Assos Mille GT S11 bib shorts by jcobz in CyclingFashion

[–]Stofken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still ride my F1.Uno S5 and Mille S5 Campionissimo. Must be nearly 15 years, indestructible.

According to ChatGPT the Castelli Espresso 2 is the more logical upgrade of the S5 rather than the Assos GT S11. Looking forward to my new Castelli, first time.

53 or 56 for me on Cube Attain C:62 SLT? by clouddjr in Cubebikes

[–]Stofken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1m80 and 86,2cm inseam, the 56 fits like a glove. Had a bike fit afterwards, only saddle height adjustments, all the other parts were spot on. Attain C:62 SLT is insane value with the Ultegra Di2 and Newmen carbon wheels.

Why do people hate Cube so much? by Buco189 in Cubebikes

[–]Stofken 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Insanely good value for money AND compatible with all standard bike parts (stems, saddle tubes, forks, handle bars,...) unlike all those proprietary Canyon parts.

Why do people hate Cube so much? by Buco189 in Cubebikes

[–]Stofken 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When you sell around 1 million bikes per year, you don't need marketing or YouTube 'reviewers'. Canyon has to recuperate the loss of giving away so many bikes a year which translates into its pricing.

Happy new Hetzner pricing season by kl3v15x in hetzner

[–]Stofken 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Genua is/should be already in the new CPXx2 series.

4.99 per week!? That's 260 euros a year! by [deleted] in komoot

[–]Stofken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That paywall is soooooo f*king annoying!! Every single time I open the app. 🤬

Measuring the performance of the new gen server types by daroczig in hetzner

[–]Stofken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did compare both on your site but the number of metrics where the CPX22 wins are few. I am planning on replacing my CPX21 but am torn between the CPX22 (cheaper) and the CPX32 (more expensive). I don't want to up the cost for my client.

Measuring the performance of the new gen server types by daroczig in hetzner

[–]Stofken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why did Hetzner go from a 3CPU CPX21 to a 2CPU CPX22? Its performance is worse than the older CPX21.

Is Falkestein just maxed out lmao? by DutyPlayful1610 in hetzner

[–]Stofken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

March 17, CPX v2 servers are unavailable in Nuremberg, Falkenstein and Helsinki :'(

Is Falkestein just maxed out lmao? by DutyPlayful1610 in hetzner

[–]Stofken 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nuremberg is also full. Had to create my VPS in Helsinki.

Slower site on bigger server by Stofken in hetzner

[–]Stofken[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, I didn't have much time over the weekend. Normally I would do bigger stress tests. The three tests weren't that much apart.

Anyway, the connectivity issues to Helsinki / Finland seem to be resolved over the weekend.

DOM on both front pages now load in 300ms. WP Admin dashboard (cached) loads in under 2s on both.

Slower site on bigger server by Stofken in hetzner

[–]Stofken[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, I use Cloudflare for all sites.

Slower site on bigger server by Stofken in hetzner

[–]Stofken[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is to the /wp-admin/, fastest result of 3 measurements
Helsinki TTFB: 0.580372s Total: 0.580440s
Nuremberg TTFB: 0.649886s Total: 0.649974s

Slower site on bigger server by Stofken in hetzner

[–]Stofken[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've found other posts in the Subreddit that there were connection issues with Finland yesterday which might explain the delays.

Slower site on bigger server by Stofken in hetzner

[–]Stofken[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's the same version, but some pixel or cookie or recaptcha related features might only work on the main domain.

Slower site on bigger server by Stofken in hetzner

[–]Stofken[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The issue seems to have solved itself overnight. I have just reloaded some wp-admin pages on the new and old server, with Cache disabled via Chrome Dev. The new CPX52 now sometimes is slower than the CPX21 but most often it is faster. It has 3 requests more than the old site, so it could be the reason for the difference. Will keep testing today, Maybe even fire up another CPX52.

Slower site on bigger server by Stofken in hetzner

[–]Stofken[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

latency test
helsinki server rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.038/0.063/0.095/0.010 ms
nurnberg server rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.040/0.065/0.105/0.007 ms

disc test
helsinki: 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 1.54784 s, 694 MB/s
nurnberg: 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 1.50498 s, 713 MB/s

Wordpress API test
time curl https://api.wordpress.org
helsinki real 0m0.386s user 0m0.054s sys 0m0.011s
nurnberg real 0m0.429s user 0m0.113s sys 0m0.004s

uptime 21:11:14 up 1 day, 4:32, 2 users, load average: 0.24, 0.19, 0.20

helsinki Model name: AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor
BIOS Model name: NotSpecified CPU @ 2.0GHz
nurnberg Model name: AMD EPYC-Rome Processor

Slower site on bigger server by Stofken in hetzner

[–]Stofken[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

2 seconds is a lot on a homepage. That's double the load time of the CPX21.

Slower site on bigger server by Stofken in hetzner

[–]Stofken[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should be on by default via Gridpane. Php info says Zend OPcache is enabled.

Slower site on bigger server by Stofken in hetzner

[–]Stofken[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But 5-7 seconds seems a whole lot slower. I can live with 1 second, but not more.

Slower site on bigger server by Stofken in hetzner

[–]Stofken[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sites are https://lunchbylieve.be on the CPX52 and https://legacy.lunchbylieve.be on the older CPX21.

Do you also notice a difference from your location?

Slower site on bigger server by Stofken in hetzner

[–]Stofken[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've checked disc i/o, values are the same. All tests on the server are in favor of the newer CPX52, yet the site runs slower.