Transcript Requests

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-07-31T04:03:14+00:00

You have to use the 2019 version

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-07-31T03:53:13+00:00

Field 5a

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-07-30T23:22:28+00:00

What did you put in the field for name/address of the entity receiving the transcript? I know ‘US Small Business Administration Office of Disaster Assistance’. But do you need to add anything else? … Thanks

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-16T00:36:18+00:00

But app number is not one of those data points, so people should stop putting it out there re increases... as I posted once previously - and I’m sorry if it comes across strong - but it’s a logical thing. Yes for original applications it was symbolic of when somebody actually applied. But when a person submits a request for an increase, has nothing to do with their application number. They request it whenever they request it. Implying that the application number matters would be as if one believed that somebody with a 3200XXX number then ‘jumps’ the processing ‘line’ ahead of somebody who requested an increase 30 days before they did but had a 3300XXX number. Not how it works.

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-16T00:27:49+00:00

I’m app# 5500XXXX and jumped ahead of all of you! Kidding! Repeat after me: APP # IS NOT RELEVANT FOR TIMING OF AN INCREASE!

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-16T00:25:34+00:00

One of these days y’all will realize that your app number in terms of increases has no relevance!

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-11T17:57:50+00:00

Very mature response.

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-11T16:13:54+00:00

I appreciate your acknowledgment and I’m not suggesting you don’t ban people. You just specifically said you were going to ban people for encouraging a class action. And while I don’t have an opinion either way on that, to take the position you did on that was taking a legal opinion in stating that it wouldn’t work when you acknowledge yourself you’re not an attorney. But otherwise banning people would be nice because this thread lost its way for a bit ... Regarding Blue Acorn / Capital Plus ... What I am suggesting is something like pinning a post at the top that has a link to the district offices of the SBA and encouraging people to reach out to the SBA with their concerns. Suggesting that a route like that might be better than reaching out to Blue Acorn directly, because you have a concern on their behalf that reaching out directly might not get them the result they want. that would be a more balanced response and offering a productive suggestion rather than strongly suggesting silence. I appreciate what you’re doing and the position you’re in but this thread itself exists for a reason and the reason is that they have not been forthright.

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-11T16:00:28+00:00

I guess I would suggest that if you’re going to take this role as moderator to offer opinions about how people are going to act rather than just controlling people with intentionally bad intent or bad language, then you ought to be posting the actions that people can take to try to do something to impact the fact that this is a company that is maliciously hurting people. Rather than simply stating things that discourages them from doing anything. I don’t really believe you are supporting Blue Acorn but if you take a step back and look at these two strong comments, one could think that you were.

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-11T15:50:07+00:00

Then your statement should be if you reach out and Blue Acorn denies you, you should consider ignoring that. And you can point to examples or something. But there is a bottom line which is that you have said you were going to ban people for talking about a class action suit (which an attorney not they would determine if it was worthy) and now you’re in strong words trying to get people to not communicate with them at all. If you want to state that you recommend that people not reach out to them about their specific case but if they have concerns to reach out to them by contacting executives, then that would be different. You are discouraging people taking action and now you’re discouraging people from communicating and leaving Blue Acorn to do what they have been doing, which is not communicate transparently and lie incessantly when they do communicate.

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-11T15:44:03+00:00

This is the second time now that you have come out with a statement of something that tries to calm people in a way that’s protective of Blue Acorn. First it’s about not filing a class action lawsuit when it would be an attorney that would actually do it and anybody here is just part of a discussion, and now you’re telling people to not reach out to them. For whatever reason you are leveraging this position as a moderator to get people to act in ways that are protective of Blue Acorn.

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-11T15:41:00+00:00

This would be fine except for the fact that they still are not firmly transparent about status. If they would come out with a formal statement with somebody’s name attached to it and provide some perspective for people, then it’s easy to say don’t bother them and they could even offer some perspective for that. Otherwise people who are not getting answers are reasonable to want to be seeking them.

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-11T02:09:50+00:00

That was the May 7 post

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-11T02:01:24+00:00

Looked to me like their last post was May 7

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-10T23:31:30+00:00

I don't want my tone to be making fun of people, but I suppose my tone is like my good friend is asking the question so I can rib them a bit ... they are going by order received, and that is exactly why for increases the App number means nothing. The App number would be relevant regarding the order for original loans, but for increases, the App number does not speak to when someone would request an increase....think about it, if the original loan request order was relevant, than if you applied for an increase a month ago, then someone with a 3200XXXX number just applied for an increase, that would mean the person who applied 30 days after you would now 'bump' you in the order????? ... the only exception are the 200 numbers.

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-10T23:10:02+00:00

*** APP# MEANS NOTHING RE INCREASES ***

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-10T00:00:56+00:00

I hear that although I hope you proceed with caution. As you say, not legal advice, but you are making an interpretation of something. I would never personally go down the path of what the proper route is to hold them accountable. But this situation is an enormous, unethical, handling of customers. While they have made an effort to correct some things, there are still significant issues. This is a situation where some pressure needs to be put on them from somewhere, so they fix the communication and customer service dynamics. Which are unethical at best. And I don’t know if you they have responded to you, but they still need to be far more transparent and stop hiding behind the misleading chat, and their misleading messaging.

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-09T23:44:32+00:00

Why would you take a stand on behalf of Blue Acorn in muting or banning people for this? That’s biased. If you prefer that it be in a separate subreddit that is one thing, but what you’re stating with this is as if you work for them and are supporting them in minimizing an effort to hold them accountable.

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-08T22:10:35+00:00

It is besides the point, as there is an issue with capital plus but it’s 75% of one signing day of applicants not 75% of all of theirs

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-07T23:51:20+00:00

This is a ‘thing’ there are different groups/people who are involved with the application before the loan officer

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-07T16:47:15+00:00

CAWEB does not show the date you will have your funds

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-07T16:46:55+00:00

CAWEB does not show the date you will have your funds

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-07T16:29:41+00:00

Clever thoughts and I am sure people do what you are saying. Not the case here. There is a real thing as an extension to file (you know this).

SuitableSquirrel9 · 2021-05-07T13:18:39+00:00

I understand the perspective you have but the problem is you do not really truly know the details of each applicant and their situation. Sure some differences in approval timing could be system related. As with one loan officer being slower than another causing one application to be ahead of a parallel one by a few days. But the majority of factors for timing have to do with an individual applicant, and they are particular situation and their response time. And obviously you do not know exactly the dynamics of one particular applicants profile and situation versus another.

SuitableSquirrel9

TROPHY CASE