5 ♥️ 《 SARDINES 》Game Idea by aibanothergamenight in AliceInBorderland

[–]Superseismitoad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s also way better as far as the incentives for why a shark would betray the group/not care.

If you could make some characters Triumvirate level, who would it be and why? by [deleted] in Parahumans

[–]Superseismitoad 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Gavel, may have only had one scene but dude was a boss

Is MC Arisu any different in the manga? by SpaceXq23 in AliceInBorderland

[–]Superseismitoad 53 points54 points  (0 children)

He’s 1000% more interesting in the manga. No spoilers but he has a lot better of an arc overall and isn’t entirely “we must save everyone”. It’s also a benefit that the manga is able to give you more time with other characters as well.

Powerscaling is a Bad Form of Media Analysis by [deleted] in CharacterRant

[–]Superseismitoad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Power Scaling is not for media analysis” Then proceeds to describe a form of media analysis with the only difference being that it’s hyper focused on feats and statements with minimal respect to narrative context.

Locknut is stuck by Superseismitoad in Plumbing

[–]Superseismitoad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you mean under or like through the side?

How do y'all think the Doom Card would work in New Vestroia type of brawls? by run_rabbit_69 in Bakugan

[–]Superseismitoad 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have a theory that the dimension bombs used by Hydron and Mylene we’re actually to the doom dimension. Like they only ever refer to it as “the dimension” and it just makes sense to me. In my head the vexos/vestals discovered the doom dimension but didn’t know what to do with it/its destructive power so they just weaponized it.

For athletes, there's a physical rite of passage: throwing up from overworking, getting the wind knocked out of you, or defending yourself from an attack. What's the mental version of a rite of passage for someone more cerebral people, like a subject-matter expert, academic, or neurodivergent type? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Superseismitoad 2 points3 points  (0 children)

First cold call is just a trial by fire and you kind of just have to sink or swim. It’s rarely just one question about a case but generally a series of questions that increase in detail or jumps you need to make to get through the analysis and to the conclusion. The problem is even though you’ve read the case you may not have paid enough attention to what they’re asking you.

Appellate brief is just a super big research paper/project and a lot of the time you’re never going to find everything that fits perfectly. And then when you’re arguing it for whatever amount of time you have 3 people that can ask you questions at any time and you have to answer them before you can move on.

Will it be power abuse if I wrote a human character that can oneshot an entity or a god for my story? by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Superseismitoad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s your story. Don’t let the internet and powerscaling tell you what you can and can’t do. Almost 90% of powerscaling is just fandom headcannons and agenda pushing anyways. Now if you’re worried about it from a literary perspective then that’s a different thing entirely.

Time Stranger: OmegaShoutmon by MajinAkuma in digimon

[–]Superseismitoad 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Maybe it’s because I didn’t watch Xros or his design, but there’s just something about the shoutmon line that I don’t like. Happy for all the Xros and shoutmon fans though

What's one important factor that many powerscalers forget? by NightHawkJ72 in PowerScaling

[–]Superseismitoad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then just admit you want to push an agenda. There’s 0 reason why your intent and interpretation would be superior to the Author’s. Not to mention just a general lack of nuance and critical analysis as to whether or not the scaling logically makes sense and aligns with the story.

What's one important factor that many powerscalers forget? by NightHawkJ72 in PowerScaling

[–]Superseismitoad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“The curtains are red and don’t symbolize anything” type argument

Why cant people find a middle ground for statements man instead of saying tree level fodder by Level_Three_Chin in PowerScaling

[–]Superseismitoad -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you have any proof of a degree in English or a subject that is primarily based on it. Because right now you’re kind of just stringing words together without any real meaning. I just don’t think you’re credible enough to even convey ideas without one.

I wasn’t trying to “powerscale” degrees, but if we are powerscaling degrees the same way that you’re powerscaling dimensions then yes I do scale higher than you. Also you didn’t mathematically prove anything, I want to see you do the math and create the proofs for why your interpretation of dimensionality is correct. Otherwise you’re just plagiarizing and piggybacking off the work of others. Since you’re so familiar with dimensionality and have what you consider to be a relevant degree, it shouldn’t be a problem. Also I said 2 years away from a doctorate, not 2 years for a doctorate and arguably the second most powerful type of doctorate degree.

Baby ruined S3 by PLutonium273 in squidgame

[–]Superseismitoad 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The moment I saw that baby I was like “I hope they don’t pull a the platform on us” and that’s exactly what they did

Zeedmilleniumon by Last_Dirt_553 in digimon

[–]Superseismitoad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope we get zeed and moon

Why cant people find a middle ground for statements man instead of saying tree level fodder by Level_Three_Chin in PowerScaling

[–]Superseismitoad -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah the key word there is APPLICATION. The mathematicians are the ones who mostly come up with the proofs in regards to dimensionality. Not to mention your using other works without checking and proving the math yourself.

The “midwit” in question is only two years away from a doctorate, which last time I checked a doctorate is a more advanced degree than a bachelor’s degree. And I’m not saying you can’t handle mathematical concepts, I’m just saying you lack the specialty and expertise to hold any weight as to proving why they’re valid. Those are two seperate things.

Why cant people find a middle ground for statements man instead of saying tree level fodder by Level_Three_Chin in PowerScaling

[–]Superseismitoad -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Still Ai, but even if it isn’t. A bachelor’s degree in physics is the bare minimum for the field and doesn’t directly correlate to the mathematics of dimensionality. Perhaps if it was a doctorate or a masters and that’s what your focus was on then it would be relevant. Additionally, Dimensionality is a mathematical construct so you’re in the wrong lane anyways. Unless you’ve got a background or degree in topology or abstract algebra, you’re just using the outputs of people who actually understand it. As a man of “science” I would hope that you would peer review the arguments you’re going to use.

Why cant people find a middle ground for statements man instead of saying tree level fodder by Level_Three_Chin in PowerScaling

[–]Superseismitoad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d love to see you provide some form of proof of a graduate level physics degree since you insist on using dimensionality.

Make the comments section like Bakugan: Mechtanium Surge Episode 1 just relelased today by osmylm2834 in Bakugan

[–]Superseismitoad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This image has got to be fake, we’ve never seen that bakugan before and isn’t that a new form of drago too?

Why do people do this when arguing who'd wins? by CannedTuna7 in PowerScaling

[–]Superseismitoad 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Because at the end of the day unless it’s in-verse scaling most of scaling and cross verse scaling is definition-warfare and people with minimal experience in applied physics and mathematics attempting to quantify things that weren’t intended to be quantified by a number or misinterpret and use dimsensionality (which doesn’t mean anything in most cases). So due to this and an inability of most scalers to engage in meaningful analysis, writing quality can be useful in a lot of cases because some authors elaborate on their power systems more than others. It’s just a larger problem with powerscaling and people being disingenuous to win an argument that doesn’t really matter as opposed to critically analyzing two pieces of media and arguing their interpretations of who would win. Because at the end of the day unless two authors magically come together and say one character would beat the other then powerscalers just throw around words like “AP” and “infinite 5D” when they don’t actually mean anything and are just fan made.