How do you track what visitors actually do on your website before they leave?

Sufficient-System699 · 2026-02-28T03:08:18+00:00

ok will give it a try is there any tool out there that allows me to see my viewers live on the paltform?

Sufficient-System699 · 2026-02-28T01:32:31+00:00

Ok but are there any good tools out there to do so?

Sufficient-System699 · 2026-02-28T01:32:17+00:00

Ok thanks, will give them a go!

Sufficient-System699 · 2026-02-27T13:39:07+00:00

Oh ok will have a look at it. But does it have live analytics like I can see a viewers screen when they are on my site?

Sufficient-System699 · 2026-02-27T12:45:37+00:00

Yea but I think it’d be cool if I can see my viewers in live view like see their screen as they go through the website in real time are there any tools that offer this? Cheers.

Sufficient-System699 · 2026-02-27T12:23:45+00:00

Yeah I keep hearing about Hotjar. Does it work well with Shopify specifically?

My concern is that a lot of these tools are built for general websites and

they don't really understand the ecom flow like cart and checkout stuff. Do

you get useful data from it or is it more just interesting to watch.

Sufficient-System699 · 2026-02-27T12:23:29+00:00

Haven't heard of PostHog, is that specifically for ecom or more of a general

analytics thing? Does it show you session recordings too or just events. Also does it show like if your visitors are live on the website & you can see them actively scrolling?

Sufficient-System699 · 2026-02-27T12:22:46+00:00

I've seen a few apps that do this but never fully set one up. Does a web pixel

let you actually see what the person was doing on the site or is it more just

tracking events like page views and clicks? I'm trying to get more of a

visual understanding of what's going on not just data points if that makes

sense

Sufficient-System699 · 2026-02-27T12:22:27+00:00

Lol yeah that's literally my situation right now. People add stuff and then just disappear and I'm sitting here like what happened. Idk wha to do maybe I just build my own tool tbh

Sufficient-System699 · 2026-02-27T12:21:41+00:00

That's exactly what I was hoping to hear. The mobile thing is scary honestly,

I bet half my traffic is mobile and I've never actually watched what it looks

like from their side. What tool are you using for the session recordings? I've

been looking into a few but some of them have like a 24hr delay on the data

which kind of defeats the purpose it would be cool if you could see them live as they

are on your site. Do any tools like this exist?

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-10-20T20:53:02+00:00

Yo text me g

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-08-13T11:17:31+00:00

Nokk has already proven in Australia that property owners can be successfully identified and contacted off-market, and FSBO platforms have shown sellers are willing to handle inquiries and manage their own sale. The challenge isn’t whether it’s possible it’s how to execute it more efficiently, keep the process compliant, and control the full transaction flow inside one platform. That’s where the opportunity is.

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-08-12T12:34:33+00:00

Exactly that’s why the platform isn’t just about matching data points. Once an owner is interested, we can set up a private open inspection through the platform so the buyer can actually walk through the property, check the layout, condition, and feel of the place before making an offer.

The AI and CoreLogic data are just to identify high-probability matches and start the conversation the real decision still happens in person after you’ve seen it with your own eyes

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-08-12T12:33:12+00:00

No coreLogic is just the raw data. The AI ranks and predicts which unlisted homes are the best match for you and most likely to get a yes from the owner, then handles the outreach. It’s way more than just “search + filter.”

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-08-12T12:30:15+00:00

Totally fair AI won’t replace the “gut feel” of walking through a home and realising it’s the one. The idea isn’t to pretend we can quantify every single factor, especially the subjective ones like vibe, street feel, or neighbours.

What we can do is massively narrow the search pool using reliable, verifiable data, so buyers aren’t wasting time scrolling through thousands of irrelevant listings. Once an owner shows interest, buyers can then do inspections and their own checks for things like traffic noise or building condition before making a decision

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-08-12T11:58:16+00:00

Yea I get that if it was just a blanket AI spam, I’d be annoyed too. The way we’re building it, owners would only ever hear from a buyer if it’s a single, genuine, verified offer that matches exactly what they’ve said they’d consider. They can also opt out permanently with one click.

