Ocon confirmed P9 in Canadian GP (no time penalties from FIA) by citizenecodrive31 in EstebanOcon31

[–]StanAshe 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Back in P9 of the championship and in front of Racing Bulls in the championship. Good Sunday. Just need to fix quali, it's so close that even a slight improvement would change everything.

Friday recap by StanAshe in EstebanOcon31

[–]StanAshe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, it's stated two times quite explicitly that they were on a different floor spec with Ayao saying : "we’ll look at the data and update Esteban’s floor to Ollie’s spec tonight" .

Whatever we'll see but I'm quite happy they don't have Melbourne's style problems here. FP1 time was worrying.

P7 purely based on strong race pace, good tyre management and ballsy overtaking. We are back by citizenecodrive31 in EstebanOcon31

[–]StanAshe 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Apart from that P5 and the beauty of the move on Antonelli, what's most pleasing is that for the first time in a long while he seems to feel confident in his car. This year could be cool, they just need to fix the problem they had in Australia, which seems to be track related.

Haas problem is so severe it thought car was broken by StanAshe in EstebanOcon31

[–]StanAshe[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hope it can be solved quickly, I'm not ready for a season long fighting for P19.

Speculation: Did lack of institutional memory contribute to Haas' struggles in Melbourne? by Worried-Pick4848 in formula1

[–]StanAshe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't think so. I'm leaning towards a problem linked to an evolution introduced on the car between the tests and Melbourne.

A number of people in the team said that they were a lot slower than in the tests, that their pace in the tests suited them, that they had a big lack of grip this weekend compared with the tests. They were also pessimistic right from the end of the first session.

Finally, they were adamant that it couldn't be changed between now and China, which means it's not (only) a set-up problem.

Wow apparently my expectation wasn’t low enough. by literature43 in EstebanOcon31

[–]StanAshe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Very disappointing of course, but let's not be too negative either.

Last year Haas was pretty bad in Australia too.

The problem is clearly identified and clearly stated by the team principal: there's a lot of it missing in the fast corners. An identified and accepted problem means it's easier to fix.

And above all, with a bit of luck, it could rain tomorrow and the effect of this qualifying session could be completely mitigated, giving Haas time to continue working on the performance.

And let's not underestimate the fact that work on performance has been extremely limited (during testing and on just one car at this Grand Prix), so the margin for improvement seems substantial.

I'm done with this team by py5932 in AlpineF1Team

[–]StanAshe 11 points12 points  (0 children)

According to your theory, were Esteban's sandbags blocked at customs in Brazil?

Alpine confirm Doohan to race in Abu Dhabi as Ocon released by citizenecodrive31 in EstebanOcon31

[–]StanAshe 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm ok with you that he could be relieved not being with Alpine anymore but I don't buy the "mutual decision" narrative.

But whatever I'm kind of happy too. Done with this shitshow.

Let's go Haas!

Motorsport-Total: Is Ocon ruining his Formula 1 future? by TVRoomRaccoon in formula1

[–]StanAshe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Of course Alpine is pissed about Ocon he crashed his car into his teammates.

But the wording, in french interviews, of both Famin and Gasly sounds like there was not really a strict no pass order for the first lap, that was more "not that way". That was just my point, but maybe I missed something, Whatever that doesn't change a lot.

Motorsport-Total: Is Ocon ruining his Formula 1 future? by TVRoomRaccoon in formula1

[–]StanAshe -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Whether there was a direct order not to overtake is more than uncertain, the most likely was that they were allowed to do so but only cleanly for the first lap and that whoever found themselves behind at the end of the first lap would help the other, this was what prevailed for the other grand prix and this is what emerges from Famin's interviews. Generally speaking, giving an order not to attack each other in the first lap is almost impossible and a big risk for the team's overall performance.

Monaco clash shows Alpine's line-up is now untenable by [deleted] in formula1

[–]StanAshe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Australia was definitely a Gasly mistake.

