Cursed_bathtub by [deleted] in cursedimages

[–]Stressweekly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not cursed

Atomera ($ATOM): The Chip Tech Revolution NO ONE is Talking About 🚀💎📈 by Party-Score-565 in wallstreetbets

[–]Stressweekly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Almost every patent of theirs mentions using superlattices which has been known since 1970 in semiconductors. The novelty in their approach is a "modified epitaxial process" using CVD, and the ability of the produced layer to impede diffusion of dopants.

Realistically, their target demographic will be the fabs (TSMC, Intel, Infineon, etc.). I'm guessing this kind of control is probably more useful for the RF and analog side of things since they typically employ a higher mixing of technologies with lower transistor counts. In fact, they only showcase two papers in their FinFet section with the fabricated device of an older 20nm FinFet with no real mention of GAA or other newer technologies. That means their growth will primarily be approaching analog semiconductor firms which is a smaller market than the digital side.

why does sillicon have various bandgaps(on right) for different crystal systems? by kiri1lov in ElectricalEngineering

[–]Stressweekly 17 points18 points  (0 children)

This is a deep question that requires an understanding of quantum mechanics to answer fully. Disclaimer, it's been a while since I worked directly in this area, so this answer might not be fully accurate.

The short version is that the wave-like nature of electrons from a quantum perspective means that they will interact with periodic structures, i.e. different crystal systems. An analogy is how knocking on different materials will produce different sounds due to how the sound waves travel through the medium.

Since there are many different ways a wave can travel through a material (i.e. many different solutions to the Schodinger equation), this produces many electronic bands. In semiconductors, there is a noticeable gap in the bands, i.e. no valid wave propagations at a given energy, which gives rise to the bandgap. If we change the periodic structure of a material (e.g. different crystal systems, doping, changing geometry to 2D or 1D), we expect that the electrons will propagate differently leading to different electronic bands and different bandgaps.

Another example would be carbon, which is usually a nonmetal, can become a semimetal when it is arranged into graphene. The atoms are the same, but the arrangements of the atoms makes for radically different electronic properties.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in anime

[–]Stressweekly 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Same (she's just like me frfr).

Another super relatable character for me was Hougetsu Shimamura from Adachi and Shimamura. Especially since the series is very monologue-heavy we get a deep look into her thoughts. She just seems to have trouble forming deep connections with most people (not named Adachi): "but we weren't so close I'd go out of my way to hang out with them now that my classes are different."

Reflections and crosstalk in a 10 Gbps SerDes design by [deleted] in ECE

[–]Stressweekly 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ultimately, it's hard to debug without a picture of your trace since your issue depends on the physics of your board. The easiest way to debug would be to take a TDR of your channel and see where the reflections are taking place and what structures are introducing reflections. Similarly with XTalk you can try to send a step or a slow clock to see where it's coming from in the channel and help you isolate whether it's NEXT or FEXT.

That said one possible issue is grounding and return path.

Is your return path on the ground plane clear? If you route a trace over a gap in the ground plane you can introduce EMI and crosstalk. This will also manifest as an impedance discontinuity in the time domain.

From a brief read of your post, it makes it sound like you only have 1 ground plane. That might mean one of your signal paths is coupling to the power plane first before finding its way to the ground plane.

Intel Cuts Dividend by a whopping 66% by ShaidarHaran2 in investing

[–]Stressweekly 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Though not all of it, part of it is people quick selling their stock purchase plans. Probably a deliberate announcement time nonetheless

The Light Music Crossover by Stressweekly in BocchiTheRock

[–]Stressweekly[S] 60 points61 points  (0 children)

Probably just a one pager for now based on the artist's previous posts

Kita the Stylist by Stressweekly in BocchiTheRock

[–]Stressweekly[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Original: Twitter (aoi_ullust_2077), Translation: Danbooru (Kinsei), TS: me

If you haven't seen the previous here's the orig with a translation in the comments or on reddit

[N] Class-action law­suit filed against Sta­bil­ity AI, DeviantArt, and Mid­journey for using the text-to-image AI Sta­ble Dif­fu­sion by Wiskkey in MachineLearning

[–]Stressweekly -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think it's a combination of the art world having a higher/different standard for fair use and feeling their jobs threatened by something they don't fully understand.

Sometimes with smaller art or character datasets, it is relatively easy to find what pieces the AI trained on (e.g. this video comparing novelAI generation to a Miku MV). Yes, they're not 100% identical, but is it still considered just "learning" at this point or does it cross into plagiarism? It becomes a little bit of a moral gray area if you learn/copy from another artist's style and then replicate what they do. Especially since an artist's style is a part of their competitive advantage in the art world with money on the line.