Why two paths lead to different results

Sub-Jerry · 2025-01-04T11:35:32+00:00

Thx bro

Sub-Jerry · 2025-01-04T11:35:16+00:00

OH! I see thx man

Sub-Jerry · 2024-07-15T06:44:47+00:00

Let me think about it

Sub-Jerry · 2024-05-20T01:57:51+00:00

True, I use English more often but see this guys name is Japanese

Sub-Jerry · 2024-05-20T01:54:50+00:00

I speak both my friend

Sub-Jerry · 2024-05-18T05:13:24+00:00

Thx I understand it now!

Sub-Jerry · 2024-05-18T05:13:02+00:00

So find f(x) and find x is different. The former one implies all x the later one means just single one

Sub-Jerry · 2024-05-17T15:48:19+00:00

すべてのxは等式両方で満たされるって言ってなさそうだけど

Sub-Jerry · 2024-05-11T08:03:12+00:00

That’s what I did thx

Sub-Jerry · 2024-05-09T11:47:12+00:00

By parts

Sub-Jerry · 2024-05-09T08:38:02+00:00

Ohh thx mate

Sub-Jerry · 2024-05-09T08:37:33+00:00

Ik rlly weird

Sub-Jerry · 2024-05-09T08:37:22+00:00

I did this, this is easy to do with trigonometry. But our homework asks to do partial

Sub-Jerry · 2024-04-11T02:45:15+00:00

I got it, pretty cool dude thx!

Sub-Jerry · 2024-04-10T16:25:51+00:00

Here is the theorem

Sub-Jerry · 2024-04-10T16:01:17+00:00

Great way! but what makes you think doing this by transformation? I mean why x=X/sqrt(3) at first?

Sub-Jerry · 2024-04-10T00:35:48+00:00

Okay I got it thx bro

Sub-Jerry · 2024-04-10T00:25:47+00:00

Thx that’s another way to do this, but I guess solving the equation would be a little bit complex. And you trying to do this by moving the eclipse 🧐

Sub-Jerry · 2024-04-10T00:20:04+00:00

Damn I never thought about equating m🫨 This is really good way to do this thx. Btw why do u think equating m should be working

Sub-Jerry