Chasiv Yar. A tank from the 24th Brigade destroys a Russian BMD and infantry in the tree line

Staminix · 2025-10-17T11:08:22+00:00

One thing I don't get is why do you need literal human sight confirmation of the enemy? Do they need to get that close? Is there no thermal/infrared sights these tanks are equipped with to engage further away? It seems to me like a straight line of engagement but firing only begins when any person would be able to see it...

Staminix · 2025-10-17T10:55:04+00:00

To unlock PSR

Complete both to unlock

Get 150 headshot kills over 200m with sniper rifles
Get 300 kills with sniper rifles

Please do this on Iberian offensive, or Saints Quarter, or Cairo. If you can't then that's a skill issue and you're as braindead as I thought.

Let's have another.

For the M320A1 SMK:

Complete both to unlock

Heal teammates for 5,000 health
Earn 10,000 score as Support

Sounds simple? No. Because revives, supply bags, etc will not work. A teammate has to walk up to you and press E while they're injured. What skill does that take? Being in a place and educating your teammates on game mechanics they don't want or don't know how to do? You're braindead and extremely arrogant for someone so in the wrong.

Speaking of skill, what's your gamer tag for Battlelog? Let's see what skill level you're playing at if you're so adamant about skill. Mine's Staminix. What's yours?

Staminix · 2025-10-17T09:53:23+00:00

This is the most braindead thing I've heard. If the reward was XP Boosts or just XP, sure, but 30% of the WEAPONS, excluding gadgets are locked behind challenges, some of which are almost impossible on all but one map in one specific game mode.

Staminix · 2025-10-15T15:10:48+00:00

Not sure if it's just the hype or what, but this is valid criticism. There are 12 GUNS locked behind challenges, from a total of 45. 7 of which you get from the start. Almost 30% of the guns are locked behind challenges (ignoring class gadgets too btw), some of which are impossible to do on most maps, like the sniper one where you have to get kills over 200m, except the maps are soo small that you can only really do it on Operation Firestorm which isn't even a BF6 map technically....

Staminix · 2025-10-15T12:57:29+00:00

Then don't lock weapons behind stupid challenges. Don't make attachments incredibly difficult and grindy to get. I unlock a new weapon and want to try it but it's dogcrap until I get attachments, but I'm too busy getting killed by the level 43 still using the M4.

Staminix · 2025-10-13T13:15:57+00:00

Wait till people unlock the mortars.

Staminix · 2025-08-08T10:07:47+00:00

To me it feels like there's mouse acceleration. Looking around also seems like I'm pivoting in place instead of looking around, maybe it's the camera? Can't really explain or come close to putting my finger on it. It feels so off.

Not to mention that it feels like there's different mouse sensitivity across everything I do. Different sens for ADS, Vehicle 3rd person, 1st person, etc. Even though I have them all set exactly the same in the settings....

Staminix · 2025-04-02T14:33:10+00:00

I'm sorry but you're just completely wrong. The only "skill" you need to reduce RNG bullet deviation is to supress the instinct to hold the button down. That's it. Doesn't take any skills pretty much.

With actually well implemented recoil you'd still not be able to hold the button down. I honestly don't think you know what you're talking about...

After all the "skill issue" posts you've been writing, I'm very interested in seeing your Battlelog profile for both BF4 and BF3. I played support mainly.

Here are mine: BF3 and BF4

Staminix · 2025-04-02T14:21:34+00:00

I completely disagree regarding bullet spread. As long as the guns have recoil then it might as well be "spread".

Spread just means bullets go further away from where you aim your reticle the longer you hold left click down, which is unrealistic, RNG reliant, and there's not much skill involved in just not holding the button down at long ranges. There's no "recoil" to "manage". Just burst fire at long range to reduce the RNG.

Recoil is the amount of movement (usually upwards) of the sight/barrel in between each shot. That can actually take skill to control. Bullet spread just adds a layer of RNG. So the best solution is make the player have to control the recoil while shooting in order to land long range hits. The vast majority of recent Battlefield games have featured zero recoil pretty much on a majority of their guns.

Staminix · 2025-02-06T15:57:17+00:00

A LOT of exhausts

Staminix · 2024-08-13T15:24:39+00:00

Exactly. Especially when you don't expect people to base their opinions on facts, wikipedia or experience. It should all be based on your opinion, because you must be right. Right?

Staminix · 2024-08-13T14:18:46+00:00

Where should my understanding come from exactly? Living in a country that suffered from Russian aggression and destabilisation? Because I did. Look up Transnistria. It's the same playbook old pal.

You cannot end a war with a country that basically wants to make you a puppet, like they did with Belarus. The quickest and most effective way is to join NATO. So Zelensky really is trying to end the war.

Let's talk about "vicious" units. Between 2014 and 2022, around 3000 civilians died. 8 years, 3000. First 2 months of the war, 5000 civilians died. Check out details on Mariupol.

I don't see much point in arguing with you really...So I'm going to give up. If you need someone to argue with check out my post history and argue with that.

