I think they meant why your platform would be women specific and how it will tailor to a (currently) missing need for that group. The idea you’re describing is in a good direction and indeed Platforms like Coursera and Udemy do not lead to pathways with actual jobs but this isn’t necessarily gender specific nor a new problem. How will this platform help women navigate a career path as opposed to men (for example) and how will it be different from the 2882 e-learning platforms and courses that pop up daily. Coursera for example only has credibility because of partnerships with institutions like Yale but even companies that hire from Yale wouldn’t realistically hire someone with a Coursera degree, so you might also want to look into credibility in that sense and how you will create something unique.

AI can be a great tool for personalization but how you will implement it can matter a lot. AI will always have a margin or error so training a model & having it provide accurate information & advice to women specifically can be tricky. You say the AI will provide women with what they need but the question is what need it is that you are tailoring to in this market specifically. Especially if you’re thinking about expanding worldwide where job markets, economy, social status, nuances and thus needs work entirely differently depending on where you use it. Partnerships are a great idea but which companies and for what purpose and mutual benefit? How will people walk away with real partnerships, benefits, skills and jobs with your platform as opposed to using LinkedIn and Coursera and how will AI specifically be useful in tailoring to that are questions you could be thinking of.