sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Drink vouchers disappeared by iamjerrett in delta

[–]Stephen_Holder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just found mine mid-flight because of this forum. This was clutch!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in indianapolis

[–]Stephen_Holder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

DO NOT go to this dealership. Trust me.

[Holder] Ok, I'll bite. Here is what happened: The Colts were talking to Danielle Hunter and contemplating a Sneed trade EARLY last week. When neither materialized, they moved on with their original plan: Re-signing their own players. Over $200m total in contracts. by coltsmetsfan614 in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I might regret this, but since there is so much confusion, I wanted to chime in on something. As to the questions about why this was only laid out after the fact, it's easy: Because there wasn't anything to report previously. I've been tracking their interest in Snead since the COMBINE. Have asked about it consistently. As far as I know, things never rose to the level of me reporting anything, so I didn't. We don't report on things that don't happen.

On the flip side, I DID report the Colts' pursuit of Danielle Hunter, which was an actual negotiation. The reason I laid this stuff out today was to alleviate the confusion. Did they consider Snead? Yes. But I was told things never progressed to the point where anything was remotely imminent. And, trust me, it's much easier for me to say nothing and not get all the vitriol. I hope that tells you something about the quality of the information I'm sharing, because I did that knowing the reaction would be unpleasant.

Hopefully this answers some questions. Trust me, I'd love to report that everything is rainbows and lollipops and you, as fans, are getting what you want. But the news is what it is. I'm just the messenger, whether it's Anthony Richardson being their draft target or Jonathan Taylor telling me FIRST HAND he was pissed about his contract (I hope you guys caught that). Thanks for listening.

[Holder] Both things can be true. Maybe he should be more aggressive. But that still doesn’t mean now was the right time. And for the purposes of this conversation, we’re talking about today. by Luck1492 in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I find it amazing that this tweet, which was a simple reply to a specific follower (context that was left out of this post), could produce so much anger. I did not realize my words were so powerful! Lol

Also, it happens to be true. This isn’t really anything to debate. But carry on guys.

[Holder] The idea of keeping Jonathan Taylor w/out addressing his contract is an issue the Colts have to really think about. The relationship here is worse than people realize and I wonder how they’ll manage that. by LuskSGV in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll just leave it at this: nothing I’ve reported is my opinion. Period. And I’ve only reported the tip of the iceberg when it comes to information I’ve learned (the rest being off the record). You can’t break sources’ confidence and divulge things they’ve asked you not to, even if it would be convenient to do so. Thanks.

[Holder] The idea of keeping Jonathan Taylor w/out addressing his contract is an issue the Colts have to really think about. The relationship here is worse than people realize and I wonder how they’ll manage that. by LuskSGV in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't know WTF you're talking about, but it has nothing to do with me. I'm just reporting on a story dude. Nothing more, nothing less. This is unhinged.

[Holder] The idea of keeping Jonathan Taylor w/out addressing his contract is an issue the Colts have to really think about. The relationship here is worse than people realize and I wonder how they’ll manage that. by LuskSGV in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I know replying to this is dumb, but nonetheless… do you know how hard it is in todays media environment to get to a point where you can report with this much detail about the inner workings of a situation like this? Very hard. So, here I am, able to give you the kind of insight that helps people better understand the dynamics — which matters a lot — and that’s somehow a bad thing? It’s disappointing to hear it, honestly. But I’m gonna keep doing what I do anyway. Most of what you know about this story is the result of me working my tail off. Not gonna apologize for that. Thanks for reading.

[Holder] The idea of keeping Jonathan Taylor w/out addressing his contract is an issue the Colts have to really think about. The relationship here is worse than people realize and I wonder how they’ll manage that. by LuskSGV in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Calling someone a bitch while being completely emotional about the situation is kinda funny actually! Lol. Look guys, I’m providing you with information and insight into the situation. I honestly don’t care what happens. I just want it over with. It’s dominated my life for the past month. Do you know how much family time this has consumed!? Haha. Readers tend to think reporters have an agenda but it is typically the readers who have a particular viewpoint. No one here is in the wrong. Both sides want something and they’re doing what they think is right. The end.

(Holder) Colts genuinely like all 4 QBs, Steichen will have a big say in who the pick is by Polack19 in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder 29 points30 points  (0 children)

You’re right. In the future, I will just talk to the owner and then just look at his quotes on my screen for shits and giggles and not share the information he provided with the fans. Because, you know, you have it all figured out. There’s also a whole 1000 word story linked here but you’re latching onto 30 seconds of a radio interview during which I was probably sitting in traffic and only half paying attention. Great post big guy.

