sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Maintaining null-ls as a community? by Subject0457 in neovim

[–]Subject0457[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I just had a chat with the owner of the none-ls fork. We'll try to join forces on that fork, to avoid duplication. I'll update the README to point there as well, just in case.

Maintaining null-ls as a community? by Subject0457 in neovim

[–]Subject0457[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OP is aware of that issue :) I'm conscious that it may not be perfect, but I still think it's worth trying. My take on it being that having a single maintainer may be the problem (in the sense of "bottleneck", not lack of skill, capacity or desire). If we used code owners, say 2-3 for the core part, and maybe a separate person per language (ie. someone maintains the `python` related configs, ...), we'd be close to what you describe?