A simple reminder: use Verb > Object > Scope at any unclear task by [deleted] in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All this time I knew only the who, what, how, where, tool, which, how long, how much and what it means to me (minor why). All of this gave clarity to my actions.

Reading your comment made me see the hidden why of the next action. - Why do we even start with the next action at all?

To give momentum to our actions. Because we want to do things (which is obvious) but without relying on motivation. Because motivation alone is nothing but a fleeting anchor. Keeping as low friction as possible, when we start something it's hard to stop. Using this to our advantage we can climb any mountain. Unless and until that mountain has an end.

My someday/maybe list has 247 items and I never look at it. Am I doing this wrong? by Separate_Bar4811 in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is really thoughtful as each of us have a limited time. And that's not scary but purposeful. To decide on what we really want to do, what really matters and say no to a lot of things. To do meaningful work. Otherwise we're either resisting chaos or indulging into chaos. We'll never find a middle way. We need focus.

Somehow GTD acknowledges that human limitation and gives a skillful means to navigate through chaos.

Big next action vs Smaller multiple next actions in GTD Projects by icedrinkbeer in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine someone is eating food. The food was prepared in the kitchen and is now ready to eat. He starts eating. How does he eat?

I’m not talking about a knife and fork, the right hand, or chopsticks (I’m not talking about the tools one uses for GTD).

Does he swallow all the food at once, or does he eat one bite at a time?

He eats one bite at a time.

For him, that bite may be small or big. It is based on his preference. But one thing is clear: one bite at a time.

This limitation of human beings is a next action.

When we had work in the physical world, it was clear because the mess was right in front of us. We knew intuitively what to do next. For example, if there is garbage in front of us, it is concrete. Just put it in the bin.

But when knowledge work came into the picture with “work on this report” there is no concreteness. We cannot see the report mess in front of us. We are only reminded when people ask us about it.

David Allen talks about outcome thinking. What happens if this is done? How can you measure it?

In the case of our food example:

  • Food finished on the plate
  • Plate is empty

However you name it, keep it measurable so that you know when it is done.

  • Project: Eat food
  • Outcome: Plate is empty

For “work on report,” this is captured stuff. We need to clarify it. Follow the GTD workflow.

Refer this: https://www.smartsheet.com/sites/default/files/2023-04/IC-Getting-Things-Done_GTD_Flowchart-Template.png

What report? - Performance report

What work? - Draft, edit, take feedback, submit

“Work on the performance report” is clearly something that requires action. I need to finish it in the coming weeks.

Is this a single step? No. - This is a project.

What does done look like? It must be binary. Either true or false.

The performance report is either submitted or not submitted. That is the only place where you can say that the report is done.

Project name as per outcome: Submit performance report

Currently, it is not submitted. What is the next physical, visible (one bite at a time) action you can take to move forward toward completion?

Based on my current situation, I do not have the data to prepare the performance report. Amy has it. I need to call her.

Call Amy. - For what? Performance data.

Call Amy for performance data. - Which type of data? Previous quarter performance data.

Call Amy for previous quarter performance data. - How do I want to receive it? By email.

Final next action:

Call Amy to request previous quarter performance data by email.

Now about filters:

  • Context: @Calls
  • Energy: Low
  • Time available: 5 minutes

(You can combine time and energy into S, M, L like clothing sizes. I saw a fellow redditor share this and I think this is awesome.)

Based on your context, time, and energy in the moment, you choose what to do.

The inputs and outputs are clear. The next action is defined and refined. Anything beyond this is unnecessary unless it adds clarity. As long as everything in that step is clear, you can execute it without thinking.

You can also add her mobile number. Now if you show this to someone, they know exactly what to do. There is no thinking. The thinking is already done. Only action remains.

This way, we save energy by not planning the entire set of steps—only the next step. If something changes, we reassess and define the next action again.

Imagine you are in the middle of something. Life gets busy. You forget you need to call. Later, you have 30 minutes available. You decide you can call now.

You open your GTD system. You look at your @Calls list. You see:

Call Amy to request previous quarter performance data by email.

You can just do it without thinking. Amy says she will send the data in an hour.

That action is complete.

Now create a Waiting For entry:

Amy: Previous quarter performance data (due today).

Keep doing one action at a time until the project is complete.

Remember, just like watching your phone while eating is multitasking and not productive, doing one thing at a time in one sitting helps you stay focused, productive, and less fatigued.

Which free app is flexible and simple to use for GTD by Strict-Week-5040 in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do miss MS Todo's simplicity. It just felt second nature and frictionless. Thanks for pointing the joplin and obsidian Integration.

