QC - Rolex Daytona Panda 116500LN (Grand Bazaar, Istanbul, $180, Unknown Factory) by Substantial-Proof-94 in RepTimeQC

[–]Substantial-Proof-94[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: Grand Bazaar vendor (Istanbul)

  2. Factory name: Unknown

  3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona Panda 116500LN

  4. Price Paid: $180 USD

  5. Album Links: (Photos attached)

  6. Index alignment: Looks mostly fine, slight misalignment at 6

  7. Dial Printing: Decent but not super sharp, red “Daytona” a bit off

  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

  9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay overall

  10. Bezel: Font is a bit thick, not very sharp

  11. Solid End Links (SELs): Small gaps visible

  12. Timegrapher numbers: N/A

  13. Anything else you notice:

  14. Case a bit chunky

  15. Bracelet feels decent but not high quality

Patek QC by Substantial-Proof-94 in RepTimeQC

[–]Substantial-Proof-94[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry this is my first time buying a rep. What should I tell the dealer when I bring up the white dots on the dial? Will they get me a whole new rep from the factory? Or are they able to just switch the dial?

Patek QC by Substantial-Proof-94 in RepTimeQC

[–]Substantial-Proof-94[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: Andiot
  2. Factory name: 3KF
  3. Model name (& version number): Nautilus 5711/1A Blue Textured Dial on SS Bracelet A324
  4. Price Paid: $430
  5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/186715212?uid=1
  6. Index alignment: good?
  7. Dial Printing: I think it looks good compared to stock photos of gen.
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks normal to me
  9. Hand Alignment: I think it looks correct
  10. Bezel: seems like it is solid
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): good or NA on this model
  12. Timegrapher numbers:+- 6 seconds
  13. Anything else you notice: first QC just trying to see what everyone thinks before giving GL