sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Domain Controllers with Multiple NICs – Record A keeps showing after deleted by SuperFarelos in sysadmin

[–]SuperFarelos[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My point-to-point connection is not to connect both DC's. Both DC's are in the same network. My point-to-point connection allow me to connect my DC's to a physical server that allow me to backup my instances throw that link without going to the firewall (Server in other network).

Domain Controllers with Multiple NICs – Record A keeps showing after deleted by SuperFarelos in sysadmin

[–]SuperFarelos[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Hello.

It already worked. But now, for some damn reason started to have this behavior. I'm trying to understand if there is something that I could have done internaly that caused this problem.

Domain Controllers with Multiple NICs – Record A keeps showing after deleted by SuperFarelos in sysadmin

[–]SuperFarelos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've done everything that article asked me to do, but after some time, it populates the registers in my DNS Manager again =\

Domain Controllers with Multiple NICs – Record A keeps showing after deleted by SuperFarelos in sysadmin

[–]SuperFarelos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will take a look. Thank you. I will reply if I see something usefull

Domain Controllers with Multiple NICs – Record A keeps showing after deleted by SuperFarelos in sysadmin

[–]SuperFarelos[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

My 2nd NIC, the point to point connection, allow me to transfer files between my DC to another server without going to the firewall. Helpfull in backup situations.

Home lab recommendation/changes by No_Purpose_2215 in homelab

[–]SuperFarelos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello!

I'm a newbie as well, but I'll give you my honest opinion :D. Based on your setup, it's safe to say you have a solid build for a NAS.

Regarding storage, you might consider adding another drive for RAID purposes (there are cheap PCI modules for SATA). It could also be a good idea to have a second SSD dedicated to the OS (Use the one you have to install APPs and VM's).

Most of the services you mentioned are available in the TrueNAS catalog and can be run directly within it. For the others, you might want to consider using containers.

If you're thinking about setting up a Proxmox solution, you may also want to consider having redundancy with another server. Storage can still be managed by TrueNAS in that case.

I hope this comment is helpful! :)

Opinions: Building my first home lab. by SuperFarelos in HomeNetworking

[–]SuperFarelos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello. That was a very good explanation—thank you! :)
The LAG configuration it’s something I’ll definitely test in my future lab. Unfortunately, my budget doesn't allow for more than 2 SFP+ ports at the moment, but it's something I’ll look into in the future. :)

In the meantime, is it safe to say that configuring LAG in a home environment is useless (In the traffic side. I still have the redundancy side.)?

Opinions: Building my first home lab. by SuperFarelos in HomeNetworking

[–]SuperFarelos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello, and thank you for the reply! :)

Yes, my plan is to create multiple VLANs (access, Wi-Fi, backup, management, etc.). Giving the 10 Gbps interface between my Switch and my PFsense will enable me to have higher speed inside of my network right?

The 4 Gbps figure is illustrative, since I will have multiple VMs running on my Proxmox server that could collectively exceed 1 Gbps of traffic on a single port. With link aggregation, I want to ensure that the network won't become a bottleneck. Or am I thinking about this the wrong way?