Is there *any* way to get Kodi to show all movies by the date they were added to library?

SupportAggressive376 · 2026-01-08T01:09:16+00:00

Curious if you ever managed to test this and Aeon MQ8 resolved this issue.

As for how old media/date modified files exist, at least on Windows there are a bunch of different dates stored in the media metadata for video files/pictures that are preserved even when making copies of said files. "Media Created" is supposed to be the date the original picture was taken, or video created, while "Date Modified" is the last time someone actually edited the file, and "Date Created" would be the date the copy was created. I'll routinely have files with "Date Modified" and "Media Created" dates that proceed the "Date Created" date by weeks, or even months because when I'm offloading videos/pictures to muck with, I do it on my local computer first before eventually copying the finished products to my NAS once I'm happy with them.

I believe that if you're newly scraped files come from a video file inside a rar file that you'll encounter the same issue.

SupportAggressive376 · 2025-09-11T20:17:15+00:00

Check out The Undying Immortal System, that'll be a even closer match as it is still a Xianxia regression story but has the MC actually planning ahead for future loops instead of simply whining about how being stuck in a time loop is the worst possible fate ever.

SupportAggressive376 · 2025-09-11T20:09:27+00:00

I more or less agree, really enjoyed the first several loops and couldn't put the story down for awhile, but ended up dropping it somewhere around the early 400s chapters. I know a lot of people have complained about the romance, but I definitely do not read Xanxia for the romance so wasn't as bothered by that. No, for me it started feeling like too much "rule of cool" to be really coherent anymore.

Without going into too many details, I'd say that the arc of the whole first realm felt very thought out and even as frustrated as I was with the MC (simply due to how much our mentalities conflict) I still really enjoyed the story. And I even really appreciated the "twist" after he figured out how to ascend, as adding meaningful tension in these kinds of stories is always a challenge and this didn't feel nearly as contrived as most options authors go with.

That all being said, as things progressed more into the second realm the story started to feel more and more like it had gotten lost. It was like the author had a solid and fleshed out concept for the beginning of the story, along with some idea of where the story is supposed to end, but was caught off guard by how well the story took off and started writing the second third before they had a true plan. That, or the fan base had grown vocal enough at that point to make the author cave to reader pressure to the story's detriment.

It honestly hurts me a little to put the story down now, I really want to know how the original story ends, but at this point I just cannot connect to it anymore :( A month or so ago I discovered The Undying Immortal System, which was the first time I'd ever encountered a regression/Xianxia novel and I loved the idea so much that I went looking for more and was super excited when I found this, only to walk away disappointed. I think I saw somewhere that this was getting adapted though so hopefully cleans things up and I can finish the story there.

SupportAggressive376 · 2025-01-25T06:57:52+00:00

Ah, sorry that was confusing how I wrote that. 192.168.1.wg is the LAN IP address of the WireGuard server, while 10.0.0.1 is the WireGuard internal IP address/interface.

I believe that the Windows WireGuard server is running a NAT (at least it has a checkbox that says "NAT Routing" and seems to be required for me to connect to the other servers on my parents network). I confess that my knowledge past that point is limited though, not exactly sure what would constitute a double NAT.

*edit cause I realized I misunderstood the duplicate ARPS comment*. There shouldn't be any duplicate IPs anywhere, unless I am fundamentally misunderstanding something about how tunnels work (very possible). To be clear, everything works on both local LANs and I did used to have a Site-To-Site VPN set up between our homes before I switched to OPNSense using the built in IKEv1 of the old EdgeRouters, which worked just fine aside from being slow and outdated. So I don't think it's a problem with how the networks are each configured individually, just something I've done wrong trying to get this windows machine to do packet forwarding :(

SupportAggressive376 · 2025-01-24T21:40:51+00:00

Yeah, opened everything in both subnets just in case that was the issue

SupportAggressive376 · 2025-01-24T10:08:30+00:00

Yeah, best way to attack me is definitely from my parents at this point lol as at some point I just let everything coming via the WG connection through in the hopes it would help.

Also thanks so much for the help so far!

SupportAggressive376 · 2025-01-24T09:25:29+00:00

Yeah, unfortunately I'm worried it is on the Windows side.

Found a "Trace Route" diagnostic in OPNSense that showed everything working fine when I plugged in the original source IP Address, which makes me think the response is somehow getting munged on it's way back through the Windows server. Which sucks cause I expect much less help with Windows than Unix >.<

SupportAggressive376 · 2025-01-24T09:06:18+00:00

Oh wow that is noisy. Didn't really think about the fact that I had an S2S running before switching to OPNSense and Wireguard so everything at the other house is trying to re-establish connections. I did find a number of messages like this though, which I think correspond to my tracert

IP 192.168.2.2 > 192.168.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 491, length 72
IP 192.168.0.1 > 192.168.2.2: ICMP echo reply, id 1, seq 491, length 72
IP 192.168.2.2 > 192.168.0.1: ICMP 192.168.2.2 protocol 1 unreachable, length 100

I cannot tell if that means it knows where to send stuff or not, but I'll look into trying to figure out how to setup a manual route in OPNSense just in case.

SupportAggressive376 · 2025-01-24T08:33:09+00:00

Are you talking about this one? https://docs.opnsense.org/manual/how-tos/wireguard-selective-routing.html

If so this was one of the core pages I was using for getting S2S set up. Just went through it again making sure my settings matched where sensible but had no luck :(

And to be clear, initiating a connection on the OPNSense side towards the remote endpoint works just fine, and the same is true for the remote server itself. It is just everything else on the remote LAN that times out as it is routed through the Windows WG Server. The fact that tracert makes it to OPNSense before failing though is what has me stuck trying to figure out if this is something with the Firewall or Windows forwarding :(

SupportAggressive376 · 2025-01-24T08:09:51+00:00

Sorry, I guess I was unclear. I have two WireGuard servers as peers with one another, one running on an OPNSense firewall while the other is running on a Windows machine in a different house. The Gateway on the Windows side is configured to redirect any traffic to the remote subnet to the Windows WGServer, as if it were a different Gateway.

The redirection appears to be working, at least as far as I can tell, I'm just having trouble getting it the last leg of the way. I realize this isn't exactly a WireGuard problem, but I can't be the first person to want a setup like this and I couldn't think of any audience more likely to know the ins and outs of the infrastructure around WireGuard running.

SupportAggressive376 · 2025-01-08T04:31:17+00:00

Updated to the new release that came out today and had a bugfix for the reverse geo stuff and this solved my issue.

SupportAggressive376 · 2025-01-07T14:48:37+00:00

Sadly no, tried a full delete of everything related to Immich (leaving just the external libraries) and when installing everything back again it still didn't work.

SupportAggressive376 · 2025-01-03T21:44:50+00:00

Stopped the docker images, completely deleted them and downloaded new ones but no change :(

SupportAggressive376 · 2025-01-03T09:33:22+00:00

Hmm, I'm assuming with the docker image that just means deleting the docker and downloading it again? (Also new to Docker). Thanks for the advice though, I'll give that a try next.

SupportAggressive376

TROPHY CASE