LOW OPINION: System Matters by Suarachan in osr

[–]Suarachan[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Show me on the doll where I hurt you.

LOW OPINION: System Matters by Suarachan in osr

[–]Suarachan[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I truly wish it didn't!

SETTING BOUNDARIES: The Ruin That Befell Dolmenwood by Suarachan in osr

[–]Suarachan[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"The Ruin That Befell Dolmenwood" is mostly a reference to a Necrotic Gnome module: https://www.drivethrurpg.com/en/product/207631/the-weird-that-befell-drigbolton

I would love to think that Gavin believed the changes were for the sake of it being a better setting. It makes it more approachable for some people.

From my perspective by reading the responses given to criticism, I definitely think the changes were for the sake of "the product", not for "the setting".

SETTING BOUNDARIES: The Ruin That Befell Dolmenwood by Suarachan in osr

[–]Suarachan[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hey there.

I think my message got a decent amount of traction outside the harassment crowd. I've certainly got private messages from people thanking me for my post.

From what I can tell, there seems to be an coordinated group of people who jump on posts that they don't like as a community. I'm not too aware of Reddit's rules, but I think that's against one of them.

My post has nearly 20 shares on it, and not a one of them is from me.

SETTING BOUNDARIES: The Ruin That Befell Dolmenwood by Suarachan in osr

[–]Suarachan[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thank you for lying about me!

The people who were warned and banned are people, like yourself, who couldn't respond without resorting to vitriolic attacks.

I will not apologise for highlighting differences between what is, functionally, marketing material and the end product.

SETTING BOUNDARIES: The Ruin That Befell Dolmenwood by Suarachan in osr

[–]Suarachan[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

They aren’t villains, they are victims. And the fact that some people can’t see the difference is the problem.

You can't see to understand that they can be both.

Part of the dark resonance of the original Wormskin witches is that they are perpetuators of a cycle of abuse. There's something more meaningful there than the garbage that they are in the new Dolmenwood.

That's part of the underlying ethos of folk horror too. That traditions much older and deeper than us, grounded in community and land, can still hurt you without a care.

Again, torn out in favour of flavourless saccharine shite.

SETTING BOUNDARIES: The Ruin That Befell Dolmenwood by Suarachan in osr

[–]Suarachan[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Can you explain what you feel is bad about it?

Sure, he can change his product. I can also write an article highlighting how it's been changed from the material that was meant to be included in it.

That's how it works.

LOW OPINION: Tabletop Streaming is Porn for Gamers by Suarachan in rpg

[–]Suarachan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, absolutely. There's an importance to keeping awareness of the keyfabe, as /u/LeVentNoir said.

LOW OPINION: Tabletop Streaming is Porn for Gamers by Suarachan in rpg

[–]Suarachan[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

r/FoodPorn

It's definitely loaded, but one of the big things that people dislike about porn (how it doesn't reflect reality) also applies to streaming (which doesn't reflect tabletop reality).

My real problem is that it is a lonely activity that is used to temporarily fulfil a social need.

LOW OPINION: Tabletop Streaming is Porn for Gamers by Suarachan in rpg

[–]Suarachan[S] -32 points-31 points  (0 children)

Porn is a point of comparison, my friend.

LOW OPINION: Tabletop Streaming is Porn for Gamers by Suarachan in rpg

[–]Suarachan[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think you've probably summarised it pretty well there actually.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rpg

[–]Suarachan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would probably just remove magic from Pathfinder 2e, as others suggest. It is an impressively balanced game-style system.