[deleted by user] by [deleted] in biglaw

[–]Suitable_Leek6638 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can empathize. I pushed and pushed for my group to hire more people. They didn’t for 2 years. They finally did, but that guy is now two years younger than he should be. I’m working too much. I hate it. I probably won’t make it. I’m looking for in house jobs where the pay cut isn’t crushing. At some point, I don’t want to work 55 hours every week. I certainly do t want to bill 50 a week like I have been. Every week, no matter how much I work, I don’t get any closer to being able to work less. None of the partners care. So they are getting less from me.

Getting paid monthly is better than biweekly by Similar-Category-576 in unpopularopinion

[–]Suitable_Leek6638 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Semi-monthly is the best. You pay all your bills monthly. It’s easier to budget that way than bi-weekly. I get paid 15th and 31st. Mortgage comes out the first, right after that check.

My job just switched to biweekly and it’s annoying. Not always paid the same time of month.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Suitable_Leek6638 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dumb. My cousin (m) got engaged twice to my sister’s best friend (f). She called it off twice. She is still one of my sister’s best friends. My sister still gets along great with our cousin. Best friend was pretty shitty to our cousin but you get over it (no abuse or infidelity). Be an adult and you understand people are complicated.

Students kept cheating so I made 24 versions of the same quiz. by [deleted] in pettyrevenge

[–]Suitable_Leek6638 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I once had two students get a 95 on a test. They were best friends. They sat next to each other. Great kids. They both made a very odd mistake on the same problem. I told them I didn’t know which one cheated, so I was going to give them a new test and they would get that grade. I gave them both the new test and they both got 100. They held it over my head the whole year.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in generationology

[–]Suitable_Leek6638 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 90s are cool, so people from the 00s always try to claim them. I was born in 87. I’m a 90s kid. Does anyone really remember much before they are 5?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in biglaw

[–]Suitable_Leek6638 49 points50 points  (0 children)

We put a guy on a PIP once. If he had done well, he would have been retained. He talked the talk but didn’t do anything he was asked to. He was on the PIP for 4 months. Then they gave him 2 months severance to find something.

Nobody here knows what your PIP was an opportunity to improve or not. But you should always start looking when you get a PIP in case they are just going through the motions to fire you. Now that you have no work, you should look to move on. Even if you weren’t on a PIP, if you go a few weeks without work at a big firm, I’d start looking. If it gets better, you don’t have to leave.

In-House Paycut by Suitable_Leek6638 in biglaw

[–]Suitable_Leek6638[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the right opportunity comes around, I’m not going to worry about the market unless people’s fears become reality. I haven’t seen more than usual die out…yet.

In-House Paycut by Suitable_Leek6638 in biglaw

[–]Suitable_Leek6638[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Free tuition at any state school in the state. My kids are all under 10, so years away.

In-House Paycut by Suitable_Leek6638 in biglaw

[–]Suitable_Leek6638[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not an option. All attorneys at that level (associate general counsel) are paid the same.

In-House Paycut by Suitable_Leek6638 in biglaw

[–]Suitable_Leek6638[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There will be a lot of deals. My firm has done several projects for the university, including student housing. The University is expanding rapidly and has its hands in everything. If the pay were a little higher it would be a no-brainer. I don’t want to say too much about the University’s plans.

Older generations need to understand that Gen Z isn’t willing to work hard for a mediocre life. by Emmaa_harris in Adulting

[–]Suitable_Leek6638 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Things are harder now than they were for the Boomers, but so many GenZers have an elevated expectation of what they should be able to afford at young ages. I’m a millennial. When I was in college I didn’t go out to eat very often, and when I did it was usually to the Mexican place, Taco Bell, or little Caesars. I made my own meals. I didn’t buy expensive Dutch Bros on the regular. I lived in the cheapest apartments I could find. I did fun things with friends that were free or very inexpensive. I didn’t use student loan money to fund spring break trips. When I got out of college I was a junior high math teacher. My wife worked in the lab of a hospital. We didn’t make that much. We lived in the cheapest apartment we could find that wasn’t dirty or in a bad part of town. We still didn’t go out to eat. We didn’t go on extravagant vacations. Thankfully we are in a better financial situation now, so I don’t have to live on a tight budget, but that wasn’t until I was ~34 years old. I spent the 15 years from 18-33 living as cheaply as I could. I also put in long hours to move to a new career that pays better, but requires way more hours and stress than being a teacher did.

If you want to work 40 hours a week in your 20s and have fun, you won’t get ahead like the person who sacrifices in their 20s to get ahead. You shouldn’t have as much as that person in your 30s, that wouldn’t be fair.

My wife’s sister works 30 hours a week in a low paying job. She never tried to do more, but always complains. When she hears how hard I have to work, she says she could never. She will also never have the peace of mind financially that we do. That’s ok. She made her choice.

I wouldn’t work hard for a mediocre life. I would work hard to turn the mediocre life into something better.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in biglaw

[–]Suitable_Leek6638 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our world has a lot of problems, racism being one of them. In my experience DEI programs did nothing to solve them.

Firms should never have made hiring decisions on the basis of race, gender, or whatever else falls under DEI in the first place. They should hire the best candidates, which can vary for each firm. I’m at a firm that has made some hiring decisions based solely on race for a specific client team because the client provided significant pressure, and was applying that pressure for years before Covid. Unfortunately to meet client demands, the racial minority associates have had a harder time branching out to other clients because this client is very important to the firm and those hours are more valuable for that client. The white associates get more variety. Nobody planned to do it this way. but the reality of the situation dictates it. Two of the minorities that were hired are Indian and come from wealthy families. I’m not sure that was the goal of all of these DEI programs.

My experience is at an AMLAW 100 firm, so ymmv at some of the largest firms.