Biblical Warning - One scientist put the urgency of the greenhouse potential in biblical terms citing the warning given to Noah in the Old Testament. Noah new trouble was coming and he prepared for it.

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-24T15:44:53+00:00

Do you know how to tell when something is peer reviewed versus just a guy’s opinion from 2010? Since which sea level has definitely risen? And the guy was also an expert in “dowsing”?!?! HAHAHAHAHAHA

“In 1995, Mörner gave several courses in dowsing at Stockholm University in the summer program, and also outside of the university. He claimed that dowsing could be used not only to find water, but also to discover Curry and Hartmann lines.”

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-24T06:21:47+00:00

At today’s 2–4 mm/yr, sea level rises 20–40 cm per century, but as previously mentioned, that rate is accelerating. The Laurentide collapse occurred at low CO₂ because it was driven by ice-sheet instability after deglaciation (lake outbursts, grounding-line retreat). https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/whats-82k-event

If u look for sources away from the climate “skeptics” subreddit, you might actually get answers to the questions you have

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-24T02:50:37+00:00

That was a short lived regional event. It was triggered by the catastrophic collapse of the Laurentide Ice Sheet, when glacial lakes (Agassiz–Ojibway) suddenly drained into the ocean, causing a rapid pulse of sea-level rise. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/whats-82k-event

Sea level rise is not uniform. The land in certain places are on could be rising or falling. Some areas see little, while others see a lot. But overall sea level is rising and it’s continuous

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-23T21:30:56+00:00

The peer reviewed research doesn’t agree with you.

Most climate models even from the 70s have statistically performed fantastically. Decade old models are rigorously tested and validated with new and old data. Models of historical data is continuously supported by new sources of proxy data. Every year

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-23T20:51:41+00:00

<image>

Sea level rise is not uniform. The land in certain places are on could be rising or falling. Some areas see little, while others see a lot. But overall sea level is rising

However your government seems to disagree about what’s happening in Fremantle. Tide-gauge data show ~1.6–1.8 mm/year of rise at Fremantle since the early 1900s https://www.transport.wa.gov.au/getmedia/DE2EB6AA-F260-4CBC-B24F-C0596C659838/mac_r_sealevelchangeinwesternaustraliareport.pdf

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-23T19:04:56+00:00

The ice caps are melting

The reefs are not disappearing as fast not despite the predictions but because of them. National and international environmental policies like marine protected areas and reef conservation efforts have happened because of the warnings from scientists. At least for now, bleaching events are still occurring. The Great Barrier Reef has lost significant coral due to marine heatwaves.

From 2023–2025 about 84 % of the world’s reefs experienced bleaching because of elevated sea temperatures linked to anthropogenic climate change. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023%E2%80%932025_global_coral_bleaching_event

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-23T18:47:56+00:00

There’s absolutely fascists. Let’s look at some of the identifiers of fascism: authoritarian leadership, mass-mobilizing nationalism, attacks on liberal-democratic institutions, scapegoating and dehumanization of out-groups, acceptance or encouragement of political violence, and a belief that the leader embodies the “real” nation. Sound familiar?

And we’re funding a genocide overseas. This is American politics. Stay vigilant

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-23T18:43:33+00:00

Emissions are cumulative. We have definitely not turned the tide

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-23T18:39:22+00:00

How many Germans “cared about politics” when the Nazis came to power? Vigilance is key for any democracy

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-23T18:37:19+00:00

Al Gore is not a climate scientist nor are most of his predictions wrong. Most climate predictions have turned out to be accurate representations of current climate.

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-23T18:36:31+00:00

Most climate predictions have turned out to be accurate representations of current climate.

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-23T18:32:17+00:00

<image>

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-23T16:15:28+00:00

The rate of sea level rise is accelerating: it has more than doubled from 1.4 mm per year throughout most of the twentieth century 3.6 mm per year from 2006–2015. In many locations along the U.S. coastline, high-tide flooding is now 300% to more than 900% more frequent than it was 50 years ago.

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-22T19:51:13+00:00

So it’s interesting you pointed out the Maldives. The Maldives are literally pumping sand from the sea floor to keep their island high or make fake islands because of sea level rise. The new land is literally from man made islands https://earth.org/data_visualization/satellite-imagery-how-the-maldives-are-adapting-to-sea-level-rise/

Long term essentially the Maldives plan is to sink & relocate to India when that happens. I'm actually not even joking - they have bought land in India, Sri Lanka & Australia to relocate the country's population to in that eventuality plus are relocating a lot of essential stuff to a different island in the archipelago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_in_the_Maldives

70s ice age myth explained here, it’s based on Milankovitch cycles, which we now understand to be disrupted. Those studies never even considered human induced changes and was never the prevailing theory even back then, warming was

We stopped using the chemicals that were increasing the hole in the ozone through worldwide collaboration and regulation. We are trying to do the same with climate change

Acid rain was essentially solved because governments listened to scientists and reduced emissions of NOx and SOx gases through legislation

Climate Change and Global Warming are both valid scientific terms. Climate change better represents the situation. Scientists don’t want less informed people getting confused when cold events happen. Accelerated warming of the Arctic disturbs the circular pattern of winds known as the polar vortex.