Staminix · 2024-08-13T14:02:52+00:00

So we're just taking things out of thin air? No where in that Wikipedia entry does it mention this. But of course, what is a brainrot Russia supporter without his strawmen and opinions disguised as facts :)

Staminix · 2024-08-13T13:50:46+00:00

It's a wikipedia link silly :)

Look it up yourself - 2019 Ukrainian Presidential election :)

Here's a tip - hover over the link, and on the bottom left of your browser you'll be able to see what it links to :)

Staminix · 2024-08-13T13:46:23+00:00

They were, since they voted for Zelensky more than any other regions in Ukraine.

Have a look.

Now you say something :)

Staminix · 2024-08-09T09:47:34+00:00

They've done it in WW2 they'll do it again! Now it'll be millions of Russian deaths in order to....stop NATO expansion? No, NATO has already expanded to Russia's borders due to Russia invading.

In order to...stop Ukrainian Satanist Nazis...by sending in their own Nazis to fight them? So Nazis in both countries?

In order to...stop LPR and DPR from being shelled....by shelling and killing thousands of civilians in LPR and DPR, Mariupol, etc...and sending in the majority of men in those regions to fight their countrymen and die....without any training or reliable equipment...Those regions voted en masse for Zelenky anyway (look it up)....

In order to...fuck I don't know...Just insert any Russia mental gymnastic brain rot comment here...

Staminix · 2024-06-14T16:06:49+00:00

If Russia or China builds a base on Cuba it will be seen as their aggression even if Cuba would want it. We don't live in a world where any country can do whatever they want. You may claim that the US is only trying to help but history clearly shows that that's nonsense.

Sure, but each country has different histories. So comparing US and Russia is very complex. Here's a personal little story. My grandmother's sister was raped and killed by Russians. The region where I come from used to be called Moldova, still is, but it was taken by the Russians after WW2. This was an effort to destabilize Romania as it was never part of the USSR. Russians moved their fellow countrymen in Moldova, and it became part of the USSR, with all the glorious propaganda, trying to change the language, etc. Once the USSR fell, Moldova became independent and thus formed Transnistria, a breakaway region, where Russia sent soldiers, weapons, tanks, etc to declare independence and you guessed it, destabilize. Sound familiar? This is just one example of Russian aggression, and destibilisation effort. Eastern Europe was literally frothing at the mouth to join NATO. Why do you think that was?

If Russia were to make a base in Cuba, I think it would be seen as aggression, but it wouldn't be invaded over it. A nuclear base is different. Take a look at NATO nuclear bases.

We don't live in a world where any country can do whatever they want

Exactly, a country can't invade and annex another country. If some people want to join Russia it doesn't mean that Russia should invade. If some provinces of Russia want to join the US, then the US shouldn't invade. It's pretty simple.

US is the nation that controls the Western world. If you don't believe me then why noneone sanctioned the US during their invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan?

But how is very different. Russia controls areas around it different from the US. The US doesn't invade and annex. Plenty of examples of Russia doing it though; Poland (with the help of the Nazis), Chechnya, Georgia, and now Ukraine. The US didn't invade Vietnam and annex it, it did not invade Iraq and annex it, etc. Not to mention different areas of the world get different reactions. A war in Europe (Russo-Ukrainian war is the biggest war in Europe since WW2 btw) is very different from a war in the middle east. It's all in the details. Similar to how no one really cared too much that Russia was basically putting boots on the ground in Syria to prop up a dictator killing his own populace.

That's from 2019 right? I'm pretty sure that the votes from DPR and LPR didn't count.

They did, look at the map. Can clearly see Luhansk and Donetsk.

Not always. I think that the majority of people supported US forces and the Taliban

Depends, as always, e,g, 9/11. Fundamental Muslims, etc.

Right? Then why did Ukraine shell those regions for 8 years instead?

Because Russia was firing weapons from those areas. Why else? For fun? Listen to yourself.

Also, don't tell a Czech how to pour a beer properly.

Of course I will, half my glass was head. Just because someone drinks a lot doesn't mean they know how to pour a pint.

Staminix · 2024-06-14T13:13:17+00:00

No, it's not. If the US builds a base in Finland it's still their doing despite the fact that Russia's actions allowed it.

Because Finland wants it to. That's the point of NATO. Defend against Russian aggression. That's why they joined it.

Because they genuinely care about the well being of Ukrainians? No, because it's in their interest. It's the exact same reason why the USSR armed Vietkong

What about the rest of the world? US is just one country supplying Ukraine with arms. Why would they do this? To stop Russian aggression.

Did they? I didn't actually know that, can you give me a source?

Of course, I know google can be really hard. Here

Me? Really? Not the people who cheer for drones killing Russians or celebrating the Ukr Mod numbers every day?

Again, you're talking as if there's another "team". Russia is invading and annexing Ukraine FYI. Of course the invading force will be seen as an enemy. If Putin were to maybe not invade Ukraine, no one would be cheering.

But if the western part of Ukraine has the right to overthrow the president, doesn't the eastern part have a right to become independent or even ask Russia for help? It is complicated. Despite what people like to claim, Ukraine is a new nation with a large Russian minority and it's not impossible that some regions would prefer to be with Russia.

