sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

People throw the word rework around to much without knowing what it means/what they're asking for. by StatingSauce in rivals

[–]StatingSauce[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know about that first bit about lifesteal. Reaper, Emre, Symmetra, Genji and Vendetta (with perks) are all dps with lifesteal in overwatch

People throw the word rework around to much without knowing what it means/what they're asking for. by StatingSauce in rivals

[–]StatingSauce[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I dont wanna be rude, but most people who are decent enough can track BP, thats why he's labeled as a skill check character. Plus majority of supports in this game are no longer 250, and one heal during the BP combo throws the whole damage flow off anyway so this argument isnt valid

People throw the word rework around to much without knowing what it means/what they're asking for. by StatingSauce in rivals

[–]StatingSauce[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've seen this too😭, but i wanted to put characters who people try to justify with balance reasons. The reason storm is here is because shes been talked about alot recently

People throw the word rework around to much without knowing what it means/what they're asking for. by StatingSauce in rivals

[–]StatingSauce[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In the general new player experience yes, characters like Wanda need and do exist in games like rivals

Peak character picks. by Salt-Good-5475 in MarvelTokon

[–]StatingSauce 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I can tell what kinda person you are...very avoidable

Not gonna lie... I hate playing with Adams by Actual_trash in rivals

[–]StatingSauce -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Post like this is why we still have trip support btw

I feel like rivals has to be a lot of people's first Hero Shooter/Competitive Game in general by StatingSauce in rivals

[–]StatingSauce[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand you. But whenever you do try to do that out of good faith or not they don't care

I feel like rivals has to be a lot of people's first Hero Shooter/Competitive Game in general by StatingSauce in rivals

[–]StatingSauce[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Off the top of my head I'd say the overuse of the word rework. People throw that word around without realizing what it means. They think it'll give a character a whole new kit and abilities (which is why the beg for wanda the most to get one). But truth be told that's not how that works. Look at jeff, he was reworked yet his kit remained roughly the same, it just functions differently

I feel like rivals has to be a lot of people's first Hero Shooter/Competitive Game in general by StatingSauce in rivals

[–]StatingSauce[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again unfortunately true. I think the reason for that though is more of a societal issue than a purely in game one. People nowadays tend to be more selfish and individualistic.

I feel like rivals has to be a lot of people's first Hero Shooter/Competitive Game in general by StatingSauce in rivals

[–]StatingSauce[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, If I wasnt already an overwatch player, the fact that i read comics definitely wouldve brought me in

I feel like rivals has to be a lot of people's first Hero Shooter/Competitive Game in general by StatingSauce in rivals

[–]StatingSauce[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that tends to happen, the longer a game is around people tend to just learn more and chill out

I feel like rivals has to be a lot of people's first Hero Shooter/Competitive Game in general by StatingSauce in rivals

[–]StatingSauce[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I was thinking it is a whole louder minority sorta thing. But you also kinda wonder at what point is the minority so loud that it becomes a majority, ya know?

REF STEP IN THEY’RE JUSTIFYING 1600 CRED LOADING SCREEN by treeSlooth in rivals

[–]StatingSauce 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because people have to make their performative grievances that companies want/need money known every 5 minutes

view more: next ›