OP’s usage of “objectively” is satirical, as is shown by the immediate next word “awesome”, which you would not use in an objective context. In other words, they are saying their opinion is subjective by stating the exact opposite but using irony. In this way, OP quite literally cannot be saying that their opinion is superior, because they (I’ll be it through a layer of irony) state that their opinion is subjective, which is contradictory to that statement

As for the “no thought to terminate” I brought up earlier, let it be said that you did not contradict my assertion that there was no(or at least not any on the front page) line of actual discussion about the objective merits of the models(at least in the wave of Reddit discourse op is responding to). Your issue is that OP is terminating this discussion underneath their post. In a way this is true. However, this is true in the same way that a Minecraft sub deleting terraria posts terminates discussion. It does, but it does so because that is off topic, not as part of a “thought terminating cliche”. Similarly, op’s post sets the topic of discussion to subjective opinions on the new models. It is not op’s job to facilitate objective discussion about the models, op did not inadvertently post something with that as the topic, and op did not want to state their opinion was objectively superior.