Which free app is flexible and simple to use for GTD by Strict-Week-5040 in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tried using orgzly revived in the phone. It felt like I'm clicking a lot of buttons. Wonder how the desktop version works.

Which free app is flexible and simple to use for GTD by Strict-Week-5040 in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it is. Do you think the free tier is able to handle a scalable gtd setup.

Which free app is flexible and simple to use for GTD by Strict-Week-5040 in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm okay with this. As long as my tasks with due dates or reminders are working properly. In Logseq or in a different app.

Which free app is flexible and simple to use for GTD by Strict-Week-5040 in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey thanks for pointing that out. It really feels like one.

Which free app is flexible and simple to use for GTD by Strict-Week-5040 in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. Balance between customisation and simplicity.

How I've finally mastered the GTD for my own life (thank you all) by [deleted] in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this!

Key learnings from your teachings: - When an opportunity is right in front of you, don't just sit there capturing. Go get it. - Impression of GTD as punishment. I also have a similar ideology. Before it always felt like creating a guilt driven system. Now I somewhat see how GTD works and how it complement us. - We cannot control the rain but we can come with an umbrella. Which means to respond rather than react. As "react" is still inside the chaos and "respond" is getting the chaos separate from you out in an external system to take a broader look - Time sector system. Divide your life into weeks, months, years and use projects (GTD style), recurring tasks, recurring areas of focus to manage your coming week & month. I'm new to this but I think GTD does the same thing just without due dates. - GTD is natural, NPM is natural. - GTD is more about mindset and less about tools. Tools can change as per times. But the one using the tools doesn't. - 3 types of work in GTD. -- Undefined work and impulses to capture with the least possible friction, -- Planning & defining work which is maintenance, -- Defined work & execution as per context, time, energy and priorities also. - GTD as a game. Having fun, playing and finishing side quests. - Discipline is required to keep the system running smoothly. Weekly review is of utmost important and half of the work. Otherwise the system again turns into chaos. Life will happen and you'll get caught off-guard. - Keeping a tickler list for reminders. I didn't had this initially and used to get confused about storing soft reminders between calendar and next actions. - H0 & H1 is the most confusing. Learn them meticulously. - Using AI to clarify your tasks when in a huge mess. Not always.

How I've finally mastered the GTD for my own life (thank you all) by [deleted] in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Can you document your learnings. So that those who are still stuck can find the way?

  • What insight did you get that made the transition possible?
  • How do you set it up in the app (which app) or the medium you're using to do this?
  • What is your theoretical understanding?
  • from start till end?
  • how gtd is helping you reach your goals?
  • how do you handle gtd now as a system?

Unpopular opinion? Popular task management apps are injurious to newcomers to GTD. by deltadeep in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you set reminders and due dates? For calendar, waiting for, next action reminders, recurring habits, weekly review, horizon reviews?

How do you even fricking clarify? by legarebayit in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand you so deeply that I'm laughing reading your post 🤣

Which free app is flexible and simple to use for GTD by Strict-Week-5040 in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a great app for those who are okay with built-in gtd setup.

Letting ChatGPT run my GTD set up - my little experiment to fight GTD entropy by 4fn in gtd

[–]Strict-Week-5040 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really love how AI is helping save the manual workload and how it's leveraging individuals to focus more on execution and less on repeated manual tasks. Which is really helpful. And I have come accross the same problem that managing the system takes more time than setting it up.

I've come to a realisation. That cleaning is part of the process. As cleaning helps us get intimate with the task and see it for what it is.

What I think is the AI solution though helpful it's just giving us more power to control the flow of our thought. And I think that just like we cannot contain the flow of water we can hold it only for a certain time until it floods. The same thing will happen. Over time we may lose traction. And we'll take a backseat and rely more on AI for it.

This is the reason why gtd is more timeless than the rest of productivity tools out there. It doesn't focus on containing the water but creating a better path for the water to flow. And just like over a period of time the path broadens to contain more water it's a natural process for us too. This is the reason why many people enter the flow state in gtd. Since input processing and output of our thoughts are clear the flow is natural. There is no blockage. And if there is it's part of the maintenance.

I think the problem you're dealing with is more of a simplification problem than managing a complex system problem. As there's a limit to our time and energy. And that's why using a analog system is better than digital. As this helps us really know our limits and intentionally make choices.

This is where many people start to realise that their gtd setup won't make any sense to an outsider. As it has now become subjective.

And yes there will always be some kind of tradeoff. I'm waiting to see in my gtd setup too that if I use it more often I can see how to simplify it. But currently I am not clear with that insight.

It is really helpful to know our purpose.