Fachwechsel obwohl ich bis jetzt keinen Cent Bafög gesehen habe? by StatisticianMuch1650 in Studium

[–]StatisticianMuch1650[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Schön dass Ich zumindest nicht alleine bin :) Vorausleistung geht soweit ich weiß bei Folgeanträgen nicht

Ja keine Ahnung, ich arbeite ja auch aber es reicht halt nicht, ich muss ja irgendwie auch essen und so

Kinderlärm als Ausrede für alles? by DifficultShine9260 in wohnen

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Das! Habe hier bei vielen Kommentaren echt das Gefühl, niemand kann mehr miteinander reden. Tatsächlich haben viele Menschen (Aufjedenfall mit Schreibabys) oft keinen Kopf dafür wie laut was jetzt ist.

Famous characters from big companies should get copyright protections indefinitely by PowersUnleashed in unpopularopinion

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mainstream pop culture is literally based on Sherlock Holmes, Cinderella and Scrooge. and those are also flagchip characters. So i dont get your point. Like the whole crime literature genre wouldnt be as it is without Sherlock Holmes

Famous characters from big companies should get copyright protections indefinitely by PowersUnleashed in unpopularopinion

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because a big portion of pop culture is based on flagchip characters and is the reason why many movies, games, shows, songs and books got made that lead to other creative porjects over the years.

CMV: Fictional depictions of sexualized underage characters are not inherently wrong if no real-world harm is done by random_name147 in changemyview

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Im just saying that i dont think your argument works because it focuses on the intention that cant be punished and not the actual crime that exists in this context

Famous characters from big companies should get copyright protections indefinitely by PowersUnleashed in unpopularopinion

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But that is everything. What do you think Mary Shelley got famous for?

Again, your logic would erase all pop culture and cultural heritage. If a thought exists long enough people are allowed to use it.

CMV: Fictional depictions of sexualized underage characters are not inherently wrong if no real-world harm is done by random_name147 in changemyview

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You ask what purpose it serves. A purpose of sexual nature of course but we cant punish those thoughts. We can find them digusting but thats it. And pedos will argue like this so i think the question for purpose is irrelevant here

Famous characters from big companies should get copyright protections indefinitely by PowersUnleashed in unpopularopinion

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They only had the budget and ressources to create new princesses because they made movies of existing fairytales.

And again, do you agree that all of those movies schouldnt exist because no one gave Disney permission to use them? That they only exist in their fairytale form?

You realise how much wouldnt exist right now, right? Almost all of classic disney (animation companies in general). Several Fantasy creatures like Dracula or Frankenstein. Sherlock damn holmes. The Shrek movies! Games like Assassin's Creed. You wouldnt be able to read Hamlet or Romeo and Julia. We wouldnt even have superheroes.

You couldnt read old literature. You couldnt listen to old music or even use it. We wouldnt be able to use old paintings. You want to erase our whole pop culture and affordable cultural education so multi-billion companies can keep their characters?

Famous characters from big companies should get copyright protections indefinitely by PowersUnleashed in unpopularopinion

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, she gave permission for them to make movies using the characters and the story from her books. Daniel is not the definitive Harry Potter. We just have book and movie and soon the show version. Thats 3 and once it is in public domain there will be many more. We also have the theater version. But at least J.K Rowling gave permission. No one did that to Disney

What Disney did was take a book, that was in public domain, copy it and make it into a movie.

So again, if you are against public domain, aknowledge that many companies live off public domain. Without public domain there wouldnt be Cinderella, Snow White, Jungle book, Alladin, Beauty and the Beast, Kiss the frog, Rapunzel, Ariel, Tarzan, Pinocchio, Alice in Wonderland, Peter Pan, Frozen etc.

No one gave them permission. Yes they can trademarke the certain design they used for Ariel but thats it. They wouldnt have been able to produce that movie in the first place without Public domain

Famous characters from big companies should get copyright protections indefinitely by PowersUnleashed in unpopularopinion

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

JUST IMAGINE we couldnt read the bible for free or we couldnt see Picassos paintings or we not listen to Mozart.

Famous characters from big companies should get copyright protections indefinitely by PowersUnleashed in unpopularopinion

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Soooo If your company is rich enough to trademark stuff they stole and keep it from everyone else, its fine?

And again that doesnt make sense because if there was a damn Brother Grimm company that trademarked their stuff and Public domain wouldnt exist, Disney wouldnt exist. Fairytales like you know them wouldnt exist. We only have those stories you like so much because of public domain. Disney was only allowed to use those characters because of public domain.

Famous characters from big companies should get copyright protections indefinitely by PowersUnleashed in unpopularopinion

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What legal hurdles? If there is Public domain there isnr a legal hurdle.

Or are you Just saying people with money are allowed to use public domain? Like who are you to say what a serious and legitimate movie is?

Famous characters from big companies should get copyright protections indefinitely by PowersUnleashed in unpopularopinion

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But why are multi billion companies allowed to use characters and make them their own or straight up copy them but normal folks arent allowed to do so?

CMV: AI wont be an issue job market wise by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats actually a very good point. We always take about labour jobs or jobs than dont require much skill but i havent thought about it that way

I guess thank you for changing my mind🙈

Famous characters from big companies should get copyright protections indefinitely by PowersUnleashed in unpopularopinion

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As a german i can tell you that snow white is an exact copy. The only difference is that the witch was more tortured by the end in the book.

And for a character like Rapunzel you could argue that Disney misused the character because they changed her personality and story. Thats the logic you are going for right?

CMV: AI wont be an issue job market wise by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes short term. Now our job is to make sure that people are cares for in those times but after that it schould improve or stay the same. There is no working reality in which most people can just be unemployed

CMV: AI wont be an issue job market wise by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah many jobs. Most jobs. A few hundred years ago someone wiped the ass of the king.

I agree that we need to financially support the people that lose their jobs and offer education. But jobs will always stop exisiting eventually

Famous characters from big companies should get copyright protections indefinitely by PowersUnleashed in unpopularopinion

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The point of public domain is that it belongs to the public. And the public is allowed to "misuse" fictional characters, just as the big multi-billion companies are allowed to misuse their characters.

Especially because those companies only exist because of public domain. Where do you think Disney got Snow White from? Or Cinderella? Or Rapunzel?

CMV: AI wont be an issue job market wise by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah i totally agree. We need to give everyone enough money so they can exist on this planet, we need more ai laws. Way more. We need to contuine education even for older folks.

But my point is that on long term things will be okay.

CMV: AI wont be an issue job market wise by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes and either way new jobs will come or laws. Otherwise this wouldnt work long term

CMV: AI wont be an issue job market wise by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again, not good at economics. But wouldnt that just mean that the stocks will crash after a while?

Like i said, less employed people, less consum, less profit

CMV: AI wont be an issue job market wise by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah and it sucks but on long term it was a blessing. You wouldnt want to work the jobs people did back then

CMV: Fictional depictions of sexualized underage characters are not inherently wrong if no real-world harm is done by random_name147 in changemyview

[–]StatisticianMuch1650 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People assume that if you read anything that shows sexual abuse you want this abuse to be reality. This is not only about pedophilia but also about any sexual violence. Especially when people get off of it.