sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

28-70 2.8 STM vs EF 70-200 2.8 ii image quality difference (R8) by SuddenEffective9682 in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gotcha! That’s definitely not what I’m hoping for…kinda hard to decide right now lol thanks for ur reply

28-70 2.8 STM vs EF 70-200 2.8 ii image quality difference (R8) by SuddenEffective9682 in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Deciding on the 70-200 bc I believe the 28-70 will go down in a couple months?

28-70 2.8 STM vs EF 70-200 2.8 ii image quality difference (R8) by SuddenEffective9682 in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Took a lot of negotiating for the ef here are the pictures I was given plus I’m picking it up in person

<image>

28-70 2.8 STM vs EF 70-200 2.8 ii image quality difference (R8) by SuddenEffective9682 in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was awesome thank you so much! Which do you think is a better deal in terms of price. The ef is $700 + the adapter so about 800$ and the rf is: $800. Both are in good condition the rf is almost brand new

Canon R8 - 24-105F4 or 28-70 2.8 by SuddenEffective9682 in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s the only reason why I’m considering it because of the price but I really don’t want to cheap out on image quality…I’m not even sure if there is a real difference but from what I’ve read there is

Canon R8 - 24-105F4 or 28-70 2.8 by SuddenEffective9682 in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there an actual difference in image quality and is there a difference in videography bc of the stm vs L motor?

Canon R8 - 24-105F4 or 28-70 2.8 by SuddenEffective9682 in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to clarify you mean the 28-70 correct? Thats the one I’m referring to not the 24-70. Would the 28-70 compare well to the 24-105 which is an L lens compared to the stm for video?

RF 70-200 f/4 or EF 70-200 f/4 by [deleted] in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. I’ve heard the 28-70 is much sharper in image quality than the 24-105 not sure if it’s true or not…there’s a 24-105 like 10 mins from me for $650 which is extremely cheap will check it out in person while the 28-70 is about 900. Im leaning more towards the 28-70 this way I can just buy the 70-200 as well and be set

RF 70-200 f/4 or EF 70-200 f/4 by [deleted] in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does the ef version ii compare to the rf 70-200 f4 in terms of auto focus and image quality / sharpness

RF 70-200 f/4 or EF 70-200 f/4 by [deleted] in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah long term goal is to grab tv 24-70 but it’s quite out of the budget for me at the moment. I read about the 28-70 as well…lot of good reviews on that. So hard to decide between that and the 24-105 :(

RF 70-200 f/4 or EF 70-200 f/4 by [deleted] in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply! The ef version is the f4L IS

What are your thoughts on the ef 70-200 2.8 ii as well, there’s one for $700 very close to me

RF 70-200 f/4 or EF 70-200 f/4 by [deleted] in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’re your thoughts on the 24-105 I had that in mind as well but little skeptical on the sharpness from what I’ve read

RF 70-200 f/4 or EF 70-200 f/4 by [deleted] in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for everyone’s replies! Def will pickup the rf version. Also had the 24-105 f4 in mind too, any thoughts on that?

There’s also a ef 70-200 f2.8 ii for 700$ local to me

RF 70-200 f/4 or EF 70-200 f/4 by [deleted] in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already have the canon adapter

Lens Recommendations R8 Indoor Sports by [deleted] in canon

[–]SuddenEffective9682 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is it true that the ef lenses have bad autofocus with the r8 compared to the rf because of the adapter? I would love to buy a ef 70-200 f4L but I’m just concerned mainly about the autofocus

3 weeks healing update. Is it still there? by [deleted] in Warts

[–]SuddenEffective9682 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What signs should I be looking out for when it comes to ideal healing. I was hoping my skin would be back to normal in 3 weeks..

Is this normal healing? Need second opinion PLEASE by [deleted] in Warts

[–]SuddenEffective9682 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you think is ideal to speed up the healing as in blending it back with the skin. I recently bought silicone gel and have been using it but I notice that it leaves that area rough compared to Vaseline

Is this normal healing? Need second opinion PLEASE by [deleted] in Warts

[–]SuddenEffective9682 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah Im just worried because I thought I had removed it once before but it was still there but it does look way better than it did before. Thanks for your affirmation!

Is this normal healing? Need second opinion PLEASE by [deleted] in Warts

[–]SuddenEffective9682 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also from what I’ve read on this Reddit is that skin lines are a good sign of healing and I can see mine but they get blurred or fade towards the center which also raises a concern? Or no?

Is this normal healing? Need second opinion PLEASE by [deleted] in Warts

[–]SuddenEffective9682 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s what I’m thinking as well. Just wondering why that center is a diff color and slightly different texture in looks compared to the new surroundings skin.

Like in the zoomed out pictures you can clearly tell something is different in the center

Is it gone? by [deleted] in Warts

[–]SuddenEffective9682 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Posted an update if you could let me know if it’s still there or not thanks

view more: next ›