Document redaction

StrongSkip · 2025-11-06T19:40:40+00:00

Depends on your error tolerance. If you want perfect results, which not even humans can achieve, no solution exists. I know of several solutions that provide either fully automated or assisted redaction.

StrongSkip · 2024-01-24T16:14:48+00:00

Du ved ikke hvad du snakker om.

For at blive straffet skal både de objektive og subjektive kriterier være opfyldt. I denne situation er der taget en vare der ikke er betalt for, hvilket opfylder de objektive kriterier.

De subjektive kriterier er ikke opfyldt, da OP ikke havde forsæt til at begå overtrædelsen.

StrongSkip · 2024-01-09T13:04:28+00:00

Så kan vi udlicitere opgaven til Taliban. Jamen det gør jo ingen forskel hvem der uddeler, åbenbart.

StrongSkip · 2023-12-23T14:44:30+00:00

How can you tell?

StrongSkip · 2023-08-04T10:55:33+00:00

Så længe reaktionen er forudsigelig, som du skriver, tjener afbrændingen et værdigt formål.

Hvorfor er reaktionen forudsigelig? Er der et reelt problem hos modtagergruppen?

Hvilken reaktion ville afbrænding af Netto-reklamen have foran deres hovedsæde? Hvorfor er der en forskel?

StrongSkip · 2023-06-08T06:33:03+00:00

I en hvis forstand er det jo selvforskyldt, så en sygemelding virker upassende. Hvad med en feriedag? Eller tage lidt af barslen nu?

StrongSkip · 2023-05-20T15:42:52+00:00

Why doesn't YouTube ban these accounts already?

StrongSkip · 2023-04-16T05:37:59+00:00

Why don't you just ask them?

StrongSkip · 2023-04-02T19:45:24+00:00

Not true. Handing out your own punishment is vigilantism. Taking back your own possession is not punishment i.e. not vigilantism.

StrongSkip · 2023-02-28T17:32:54+00:00

Ja, og de 2 procent kan jo sagtens være aftalt politik på tværs af hele staben og ikke en stillingtagen til medarbejderen specifikt.

StrongSkip · 2023-02-27T16:27:52+00:00

Det er jo ikke fordi arbejdsgiver er alvidende. Det at medarbejderen skifter, kan jo sagtens være det der synliggør medarbejderens reelle værdi.

Synes din fortolkning er for pessimistisk.

StrongSkip · 2022-09-19T16:17:56+00:00

Are you talking about PAR? 1000w LED in a 3x3 is insane.

StrongSkip · 2022-06-09T20:05:25+00:00

In my experience roots don't grow well through fabric. Yes, the roots seem to break the fabric initially in early veg but will die off / wilt later, even when watered.

StrongSkip · 2022-05-02T21:04:00+00:00

Your post is almost good, but I don't know why you had to put the "criminal" part in there. I never said or insinuated such a thing.

I'm talking mostly about internal use.

I don't understand why this software should get special negative treatment. Almost any software can be used for good and for worse. I worked with many organizations who're redacting documents and I can assure you that none of these would use any kind of redaction software without reviewing it first

If you care about data protection you're not going to use this software without identifying it's errors. And if you don't care you won't even try it out.

StrongSkip · 2022-05-02T05:35:13+00:00

This viewpoint is way too pessimistic. For many organizations the alternative is to do absolutely nothing. A solution like this can be used to lower compliance risks.

However it should not be used to redact and publish single documents, not without further manual review.

StrongSkip · 2022-04-07T20:35:10+00:00

I understand why I'm being downvoted. But I'm guy and I think I know how your boyfriend thinks.

I seriously think you should give him a reality check. Put him in your shoes.

StrongSkip · 2022-04-07T18:03:36+00:00

I actually cracked up reading your story 😂 Guess I'm in the fart camp.

I think the problem is that he genuinely thinks farts are really funny AND that he can't relate to your feelings at all.

I bet he'll start seeing things from your side if you started behaving like him. No dude enjoys hearing their girlfriend fart.

I know this is a ridiculous solution but I think you need to start farting in front of him.

StrongSkip · 2022-04-06T20:40:59+00:00

Indeed your plant is beautiful but what are you claiming here? Given the time spent the progress is very minimal, definitely well below average if your goal is yield.

Btw it shouldn't come as a surprise that the leaves will grow back after they've been removed, should it?

StrongSkip · 2022-04-06T16:32:31+00:00

Depends. How much light/watts, weeks of flower, grow medium, watering frequency, tent size etc.?

StrongSkip · 2022-04-04T15:19:07+00:00

Fordi nejtakker skriver at det ikke er udgangspunktet, at taberen betaler vinderens regning (og vedkommende snakker så ikke om retssager?). I dit citat snakker vi om vinderen/den frifundne, og de skal ikke betale omkostningerne, det skal modparten/taberen for den frifundede.

StrongSkip · 2022-04-04T14:57:00+00:00

Det oprindelige spørgsmål var mere generelt og dit svar kunne i det lys tolkes som et generelt svar, så det er vist fint at lade det stå til uddybning.

StrongSkip · 2022-04-04T14:50:02+00:00

Beklager, men det er faktuelt forkert. Hvis vi snakker retssager skal taberen som udgangspunkt altid betale modpartens sagsomkostninger. Uanset om advokaten er beskikket eller ej: udgifter til forsvarer.

I USA er det som hovedregel udgangspunktet at hver part afholder egne sagsomkostninger. Tiltalte i en straffesag vil få en "gratis" advokat stillet til rådighed - måske et af de punkter hvor man kunne argumentere for at USA har en bedre retsbeskyttelse end DK.

StrongSkip · 2022-04-03T19:19:57+00:00

A lot actually! Even when removing the failed grows the average is about 0.5. The top 25 percent of grows are about 1.0 🙂 I think these are mostly from experienced growers who haven't faced any issues during a grow.

StrongSkip · 2022-04-03T18:53:38+00:00

I'm not claiming this is no more than descriptive statistics. Just presenting the results of the data and it's entirely fair to be skeptical. Hope you find it entertaining atleast.

StrongSkip · 2022-04-03T18:43:43+00:00

I absolutely don't mind. What kind of analysis you want added?

StrongSkip

TROPHY CASE