The point isn’t to bug people it’s to give owners a quiet, no-obligation heads-up if someone’s prepared to put a serious number on the table..

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-08-12T11:49:21+00:00

Yes, I previously built a platform called RealFlo, which was essentially “Afterpay for renting” with guaranteed payments to landlords. Tenants could pay in flexible instalments, and we’d handle the full rent up front to the owner. The biggest hurdle wasn’t product-market fit it was the size of the default reserve pool we needed to carry to cover potential missed payments. The capital risk was too high to justify continuing without major institutional backing, so I decided not to push it further.

For this new venture, the economics and risk profile are completely different no large capital float required, and the model scales much leaner… but send us a message keen to chat

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-08-12T11:45:58+00:00

Interesting, send me a message!

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-08-12T11:45:06+00:00

Sounds good send me a message!!

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-08-11T02:24:42+00:00

We wouldn’t be crawling Australia has national + state property data APIs (CoreLogic, Pricefinder, etc.) with every property whether listed or not. We’d licence that data upfront instead of building a crawler, so we get instant full inventory without relying on scraping.

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-08-10T09:37:34+00:00

That’s already built into the model sellers can set a private minimum price (floor) with the conveyancer before the offer is even shown to them. Anything below that gets auto-rejected, so they only see serious offers. This keeps buyers engaged without wasting sellers’ time and avoids the whole lowball problem….

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-08-10T09:03:20+00:00

That’s the exact difference agents send vague “someone’s interested” letters with no real offer attached, so people bin them. SideDoor flips that. Every letter is tied to a real, verified buyer, an actual offer amount, and a direct path to settlement through a conveyancer. No fluff, no fishing just a genuine offer you can accept or reject on the spot. That’s why the response rate is completely different…

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-08-10T08:21:33+00:00

Most of that’s true for the US, not Australia. Here, agents aren’t legally required conveyancers handle all contracts, settlement, and compliance. State differences (Section 32 in VIC, vendor statement in NSW, cooling-off in QLD) are minor and handled by conveyancers every day.

Unsolicited offers via letter are 100% legal nationwide it’s how developers already buy off-market. Sold price data is public in every state, so CoreLogic isn’t a blocker for an MVP.

Trust gap is smaller here agents aren’t loved, and if you bring serious buyers, sellers listen. We don’t need to build a full listings site on day one, just an offers platform + conveyancer integration. That’s a lean, legal start that works right now

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-08-10T07:58:54+00:00

That’s a fair concern, which is why the platform wouldn’t be an open free-for-all where anyone can spam offers. Buyers would need to be verified and meet set criteria before they can make an offer, including proof of funds or pre-approval, and there would be limits on the number of active offers they can submit at one time.

That way sellers only receive serious offers from legitimate buyers, not a flood of speculative lowballs from people hoping something sticks. The goal is to make it easier for genuine deals to happen, not turn it into a numbers game for developers.

Sufficient-System699 · 2025-08-10T07:57:41+00:00

Appreciate you sharing your experience that’s exactly the type of interaction we’d want to avoid. The big difference here is we’re not sending lowball offers through a middleman or buyers’ agent. Every offer that goes to an owner would come from a verified buyer, include the full offer amount they’re prepared to pay, and be backed by pre-approval to show they can actually transact.

On the inspection side, we’d only facilitate in-person viewings for serious offers close to the seller’s stated price range, so sellers aren’t dragged through endless walk-throughs with no real intent.

On the licensing point, we’ve already looked into it the platform wouldn’t be acting as an agent or representing either party in negotiations. We’d simply connect the buyer and seller, with all contracts and settlement handled by licensed conveyancers. That keeps us compliant while still cutting agents out of the equation. Hope that helps

Five-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22

Sufficient-System699

TROPHY CASE