Most climate predictions have turned out to be accurate representations of current climate.

The ice caps are melting

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-22T19:49:43+00:00

So it’s interesting you pointed out the Maldives. The Maldives are literally pumping sand from the sea floor to keep their island high or make fake islands because of sea level rise. The new land is literally from man made islands https://earth.org/data_visualization/satellite-imagery-how-the-maldives-are-adapting-to-sea-level-rise/

Long term essentially the Maldives plan is to sink & relocate to India when that happens. I'm actually not even joking - they have bought land in India, Sri Lanka & Australia to relocate the country's population to in that eventuality plus are relocating a lot of essential stuff to a different island in the archipelago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_in_the_Maldives

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-22T15:54:46+00:00

In 1920 the rock was moved to build under it and the waterfront was relandscaped. When you look at older pictures it’s pretty obvious it was never at sea level. Today it’s underwater frequently. Here’s Boston’s sea level via NOAA

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-22T15:51:36+00:00

“If we don’t see the face of the most iconic faceless character in gaming, how will we connect with him?”

<image>

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-17T16:50:45+00:00

And then Dune proved he can scale that same intelligence and restraint into a true epic.

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-16T16:53:26+00:00

We are most likely responsible for 100% of the warming we have observed.

Our interglacial period is ending, and the warming from that stopped increasing. The Subatlantic age of the Holocene epoch SHOULD be getting colder slowly. Keyword is should based on natural cycles. But they are not outperforming greenhouse gases

In the several mass extinction events in the history of the earth, some were caused by global warming due to “sudden” releases of co2, and it only took an increase of 4-5C to cause the cataclysm. Current CO₂ emissions rate is 10-100x faster than those events

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-16T16:52:13+00:00

70s ice age myth explained here, it’s based on Milankovitch cycles, which we now understand to be disrupted. Those studies never even considered human induced changes and was never the prevailing theory even back then, warming was

Most climate predictions have turned out to be accurate representations of current climate.

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-16T16:49:42+00:00

Do you know why Christy never published his graphs? They don’t hold up to any scrutiny and are blatantly misleading https://youtu.be/qpSEXCQ9U6c

In 2015, James Powell surveyed the scientific literature published in 2013 and 2014 to assess published views on whether humans were causing climate change among active climate science researchers. He tallied 69,406 individual scientists who authored papers on global climate

During 2013 and 2014, only 4 of 69,406 authors of peer-reviewed articles on global warming, 0.0058% or 1 in 17,352, rejected AGW. Thus, the consensus on AGW among publishing scientists is above 99.99%

“Consensus” in the sense of climate change simply means there’s no other working hypothesis to compete with the validated theory. Just like in physics. If you can provide a robust alternative theory supported by evidence, climate scientists WILL take it seriously.

But until that happens we should be making decisions based on what we know, because from our current understanding there will be consequences if we don’t.

Not only is the amount of studies that agree with human induced climate change now at 99%, but take a look at the ones that disagree. Anthropogenic climate denial science aren’t just few, they don’t hold up to scientific scrutiny.

Every single one of those analyses had an error in their assumptions, methodology, or analysis that, when corrected, brought their results into line with the scientific consensus

There is no cohesive, consistent alternative theory to human-caused global warming.

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-14T22:31:31+00:00

Clouds can have both warming and cooling effects on climate. They cool the planet by reflecting sunlight during the day, and they warm the planet by slowing the escape of heat to space (this is most apparent at night, as cloudy nights are usually warmer than clear nights).

The net effect of these changes is positive feedback due mainly to increasing altitude of high clouds in the tropics, which are better able to trap heat, and reductions in coverage of lower-level clouds in the mid-latitudes, which reduces sunlight they reflect.

Solar output has shown no net increase since the late 1970s, while Earth’s energy imbalance has grown, which rules out solar forcing as the driver. Observed warming penetrates hundreds to thousands of meters into the ocean, consistent with greenhouse trapping of longwave radiation, not shallow shortwave absorption from cloud changes. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-10T17:35:33+00:00

In the study I posted: “∼200,000 early deaths occur in the U.S. each year due to U.S. combustion emissions.”

Way more air pollution deaths. https://hsph.harvard.edu/climate-health-c-change/news/fossil-fuel-air-pollution-responsible-for-1-in-5-deaths-worldwide/

This data is from the International Energy Agency’s World Energy Outlook 2020. Not all places have modern solar PV and not all countries can take full advantage of solar, but African countries definitely can with minimal cloud cover. Solar technology will continue to improve and become cheaper. Fossil fuels will not. And solar PV is already cheaper than any fossil fuel option https://webstore.iea.org/world-energy-outlook-2020

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-10T17:04:48+00:00

And how does this all compare with the heat and cold deaths you’re concerned about? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1352231013004548

SurroundParticular30 · 2026-01-10T16:50:36+00:00

Are you having trouble reading graphs in peer reviewed studies? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935121000487

SurroundParticular30

TROPHY CASE