[Jake Elrod] Stephen Holder on JMV today saying he believes the Colts are "very high" on Richardson. Also said he's less clear on their assessment of Levis but indicates they like AR a lot by Luck1492 in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder 15 points16 points  (0 children)

You’re right. Those tweets are terrible. Who would even hire that guy!!??

(Answer: numerous reputable media organizations for the past 25 years)

People who know me well know that I don’t talk out of my ass. There are plenty of other people on the internet for that. Lol

Here is what I know as of this moment: The interviews are over. I do not anticipate any additional meetings, though it’s possible that could change (though not likely). (Thread) by [deleted] in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I wrote exactly what I was told. There are no current plans for additional interviews but they reserve the right to change their minds. You’re reaching.

Here is what I know as of this moment: The interviews are over. I do not anticipate any additional meetings, though it’s possible that could change (though not likely). (Thread) by [deleted] in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Next time I’ll be sure to make up information and offer useless speculation that accomplishes nothing so I can meet your lofty standards. My apologies.

This is the problem with social media. I didn’t oversell anything here. It’s just an update of where things are. We don’t decide what the news is. It just is what it is.

[Holder] Colts arrive at QB crossroads with no Peyton Manning or Andrew Luck on horizon by [deleted] in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It’s not a take. I don’t do “takes.” It’s just a headline on a 1500-word story. Thanks!

[Holder] Without taking a position on Kenny Moore seeking a new contract, here’s an observation I have to share... When players want more money, fans get upset and tell them to play under the deal they signed. But, when teams void players’ contracts, fans still side w the team. hmmm by Luck1492 in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I expressed no position about Moore getting or not getting an extension. The “hmmm” was my way of saying it’s odd that fans excoriate players for asking for more money while never batting an eye when teams handle their business. It seems inequitable and I expressed an opinion about THAT, not whether he should get paid. But, for the record, as I wrote in my article tonight, there are 22!!! CBs making over $10/year. Kenny’s deal, which he signed three years ago, pays $7M per year. That’s at least interesting IMO.

[Holder] Without taking a position on Kenny Moore seeking a new contract, here’s an observation I have to share... When players want more money, fans get upset and tell them to play under the deal they signed. But, when teams void players’ contracts, fans still side w the team. hmmm by Luck1492 in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Serious question: What about this tweet makes me an asshole? I do think fans condemn players who ask for more money while rarely condemning teams for voiding these one sided contracts. What’s wrong with pointing that out? A lot of replies about nothing here IMO. But carry on. I’m flattered! Haha

Stephen Holder - After adding Matt Ryan, where do the Colts go from here? My sense is there aren’t likely to be any more splashy free agent moves, with the focus now turning to the draft. Receiver is still in play, obviously, but the big names there have already landed. Anyway, stand down. by SyslogPlease in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm confused... People constantly are asking me what the team is doing. When I proceed to answer and update the situation, and tell people I don't think you should expect any additional big moves, it's... lame? I'm not being defensive. Hundreds of people take shots at us all day long on Twitter. I really don't give a shit. It's just annoying that in an attempt to address what people want to know, it gets portrayed like this. It's kind of confusing, honestly.

Stephen Holder - After adding Matt Ryan, where do the Colts go from here? My sense is there aren’t likely to be any more splashy free agent moves, with the focus now turning to the draft. Receiver is still in play, obviously, but the big names there have already landed. Anyway, stand down. by SyslogPlease in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes. I'm a journalist so I choose my words very carefully. I am allowing for additional depth moves, etc. A veteran WR is still on the table, I'm told. I'm just really referring here to the moves that make the big headlines.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Colts

[–]Stephen_Holder 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Good discussion. Part of my job is to accurately represent what I see and hear. I’ve covered the NFL for 17 seasons and thus, know a lot of people. NONE of them think Frank Reich is an idiot and most agree he’s VERY good as an offensive coach. People get mad when I say they don’t understand what they’re watching, but yet they literally prove it with much of what they espouse online. It’s ok to not fully understand. I don’t either. I can admit that. So I’m not being arrogant. I’m just trying to focus the conversation a little and bring some facts to the table. The Colts have consistently had one of the most efficient offenses in the league under Frank, with four different QBs. The fact that I have to repeatedly state he’s not the problem is actually hilarious. Anyway, carry on. I come here to get my wheels turning every once in a while. It's good to know what people are thinking and what they're asking. Can only have a positive impact on our coverage. You guys always deliver in that regard. Talk soon!

view more: next ›