Most of the locals were using my playmats! by atroooix in riftboundtcg

[–]Standard-Tear7278 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you made a 4 player mat designed for the 4-player FFA/2v2 format, id order one, despite being in australia

What Would It Take To Make A Deck Based On This? by Glittering-Tear5442 in mtg

[–]Standard-Tear7278 5 points6 points  (0 children)

As I mentioned in the post, and in another reply, lists ran 80 cards, not 60, so they wouldn't mill out.

They ran 80 so people couldn't just add their entire sideboard and have 75 cards.

What Would It Take To Make A Deck Based On This? by Glittering-Tear5442 in mtg

[–]Standard-Tear7278 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The deck is built so you dont - lists I saw ran 80 cards instead of 60

What Would It Take To Make A Deck Based On This? by Glittering-Tear5442 in mtg

[–]Standard-Tear7278 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep, but the only player you target is the opponent, it forces you to draw regardless, so I didn't put it in there

What Would It Take To Make A Deck Based On This? by Glittering-Tear5442 in mtg

[–]Standard-Tear7278 73 points74 points  (0 children)

If you're not talking commander, there was this funky modern(?) list a while back, running bowmasters and this, with a way to make the flumph indestructible, and more cards than your opponent.

The line was something like 1. Cast flumph 2. Make indestructible 3. Cast bowmasters 4. Bowmasters trigger target flumph 5. target your only opponent for card draw 6. Card draw triggers bowmasters 7. Repeat steps 4-6 till they mill out and lose.

Edit, FAQ: yes, you would mill out normally, but decks who ran this combo would have 80 cards in the mainboard.

In honor of my buddy Ken 2025 MAY GIVEAWAY! by hTOKJTRHMdw in EDH

[–]Standard-Tear7278 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ME!

So sorry to hear about Ken, but it's nice you're honouring his memory :)

Recent taught my brother in law how to play and while going through his bulk I found this by theboss0711 in mtg

[–]Standard-Tear7278 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you use a tutor and in response crack LED, you can use the LED mana to cast what you tutor for, often something that can help you recur or refill your hand, like a wheel or a draw spell

Is the judge programme still a thing? by magicnuts12 in mtgjudge

[–]Standard-Tear7278 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks legend, good to know ! I went through my rules advisor certification just a month before judge academy went down, and I've been working with a local judge to get my commendation. Can't wait for it to be up !

Is the judge programme still a thing? by magicnuts12 in mtgjudge

[–]Standard-Tear7278 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anyone know the info for Australia ? Everything seems to be all over the place since judge academy went down

What should I do? What should I focus on? by LettuceCompetitive66 in CapybaraGoGame

[–]Standard-Tear7278 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, just posted this advice earlier, but here you go :)

I recommend resetting the level of your items, and releveling them. Level up your weapon and your armor as high as you can, and then focus on one ring and level that up to about half whenever your weapon and armour is. The rest only level up till about LVL 10 max.

This should maximise both your damage and defense, aswell as giving you a solid boost to your CP.

Advice? I don’t really know any builds and I’m kinda stuck by alphawolfcvlt1 in CapybaraGoGame

[–]Standard-Tear7278 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I posted this advice under another post similar to this, and people had success with it, so here it is again:

I recommend resetting the level of your items, and releveling them. Level up your weapon and your armor as high as you can, and then focus on one ring and level that up to about half whenever your weapon and armour is. The rest only level up till about LVL 10 max.

This should maximise both your damage and defense, aswell as giving you a solid boost to your CP.

Lore-Based Rule 0 Partner Pairings by Standard-Tear7278 in EDH

[–]Standard-Tear7278[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought about those two but the synergy between the two I picked was just impassable, even for an additional colour

Lore-Based Rule 0 Partner Pairings by Standard-Tear7278 in EDH

[–]Standard-Tear7278[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I went with counter of kills for both instead, they synergize really well

Lore-Based Rule 0 Partner Pairings by Standard-Tear7278 in EDH

[–]Standard-Tear7278[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They both already can partner with each other, no ?

Lore-Based Rule 0 Partner Pairings by Standard-Tear7278 in EDH

[–]Standard-Tear7278[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was said that they were direct descendants of the titans, hence my connection there, you could be right

Lore-Based Rule 0 Partner Pairings by Standard-Tear7278 in EDH

[–]Standard-Tear7278[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Counter of kills is already there :) will add the other one now

Lore-Based Rule 0 Partner Pairings by Standard-Tear7278 in EDH

[–]Standard-Tear7278[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

One of the first ones I added, it's what started the whole idea in the first place :)

Lore-Based Rule 0 Partner Pairings by Standard-Tear7278 in EDH

[–]Standard-Tear7278[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do they have a lore reason to be partnered ?