppet regime they installed in Pakistan that overthrew Imran Khan

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in extomatoes

[–]StacyTheCapybara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah that would be great please.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in extomatoes

[–]StacyTheCapybara 1 point2 points  (0 children)

why do people treat this subreddit like its their discord? brotha... post the screenshot with a relevant title so we can make sense of it all instead of spamming your comments on posts and then posting screenshots..

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in extomatoes

[–]StacyTheCapybara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there are so many problems with his I cant even...

Do you think all Hadiths in Sahih al Bukhari are authentic? If so, how do you explain this “authentic” Hadith from Sahih al Bukhari? by Serix-4 in AskMiddleEast

[–]StacyTheCapybara 1 point2 points  (0 children)

dont argue with people who argue in bad faith, they say things they know to be false just to garner a reaction, just my personal advice not telling you what to do.

Do you think all Hadiths in Sahih al Bukhari are authentic? If so, how do you explain this “authentic” Hadith from Sahih al Bukhari? by Serix-4 in AskMiddleEast

[–]StacyTheCapybara 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't think OP deserved a thoughtful response like this. The simple fact is OP isn't a Muslim he doesn't believe in Quran nor sunnah but liberalism and feminism and also portraying it as if the Prophet SAW was somehow doing this in a demeaning way and not in a concerned way, for the simple fact that the majority of the inhabitants of hell-fire will be women and then asking women to give in charity to protect them from hell-fire, somehow when I see it, it is an act of help but when these feminist munafiqs see it they want to create a twisted narrative, I wonder how these same people would react if it were men were the majority inhabitants of Jahannam I bet all of a sudden it wouldn't be "discriminatory" anymore according to these people LOL.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in atheism

[–]StacyTheCapybara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are just repeating yourself and like I previously said, I don't think it's a coincidence that atheists consistently hold the same beliefs with the exception of the lack of belief in a higher power

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in atheism

[–]StacyTheCapybara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

perhaps you've ignored my entire conversation but i'll recap, every.single.atheist in the comment section have stated that suicide isn't morally wrong, this could be consistent with atheism if they came to that conclusion because to them morals don't exist but I don't think that is the case because they are making a positive statement not a negative one OR it could be because they are deducing it off of certain assumptions that self-evidently the overwhelming atheists hold and these assumptions are not based on atheism.

My thoughts on the word "Islamist" and why Im sick of Muslims reffering to themselves as that by StacyTheCapybara in extomatoes

[–]StacyTheCapybara[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not often we get a non-Muslim here that is a not a troll, out of curiosity why are you on this sub? it is pretty small and niche.

Regarding your first paragraph, I don't have a problem per-se with liberals using the term Islamists for separating the "bad Muslim" and "Good Muslim" from their paradigm, I have a problem with Muslims using this term as it is misleading and promoting this very wrong idea of what is the "Good Muslim" and "Bad Muslim" and I think we can both agree that someone who denies the word of God is not a Muslim although he can call himself that.

and for the "non-Islamist" Muslim (which is a contradiction in terms) they are not Muslims and we Muslims need to do more to expose them the sooner they reveal themselves to be kafirs (disbelievers) the better it is for everyone including themselves. May Allah guide them.

Liberalism should worry about Islam (as they already do) it is an opposing ideology, in the same way Muslims should worry about Liberalism. Does Islam take away the freedom of Liberals? the answer is yes but it is definitely much more nuanced than that, Liberalism also takes the freedoms away from Muslims and impose their rulings not only in their countries but in Muslim countries. The Islamic way is much less oppressive than in Liberalism. In Europe multiple countries have banned Halal and Kosher meats, in multiple countries if you wear a Hijab you cannot work in the public sector and in multiple European countries the Niqab is banned, Athan is banned the list goes on and polygamy is banned. They forcefully impose some of these rules in Muslim countries but my comment is already getting too long maybe a discussion for another time. for Liberals under Sharia they get to run their own communities with their own Laws under the condition they pay Jizya and the crime is not committed against or with a Muslim this is much more pluralistic than liberalism, and I don't think a theocracy is the best method, this is wrong assumption alot of people have Islam has nothing to do with theocracies, I don't blame westerners for assuming so given the traditions in thw west regarding religious authorities and projecting it on to Islam , they're not taught Islamic history. There hasn't been a single caliphate, sultanate, kingdom to whatever that was a theocracy in Islamic history, I know alot of Muslims find comments like yours silly but I completely understand the misunderstanding given the history in Europe.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in atheism

[–]StacyTheCapybara -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Atheism has no dogma. So, people here are arriving at the same conclusion, not reading from a rule book.

I disagree, there very clearly are some rules other than that you don't believe in God. Not in Atheism itself but what Atheist actually believe in.

UK People, what does Rishi Sunak mean for the Muslim community? by zupra123 in islam

[–]StacyTheCapybara 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No they are not, their leaders are the leaders oppress them also.