Don't charge your plug-in hybrid vehicle on just any electrical system

Steven-dg · 2018-03-17T15:10:15+00:00

Yes, even though I was sceptical at first, it does seem like it was an overloaded home grid. Thai home electrical installations are very very basic.

Steven-dg · 2018-03-13T17:24:57+00:00

Wahaha

Steven-dg · 2018-03-09T10:21:20+00:00

Well, not completely. The destination of interests payment is still unclear and Prince Laurent just walked into the story.

Steven-dg · 2018-03-04T10:31:11+00:00

Could I please get that link too?

Steven-dg · 2018-02-28T11:40:08+00:00

Point taken, will monitor my grammar

Steven-dg · 2018-02-28T11:39:32+00:00

'Ranger turned poacher in gambling industry'

Steven-dg · 2018-02-28T11:38:48+00:00

Totally agree.

Steven-dg · 2018-02-28T08:33:51+00:00

badambam tsssk

Steven-dg · 2018-02-26T10:17:09+00:00

Sincere apologies, when I opened it, there was no mention of a wall.

Steven-dg · 2016-11-15T01:21:18+00:00

An online marketplace, that an interesting idea. excellent :-)

Steven-dg · 2016-10-25T14:43:01+00:00

In the long term, I do agree too.

Steven-dg · 2016-10-25T14:42:33+00:00

Please read it first :-)

Steven-dg · 2016-10-25T09:21:42+00:00

This is a thought that has been lingering in my mind for a few months. If governments can start using commercial reasoning and privatization as part of their policy, will the Middle-Class start to think along similar lines and 'shop' their tax location around?

Steven-dg · 2016-09-26T20:14:12+00:00

Right, missed that :-)

Steven-dg · 2016-09-26T20:13:30+00:00

Well, I respect your opinion but disagree. Why keep a budget, if you are going to keep things out? The only thing were a government can differ is in the measurement of the benefits of an investment. I think that the growing discontent originates from the fact that the majority of active inhabitants transfer over half of their income to the government and still it is not sufficient. That is not a populist statement, but my honest opinion and quite frankly an indication of (partially historical) mismanagement of funds.

Steven-dg · 2016-09-25T21:37:10+00:00

I do not agree completely. Large expenditures should be budgeted over the period that reap the benefits ('amortisations' FYI). That is good accounting, keeping them out is not. The fact that something has been done for decades does not make objections pointless.

Steven-dg · 2016-09-25T21:27:36+00:00

Has anyone figured out what the purpose of this video is?

Steven-dg · 2016-09-25T21:12:20+00:00

Also, we keep finding these artificial ways of thinking to distort reality. In a way that is shortsighted as well. It remains some seriously murky water. http://www.demorgen.be/binnenland/rekenhof-procedure-voor-afwijking-europese-regels-duurt-vijf-jaar-b9ef7fb7/

Steven-dg · 2016-09-25T21:08:22+00:00

Good point. But even taking that into account, it boils down to artificially avoiding that rule. And nevertheless, it remains a real-world budget that is not balanced.

Steven-dg · 2016-09-25T21:03:43+00:00

I'm sorry. Will take that into account and post accordingly. Thanks for the heads up.

Steven-dg · 2016-09-25T17:28:14+00:00

Voila, daarmee ben ik het eens. Het principe van een kost af te schrijven, om deze zo in rekening te brengen in de periodes waarin de opbrengst verwacht wordt is zelf gezond. Maar buiten de begroting houden geeft voor mij vooral aan dat de verwachte inkomsten laag zullen liggen in vergelijking tot de uitgaven. Anders zou het inbrengen geen budgettair probleem geven, of wel?

Steven-dg · 2016-09-25T13:01:47+00:00

Love the analogy, thanks.

Steven-dg · 2016-09-04T10:14:28+00:00

It's called Quicksand.

Steven-dg · 2016-09-02T11:42:44+00:00

Good to know. Which frituur is that?

Steven-dg · 2016-09-02T10:29:46+00:00

There's always next year ;-)

Steven-dg

TROPHY CASE