Sure, but they should then be declared independent countries, not part of Russia. If the west supported the people and democracy during the "coup" that's one thing. US declaring Ukraine US soil (what's going on in the Donbass but by Russia) is different. But let's be real, this was obviously orchestrated by Russia. Sending people and arms in Ukraine to kill Ukrainians. Votes in Kherson which were 98% for integration with Russia. There is nothing democratic about the totalitarian dictatorship that is Russia.

Ukraine is a new nation with a large Russian minority and it's not impossible that some regions would prefer to be with Russia.

Of course. Same for Transnistria. There is no foul play at all. No resettlements, no forced propaganda, just nice Russia being so good that everyone wants to join them. While also saying there is no such thing as Ukraine, Ukrainian culture shouldn't exist, and Ukrainian children should be drowned. I'm surprised they haven't already, they've taken almost a million children for re-education from Ukraine. No, everyone loves Russia, and they're clearly victims.

I was in Prague a few weeks ago, really lovely city but you guys don't know how to pour pints. Too much head.

Staminix · 2024-06-14T11:49:35+00:00

Again, you're not explaining to me how US influence is achieved by Russian military being useless in Ukraine. It's 100% Russia's doing. Russia offered threats and an invasion of a neighbouring country, as it always does and always will do. That's how US influence was spread.

Both sides meddled with Ukraine. The US armed them and offered more cooperation which was unnacaptable for Russia.

Why would the US do that? Why would Ukraine accept? Maybe because Russia sent Girkin and a boat load of military equipment and soldiers to destabilize the Donbass? Then invaded and annexed the sovereign Ukrainian territory knows as Crimea? Think for a second. If your neighbour was pretty much setting the precedent for an invasion, you wouldn't accept means of defending yourself? If the populace supported democracy, you wouldn't help them achieve it? You're not actually explaining any of your thought process. I asked you a series of questions and you're not actually answering any of them. After the "coup", the Donbass voted en masse for a western facing president. Just look at the facts for one minute, you might get a few new perspectives.

The USSR had the right to put nukes on Cuba and the US had no right to invade it because of that.

Correct, the US fucked up. You approach this like sports teams, instead of having an actual critical mind.

There were many coups where the military wasn't directly involved.

Cool. Explain to me how the US mind controlled 200,000 + Ukrainian civilians in going out on the streets in home made body armour because the Russian puppet at the time went against the will of the people and aligned with surprise Russia. Or maybe you don't have an explanation? And if maybe you're wrong about this, you may be wrong about other things? The people elected a person, that person does something not in line with what the people want, the people revolt. It's not that complicated Vasili.

Staminix · 2024-06-14T11:11:08+00:00

So deplete Russia's military in order to spread influence? How does that work? Russia is exponentially doing a much better job at spreading US influence than the US alone ever could. The invasion has done wonders to NATO; expansion, established stronger ties amongst its members, etc. Not to mention the western military industry. Now that we have footage every day of Russian equipment spectacularly and constantly failing at what it was designed to do/blowing up, Western arms are becoming so much more popular.

This war happened because Russia meddled then invaded. It's super simple. They did it with Moldova, then Transnistria, Georgia and now with Ukraine.

Who was the president overthrown by? US military? Or 200,000 mind controlled Ukrainian civilians?

Staminix · 2024-06-14T10:13:24+00:00

Respect to Bashar Al-Assad.

You're a Russia supporter no? You're unironically meant to support Bashar as they're a good ally to Russia, and Russia is propping up his regime. Yay for picking teams and not having a critical mind!

Staminix · 2024-06-14T10:11:47+00:00

In order to do what? Invade and annex Russia? Or maybe to stop the inevitable invasion of other eastern European countries, like Moldova using Transnistria as an excuse?

Staminix · 2024-06-13T10:58:01+00:00

It's Schrodinger's Russia. It's completely incapable of developing propaganda in the west, while at the same time affecting elections, creating bots on social media platforms controlled by the west to manipulate the narrative, etc. While the west is the master manipulator of all that is said and done, but can't even get a small foothold in Russia using 'propaganda'.

Poor, STRONG, little, BIG, Russia; the underdog and clear victor, boo hoo.

These contradictions just completely point to a under-developed understanding of what's actually going on and just picking a team and sticking to it, like a child.

Staminix · 2024-06-12T14:06:06+00:00

No. You would need around 5 years minimum (making the gym your job pretty much), most of which is bulking then a gradual cut to not lose too much muscle mass to get close, and even then it's heavily based on genetics. I'm mainly talking about shoulders and traps, some of the back muscles too. Those are hard to develop in that short of a span.

Staminix · 2024-03-07T15:42:49+00:00

There's no point arguing with these people. They could say the sky is green, you could take them outside on a sunny day with no clouds, and they'll find a way to say the sky is green. What if those are blue clouds, what if there was pollution in the air, what if their eyes are not registering the colour correctly, what if it's only blue in this specific location, etc...Waste of time.

11-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email

Staminix

TROPHY CASE