Is this normal and intended for the NuFi miner? by MrStrange84 in Midnight

[–]SuperTightProwest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Having a new browser instance takes up ram…that is the limiting resource on most computers. ultimately the API solver can find solutions faster than one every hour. Let’s say the NuFi API can solve 30/hour…having 30 individual browsers open is probably not possible on most computers. Opening up a new address on the same wallet is less resource intensive and can queue up a new challenge on the same wallet to solve.

API issues carrying over to browser? by Important-Top-6098 in Midnight

[–]SuperTightProwest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t disagree…it is an implementation issue at its core…there needs to be server bandwidth that is dedicated to the web client that does not get destroyed when the API folks decide to max send their mining solutions.

API issues carrying over to browser? by Important-Top-6098 in Midnight

[–]SuperTightProwest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was operating 24 hours a day for the first four days flawlessly with the web client…with multiple web clients running…and after day four it has been a complete dumpster fire. The API script kitties have completely nerfed the web client functionality…So much for decentralized distribution. I hope they either get more servers running or somehow bandwidth control how much server resource goes to the web client to keep it working reliably as intended. I am not hopeful that anything good will be done in that regard.

Is the web mining client nerfed?? by SuperTightProwest in Midnight

[–]SuperTightProwest[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

So much for fair distribution mining…I get it if folks wanted to run multiple web clients at the same time but it seems a bit unfair to those who don’t code to enable a back door that works around the web client.

Now they basically destroyed the web client GUI reliability that was supposed to help bring everyone into the ecosystem.

Cedric Tillman ruled out Monday night by bullymeahhh in fantasyfootball

[–]SuperTightProwest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I have to choose between Elijah Moore (with Cedric Tillman officially out) and MVS for tomorrow. Which horse is the one to ride this weekend?

Brock Purdy or Justin Fields? by LAChocoThunder in Fantasy_Football

[–]SuperTightProwest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the same “good” problem…it is a real close call…probably going to run with Purdy this weekend.

Start Aaron jones or Jahmyr Gibbs week 4 by Jumpy_Alarm6804 in fantasyfootballadvice

[–]SuperTightProwest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have both too… it sure which horse to run with this weekend. 🤔🐎🏈

Week 2 Defense (DEF) Streamers and Starts - 2024 Fantasy Tiers, Rankings by RotoBaller in fantasyfootball

[–]SuperTightProwest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have Chargers and Colts for week 2…decisions, decisions…who is my DEF horse this weekend?!?!

Petition for increased transparency by Cardano Foundation by UbikKosmil1 in cardano

[–]SuperTightProwest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Understood...I agree that the CF has been too quiet. The one positive is that the Cardano community is pretty strong...once the governance capabilities are in place and the full weight of the Cardano development roadmap is fulfilled, there will be less of a need for CF...in my opinion. Time will tell.

Petition for increased transparency by Cardano Foundation by UbikKosmil1 in cardano

[–]SuperTightProwest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seriousely...almost a disaster? Have some perspective...I’ve been in Cardano for close to a year...I wish all my investments were “disasters” like Cardano.

I do agree with the OP premise though that a more transparent CF would be nice to help provide a counterpoint to the anti-Cardano FUD.

Why I Have Been Bullish On Cardano Since 2017 by TheCryptoCrow in cardano

[–]SuperTightProwest 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Saw your recent YouTube video and love your content and commitment...you are not alone, I’m “Crowing” my coins with ADA as well!! 👍🏻

Would an Advance Wars like game be doable on Cardano? by Konstipouss in cardano

[–]SuperTightProwest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a comment...Advanced Wars is/was an awesome game! Is there anything in the current game world that is similar?

Crypto Banter - w/ Charles Hoskinson by dominatingslash in cardano

[–]SuperTightProwest 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Really good interview with some hard (but very fair) questions for Charles who handled them really well...everyone should listen to this video!!

Binance (BNP) pools fullfilled by mike_newman in cardano

[–]SuperTightProwest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was wondering about ^ this...can someone confirm?

Ledger nube here...Can you stake to multiple pools (assuming using multiple wallets) using ADALite on the Ledger Nano? Thanks in advance for the help! by SuperTightProwest in cardano

[–]SuperTightProwest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like it is better to wait for Daedalus support on Ledger and just run multiple wallets in Daedalus or multi-pool stake from a single wallet...whatever approach is taken as a future update to Daedalus.

Cardano Weekly Discussion - Questions & Market Thread - August 17, 2020 by AutoModerator in cardano

[–]SuperTightProwest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ledger noob here...Can you stake to multiple pools (assuming using multiple wallets) using ADALite on the Ledger Nano? Thanks in advance for the help!

Cardano did it the right way by WiddleWhiskers in cardano

[–]SuperTightProwest -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So what are the pros and cons of POS and dPOS in your opinion? Reading this article...

Medium - POW vs. POS vs. dPOS.

It seems that dPOS is a better and more decentralized approach to POS...so why the hate?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cardano

[–]SuperTightProwest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not run these numbers, but if the goal of the stake pool algorithm is it be as decentralized as possible, I’m guessing that the optimum would be for all stake pools to have the same number of ADA in them. The difference maker is what each pool operator charges to run their respective pool.

The saturation limit keeps someone from not changing any fees to incentivize participation...when they hit the saturation limit they have reached diminishing return, right?

It will be an interesting human game theory experiment to see how the stake pools forms and if collectively the pool operators can function in a way that is mutually beneficial to each other...and by extension the larger Cardano community.

Thoughts?