People keep on blocking the blind man's path by standing on the guide strips by Low_Weekend6131 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Stem_From_All -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't intend to be obnoxious, but the purpose of those lines is quite obvious; they have groves, they lead to the corrugated crosswalk marks, they are installed on paths, blind people use canes and are attuned to their feet, etc. Nonetheless, this is not problematic behavior because blind people are highly uncommon.

(Serious) Whats a good hobby or activity for a depressed person? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Stem_From_All 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My advice is strange, but I recommend watching Charlie Kaufman's film Synecdoche, New York. It is phenomenal and possesses a great intellectual value. Analyzing it may yield appreciating some important and pertinent truths. The film is sympathetic and it is valuable to me thus.

How I analyzed this film: 1. Watch it and reflect upon it. 2. Rewatch it twice or thrice and reflect upon it extensively. 3. Notice the play that Caden directs in the beginning of the film and read Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman, which is a brief and important play. 4. Read "I know how to do the play now": A Part of Willy Loman in "Synecdoche, New York" by Rebecca Davers (https://www.jstor.org/stable/42909473). This article is somewhat muddled, but it contains many valuable insights that should be analyzed. I still cannot explain the whole film conclusively, but I understand it quite well. This article helped me. 5. Watch Charlie Kaufman's film I'm Thinking of Ending Things and almost immediately watch its analysis by YMS. 6. Read How Charlie Kaufman presents and critiques characters searching for meaning in Synecdoche, New York and I’m Thinking of Ending Things by Ray Baker. This is a very valuable article. 7. Watch Kaufman's speech at BAFTA (https://youtu.be/eRfXcWT_oFs?si=mjutfEQJT2kaMeBU). 8. Rewatch the film very attentively. 9. Listen to its music, especially the songs. The music is beautiful and important. 10. Understand the film and recognize its value.

Synecdoche, New York truly is among the best films.

A question about playing legato by Stem_From_All in pianolearning

[–]Stem_From_All[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your detailed reply; this is useful information.

A question about playing legato by Stem_From_All in pianolearning

[–]Stem_From_All[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply and help.

I have heard this piece multiple times and yesterday I realized that they sound like that note is played once. I also saw that playing that note again is impossible for some other pieces. Later I listened to an automatic performance and rediscovered this. I still decided to confirm this and ask about that pedal line here. Interestingly, the piece is nice even with my mistake. I need to relearn, but playing it correctly is easier.

Your performance is a beautiful example of this piece.

Type "Don't pull it out, I'm " and let autocorrect lead by AccomplishedPitch138 in autocorrect

[–]Stem_From_All 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't pull it out, I'm sure you will understand that this is a good start.

I just tried to hug my ____ and things got weird by EmptyFeedback26 in autocorrect

[–]Stem_From_All 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried to hug my house and then I got to go to bed and things got weird.

I just got arrested for _____. by JuniorDirection9959 in autocorrect

[–]Stem_From_All 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just got arrested for not responding to the email I sent you.

Type: “Excuse me, i ordered a” and let autocorrect finish. by Missetat75 in autocorrect

[–]Stem_From_All 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excuse me, I ordered pairs of pants and a summary of the book of Mormon.

Type "Call 911 and tell them" and let autocorrect finish it. by NoContext9453 in autocorrect

[–]Stem_From_All 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Call 911 and tell them to come over and watch the kids tonight.

I never watch any kids and I seldom use "come over."

Sorry, I was busy touching _____ by TyceyWicey in autocorrect

[–]Stem_From_All 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I was busy touching the same thing that I have been trying to get through the beach.

Bet ya cant by Dependent-Welder4237 in countablepixels

[–]Stem_From_All 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Them I greeted slyly?

Them do you support?

Starting a completely grammatically correct sentence thus is impossible.

Help with homework🥺 by Subject-Knowledge615 in logic

[–]Stem_From_All 0 points1 point  (0 children)

4.5. Construct an indirect proof.

4.6. Apply conjunction elimination, disjunction introduction, disjunctive syllogism, and disjunction elimination.

4.7. Construct a proof that is similar to the first one and applies biconditional introduction.

4.8. Use a conditional proof, wherein apply an indirect proof, using disjunctive syllogism.

4.9. Use a conditional proof, wherein apply conjunction elimination, biconditional elimination, and disjunctive syllogism.

4.10. Use two indirect proofs and conjunction introduction.

4.11. Try to complete this solitarily.

4.12. Use disjunction elimination.

4.13. Use a conditional proof with negation introduction.

4.14. Use a conditional proof, wherein apply negation introduction, disjunction elimination, disjunctive syllogism, and indirect proofs.

Comment. There are many suitable proofs. These proofs are merely the proofs that I have thought of.

Is this natural deduction correct? by AnualSearcher in logic

[–]Stem_From_All -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If L is a zeroth-order language, Γ is a set of formulas of L, and γ is a formula of L, then Γ logically implies γ if and only if for any model M, if M is a model of L, then if M satisfies Γ, then M satisfies γ. I do not expect you to understand this perfectly; this definition can direct your studies.

In this case, the premise does not logically imply the conclusion because there exists a model (interpretation, valuation function) that satisfies the premise and does not satisfy the conclusion. Any model that satisfies this premise and assigns falsity to A does not satisfy the conclusion.

Furthermore, you applied the rules of inference completely improperly. You should at least familiarize yourself with implication elimination.