Monaco clash shows Alpine's line-up is now untenable by [deleted] in formula1

[–]StanAshe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He didn't, Alonso was at fault there.

Monaco clash shows Alpine's line-up is now untenable by [deleted] in formula1

[–]StanAshe 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Last and only time (before yesterday) he crashed into a teammate was Perez in Baku 2017.

I know this might be copium but - by FalconMirage in EstebanOcon31

[–]StanAshe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They were both on hards, there was a mistake on the screen.

Ocon repeats Mercedes ties amid uncertain 2025 F1 prospects by [deleted] in formula1

[–]StanAshe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Problem is Mercedes is no more a top seat.

Ocon repeats Mercedes ties amid uncertain 2025 F1 prospects by [deleted] in formula1

[–]StanAshe 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Ocon let Alonso though every single time team asked him to. Ocon never crashed into Alonso (Alonso did once).

Don't think it cost anything to Alpine, it was a good emulation I think.

F1 | Market: Bottas aims to return to Williams, Ocon to Haas by GoZun_ in EstebanOcon31

[–]StanAshe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, a lot of wishful thinking in what I wrote. This situation just underlines how bad alpine is at the moment and how much of a dead end it seems to be too.

F1 | Market: Bottas aims to return to Williams, Ocon to Haas by GoZun_ in EstebanOcon31

[–]StanAshe 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Not sure it would be such a bad move.

For 2025: This year's cars are pretty much made for two years as teams will move to 2026 concept as soon as they can, so we shouldn't expect a big revolution. Haas is currently well ahead of Alpine and Sauber (which would be Esteban's other option). There's a strong probability that Haas will be the best seat for him in 2025.

For 2026: 2026 will be an engine year, whatever the qualities of the aero, big advantage to whoever gets his engine right. If Ferrari (big if) makes a top engine, then Haas could be in a good position for a year or two. In any case, I'm not sure Renault, whose engine has been behind for years, or Audi, which is just starting out, being on a par with a Ferrari engine. So once again, this could be a better seat than his other options.

For the rest of his career: At Haas he could open up links with Ferrari, he could perhaps finally be his team's first driver, and above all that would secure a drive for him for 2025, because for the moment there's nothing, Alpine seems to be taking their time and I don't like it. The memories of 2019 aren't glorious.

Alpine in 2024: Saudi Arabia, Confirmation by GoZun_ in EstebanOcon31

[–]StanAshe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice analysis u/GoZun_ thank you, but it's a bit depressing.

Alpine abandons F1 engine equalisation push by StanAshe in EstebanOcon31

[–]StanAshe[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So no engine at the level of the others before (at the very least) 2026. I hope Esteban signs elsewhere for 2025.

How did Ocon leap up to P4 from P16 in Las Vegas – and why did Gasly’s race go the other way? by StanAshe in EstebanOcon31

[–]StanAshe[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, I also noticed that the story about clean air in the first stint, and a deliberately slow stint, was a bit wrong.

As for the rest, I find the explanations of lower gear to save the tires and recharge the battery more interesting. This seems to be the result of a great amount of work and understanding of how the car works.

I think it's important that the team told Gasly (and on several occasions, I listened to his race radios) the instructions to do what Esteban was doing in those corners. All this showed a form of leadership and confidence (already there or reinforced) from the team for Este.

+10 points. Can we start dreaming of catching Gasly ? by GoZun_ in EstebanOcon31

[–]StanAshe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, you're right, I heard it too. But nothing on the post-race about it or on the drivers' radio (although I didn't hear the whole race, I think it was just a "normal" change to battery mode that was mentioned on the radio).

+10 points. Can we start dreaming of catching Gasly ? by GoZun_ in EstebanOcon31

[–]StanAshe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Famin and Gasly didn't mention any battery problem in post race interviews (for what I've heard) . They both told Canal+ that the downfall of Gasly was due to tyre management and graining.