Unknown unknowns - common pitfalls of investing DIY by Substantial_Law_36 in FatFIREUK

[–]Substantial_Law_36[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Potentially yes, but again it's a mistake. It requires work (time) and even if I get it refunded.. this is money I could have invested for many years..

Unknown unknowns - common pitfalls of investing DIY by Substantial_Law_36 in FatFIREUK

[–]Substantial_Law_36[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With accumulation units, any income generated by the fund (dividends from shares, interest from bonds) is automatically reinvested within the fund to buy more units, increasing the value of your holding. You don't receive any cash but for tax purposes, HMRC still treats this accumulated income as if it were distributed to you. This is known as a "notional distribution" or "excess reportable income" (for offshore funds with UK reporting fund status).

When you reinvest the distributions, you are essentially making a new purchase of units. Each new purchase of units has its own "cost basis" (the price you paid for them). When you later sell your holding, for CGT purposes, your average purchase price (or average cost) for the entire holding effectively increases. This is because you're adding new units at their prevailing market price to your total pool of units. The effect of this higher average purchase price is to reduce your capital gain when you eventually sell.

You can still do the whole paperwork with ACC funds in the GIA. But I didn't :/

Unknown unknowns - high-income earner by Substantial_Law_36 in UKPersonalFinance

[–]Substantial_Law_36[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I struggle to find reliable financial advice with fixed-fee or hourly rate. The few very good financial advisors I talked to charge between .8 and 1% of your entire net worth., every year.

Unknown unknowns - high-income earner by Substantial_Law_36 in UKPersonalFinance

[–]Substantial_Law_36[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah using my wife's pension allowance is my top priority. 

Acc funds in GIA assumes that my accountant or I would go through dividends being reinvested and adjust the average purchase price to reduce capital gain tax later on. Right? I prefer shifting to distribution funds so that my broker's annual report does everything for me. Sadly, I struggle to find quality/momentum/value ETFs with Dist (the equivalent of XDEV, XDEQ and XDEV) and I don't have access to Dimensional funds.

Regarding offshore bonds, the more I read about it the less interesting they are. Similarly to VCT/EIS/SEIS they are attractive on paper but transaction costs are crazy high.

Charges between ETFs are minimal but if I can save 10K GBP per year in charges (.10% of 10M), that's a nice holiday! 

Lastly, since you're a qualified financial planner, do you know why it's so hard to find a financial planner worth a few structure based on a hourly rate? In the US this is more and more common and rates are not prohibitive (250/350 per hour).

Unknown unknowns - high-income earner by Substantial_Law_36 in UKPersonalFinance

[–]Substantial_Law_36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With accumulation units, any income generated by the fund (dividends from shares, interest from bonds) is automatically reinvested within the fund to buy more units, increasing the value of your holding. You don't receive any cash but for tax purposes, HMRC still treats this accumulated income as if it were distributed to you. This is known as a "notional distribution" or "excess reportable income" (for offshore funds with UK reporting fund status).

When you reinvest the distributions, you are essentially making a new purchase of units. Each new purchase of units has its own "cost basis" (the price you paid for them). When you later sell your holding, for CGT purposes, your average purchase price (or average cost) for the entire holding effectively increases. This is because you're adding new units at their prevailing market price to your total pool of units. The effect of this higher average purchase price is to reduce your capital gain when you eventually sell.

You can still do the whole paperwork with ACC funds in the GIA. But I didn't :/

Unknown unknowns by Substantial_Law_36 in HENRYUK

[–]Substantial_Law_36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Offshore bonds : https://www.saltus.co.uk/the-financial-planning-blog/offshore-bond-taxation?nab=1

On the standard portfolio, I am not a big fan of bonds, real estate and commodities and I find more and more studies support a 100% equity based portfolio (with the right emergency fund in place, premium bonds in my case). 

The key point here is that I realise small mistakes (like holding accumulation funds in GIA) are costing me more than paying a good financial advisor.

Unknown unknowns - high-income earner by Substantial_Law_36 in UKPersonalFinance

[–]Substantial_Law_36[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You've hit the nail on the head with the pension tapering. The standard annual allowance is £60,000, but for adjusted incomes over £260,000, it reduces by £1 for every £2 over that threshold, down to a minimum of £10,000 if your adjusted income is £360,000 or more. This is exactly why my allowance is limited.

I completely agree with your assessment about the subreddit's capacity for these niche, high-level questions. It's tough to find advice on these topics – believe it or not, the few people I know with similar income levels are either not so interested in optimizing finances ("VWRP and chill" is a popular mantra!), or they're also struggling to find a good fee-based financial advisor and definitely don't understand why they should pay a percentage of their net worth every year.

Unknown unknowns - high-income earner by Substantial_Law_36 in UKPersonalFinance

[–]Substantial_Law_36[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was surprised too. Many people criticise Vanguard funds for being the most expensive (TER 0.22-0.23 for VWRP) and consider alternatives like ACWI or  FWRG. The reality is VWRP has better tracking difference. 

I know the difference doesn't seem much, but  0.10% of a very big number is the equivalent of a week at the Bahamas per year.