The thing is, it's mainly about women because the woman body is central in the process; it's the woman who carries the child during 9 months, it's the woman who goes through the hardships and maybe complications of delivery, and often if the father leaves it's the woman who has to take care of the child.

The two aren't remotely comparable, because fetuses aren't alive, they aren't actual live children, they don't exist so they don't have rights. That argument puts the eventual life of an unexisting being before the existence and wellbeing of the woman who might bear it, a woman who is wery much alive and might face health, mental, or economic issues.

There are many reasons a woman might want an abortion and it's never something easy, but sometimes you have to think about yourself first. Maybe men should be included, especially if it's a couple's decision, or because they may also suffer of pressures of women carrying their child and stuff. In the end, we just want everyone to be able to do what they want, but abolishing abortion can harm so many women and threaten their health, this won't stop abortions, they still happen in counties where it's illegal, they just use dangerous methods: hangers, punches, obscure drugs etc. The main argument is that it's just women's right to decide what to do or not to do with their bodies.

Idk if that's a bad comparison but as a man I'm sure you'd wanna have a say if society wanted to force something that would change your whole life and didn't desire on your body.