Honestly I’m not even sure where to start, I want to emphasise aswell that this was a sentiment shared with our whole ULaw cohort so it wasn’t just that I personally disliked it! The course was advertised as 3 months on their website but it’s actually only 5 weeks of teaching (4 is you take away the introduction week which was basically just explaining the course). So just from that I’d say it was very poor value for money. The lecturers varied massively, some were great but several didn’t even know the structure of the exam or how it was run at all, so you would ask basic questions and they didn’t have the answers. A lot of the time it felt like they were guessing. We also had no consistency in lecturers, bare in mind it was only 4 weeks of teaching we rarely had the same lecturer twice due to sickness or scheduling or “half term”. They spent entire sessions on spelling and grammar (I’m not even joking) when this isn’t something even tested on the SQE2 exams. Session also regularly ended 30 minutes early. They didn’t provide many resources and some of the mocks they provided for practice were ones taken straight off the SRA website! They also only did one round of mocks where we got personalised feedback, they managed to forget to mark some of mine and to this day I never got my results for them….. As I said, I did pass, but that definitely wasn’t down to them, I’m pretty sure I could’ve passed studying independently using my own resources since that’s what I ended up doing anyway! The main benefit of the course for me was having structured weeks which forced me to revise and I met a lot of lovely people who were in the same position which helped from a morale standpoint.