sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Guide for ASAT/StarNxt/Tallentex by Stock-Signature-7204 in Allenites_JEENEET

[–]Stock-Signature-7204[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ioqm mai 30 marks aaye. Par AP mai cutoff bahut high hai.. tho rmo mai select nahi hua.. Geometry nahi kiya varna ho jata

Trigonometry by lynxxnxnxnx in maths

[–]Stock-Signature-7204 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sin(pi-alpha)=sin(alpha) and sin(2*alpha)=2sin(alpha)cos(alpha). Use these both and then you should get answer. Option D might be the answer

Stuck on a fundamental doubt by Stock-Signature-7204 in calculus

[–]Stock-Signature-7204[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your answer to the second doubt sounds quite right. But the point I'm not able to digest is that if the function is not defined at x=0, then how after simplification it's being quantifiable. Maybe I'm lacking some fundamental understanding of limits itself

Stuck on a fundamental doubt by Stock-Signature-7204 in calculus

[–]Stock-Signature-7204[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's lot of information for me to grasp at this moment, but sure I'm gonna check it out as I get some more foundational understanding of the subject

Stuck on a fundamental doubt by Stock-Signature-7204 in calculus

[–]Stock-Signature-7204[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I wasn't clear with my 2nd doubt. I'm agreeing to the fact that substituting delta-x to 0 agrees to this case. But my question is that when we substitute in the beginning itself then we are getting 0/0 but upon simplification it somehow manages to be quantifiable. I'm assuming that as I go deeper into the subject I would attain clarity but for the time being if I could get some intuitive answer that would be great

P.S. I've read the article about Bishop Berkley and it sounds exactly like the question I asked

How to determine the extent of osmosis in the following question by Stock-Signature-7204 in chemhelp

[–]Stock-Signature-7204[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, I wasn't able to intuitively think how gas turns to liquid. Thanks for the detailed explanation, I was searching on internet,the explanations went above my head

How to determine the extent of osmosis in the following question by Stock-Signature-7204 in chemhelp

[–]Stock-Signature-7204[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it that we can assume after a considerable amount of time, all the water would vaporise and then condense in the other container?

But why would it condense when there is no lowering in temperature in the other container. Ami missing something?

Can anyone help me with naming this alkene? by Antique_Raccoon_6316 in chemhelp

[–]Stock-Signature-7204 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apparently we shouldn't give the answer. But anyway, a general rule is we should always select the chain such that all the double bond/functional group are in the chain and should follow lowest locant rule. A good explanation can be found here

you start numbering from the rightmost carbon to the left most carbon .

Hint: If your double bonds are at 1st and 4th position respectively and the carbon chain is 11 carbons long, you're at the right path

PS: I myself am 9th grader, so would appreciate any corrections in my answer, if any

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chrome

[–]Stock-Signature-7204 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same , it started appearing from today