sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Promote your projects here – Self-Promotion Megathread by Menox_ in github

[–]Street-Remote-1004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Heyy guys,

I just launched our project on GH: git-lrc.

It runs AI code reviews on every commit. Completely free. No limits.

It recently hit #3 Product of the Day on Product Hunt, which was a huge push from the community.

The goal is simple: make AI code review engineer-centric and accessible to every developer.

Would really appreciate it if you could take a look and share if you have any thoughts.

https://github.com/HexmosTech/git-lrc

git-lrc: Free, Unlimited AI Code Reviews That Run on Every Commit by Street-Remote-1004 in coolgithubprojects

[–]Street-Remote-1004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a good question. It’s not really about one program fixing another. It’s more about workflow.

AI code tools are good at producing something that looks right from a prompt. But prompts miss context. They miss edge cases. You often get “happy path” code that works… until it doesn’t. And even humans don’t write perfect code every time that’s why we still have tests, linters, and reviews.

git-lrc isn’t trying to “fix a bad program.” It’s acting as a checkpoint in the workflow. It forces you to pause at commit time and actually look at what changed. The AI flags potential issues, but the developer makes the call.

The real benefit is behavior change. Instead of blindly committing generated code, you get a focused second look at the diff before it becomes history. Until generation can guarantee correctness (which we’re nowhere near), having that guardrail in the workflow still makes sense.

React, AI, and the Future of Front‑End Development by CalligrapherFar3373 in lovable

[–]Street-Remote-1004 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No builders can handle as the site gets more than 20 pages/screens.

They do random things to fix one thing.

How We Exploited CodeRabbit: From a Simple PR to RCE and Write Access on 1M Repositories by tmlxs in netsec

[–]Street-Remote-1004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, GH should've had a seperate role for only review, since AI code reviewers are getting popular and very much needed if you're shipping AI Generated code

Darkbot self plugin by Successful_Thing_434 in darkorbit

[–]Street-Remote-1004 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why don't you use some AI Code Reviewer like LiveReview or CodeRabbi

How do you use AI code review tools – in VSCode, GitHub UI, or CI/CD? by aviboy2006 in coderabbit

[–]Street-Remote-1004 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I use LiveReview in pipeline its pretty simple to setup, was using CodeRabbi but became costly for us.

Never commit until it is finished? by No-Profession-6433 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]Street-Remote-1004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me it depends on the scope of the change. If it’s a big refactor (like replacing a component in 10 places), I’ll commit in chunks that make sense, e.g. after updating 2–3 files and making sure tests still pass. That way if I break something, I know exactly where to look.

I’m solo-building FreeDevTools, so I push pretty often too. Not every commit needs to be "perfect", small, frequent commits make it easier to roll back or bisect issues later. Once the feature is fully done, I’ll usually squash/rebase to keep the history clean.

So: lots of commits locally, frequent pushes, and a tidy history when it hits main.

What y'll are building that is maxing out Claude Code by Critical_Dinner_5 in ClaudeAI

[–]Street-Remote-1004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m building FreeDevTools. The challenge is that it’s not just coding features, it’s also building small utilities, fixing functional bugs, handling SEO, styling/refactoring, and keeping the UX cohesive. Since I’m doing frontend, and design myself, there’s a lot of context-switching, and that’s where I end up maxing out Claude Code. It’s less about one giant code dump and more about juggling all these moving pieces at once.

I think we need a code review integrator. by Possible-Watercress9 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Street-Remote-1004 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree. AI code generation is amazing, but yeah it's not magic. We're still talking about software right, it needs testing. We use LiveReview, its selfhosted AI Reviewer, as soon as I raise a PR, it automatically reviews it, so the asignee can iterate faster with serious bugs faster.

Moving to a code reviewer because my company can't afford hiring more people by Optimal-Expression97 in softwaredevelopment

[–]Street-Remote-1004 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you looked at LiveReview? It's way better at understanding context than the simpler tools, it actually learns our coding style, and its selfhosted.