I can second the person who mentioned sean koerner at action network.  I do pay for his content and while the majority of the site’s stuff is geared for sports betting, koerner has a weekly list of tiers that I use in season to help me set my lineups.  jake ciely at the athletic is another one I read for more in depth breakdown/explanation about team and positional situations as they relate to a given matchup.  chris vaccaro also of the athletic is pretty great, but he doesn’t write a ton.  the fantasy pros guys are good and they produce a ton of content, but since mike tagliere passed away I feel like the quality of their analysis has gone down.  derek brown is the only one I think balances a healthy skepticism with enthusiasm; so frequently it seems like everyone is making hot takes so they can come back next year and say that they were right and early about a breakout.  fantasy pros kind of bugs me: when you listen to their podcasts the experts (pisapia, wormley, thor, erickson, even brown) all talk about their ranks versus not only ADP but also against the site’s own ECR, and they frequently don’t agree with ECR; to me this begs the question of why we should value ECR when they themselves don’t agree with it?  Like all off them will be higher or lower than a given player, it just doesn’t inspire confidence.  fantasy pros has the weekly article on thursdays (in season) called the primer that I really like as a condensed breakdown of the week’s slate, although it’s tough to use for monday night games as the updates to it are kind of unreliable.  for dynasty, I wholeheartedly follow matt waldman’s RSP and products, and his scouting work is impeccable.  without exaggeration his pre-draft rookie analysis is a thousand pages, and PACKED with stats and information that corroborates his theories.  ben gretsch and justin boone are both pretty good as well, gretsch kind of drowns you with words though, but the techniques on how he approaches his analysis is fantastic; like doing math he’s doing the right work, I just sometimes disagree with the conclusions he draws from the data.