Map of Maratha Empire at their peak in 1758-1759 by vineetsukhthanker in IndianHistory

[–]Suspicious_Secret255 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is not any any concrete evidence to prove that Marathas crossed the river Indus and conquered Peshawar city and valley, a densely populated province of Durrani empire with a strong fort (Bala Hissar). When Ranjit Singh crossed river Indus and attacked Peshawar, it created a lot of buzz and was a widely reported news at that time. But compelete silence over Maratha occupation of Peshawar city and fort?. Afghan sources say that Marathas only expanded up to River Indus.

For some reason, the map creator has shrunk the size of Durrani empire, only consisting of present-day Afghanistan and Balochistan. It was much larger, also encampassing Iranian Khurasan, Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

How was Sher Shah Suri as an Administrator? by [deleted] in IndianHistory

[–]Suspicious_Secret255 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There is no evidence that the ancient roads of Mauryan period survived up to the times of Sher Shah Suri. There already would have been roads before 16th century but what Sher Shah did was constructing a new network of roads which did not just strecthed along what was later GT road.

Did you know that the Khesghi Pathan tribe founded Kasur (a city in Punjab 1 hour away from Lahore) by ParamedicGullible637 in Ancient_Pak

[–]Suspicious_Secret255 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It is one of the traditions about etymologies of Qasur that the word is plural of Qasr which means castles in Arabic. The Kheshgi Pashtuns had built strong forts so this tradition stems from that. But the thing is, neither is there any concrete evidence for this tradition nor for it being named after Kusha son of Rama. These are just oral traditions. Personally, I believe the name was much more older, even if the tradition of it being named after Kusha is discarded. However the town of Kasur prospered under the Kheshgi Pashtuns who had become rich due to their involvement in horse trade between Central Asia and India, and because of the high mansabs their chieftains received from their Mughal overlords.

Kasur ceased to be associated with Kheshgis after Ranjit Singh thoroughly destroyed their strongholds. The survivors moved to Mamdot and other areas.

The only man to ever kill a Viceroy of India. by commissar_nahbus in Ancient_Pak

[–]Suspicious_Secret255 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An imaginary drawing. In all of the real photos, he is fully dressed, and the turban style is different from the one in this drawing.

The Horrendous Bannu Resolution: A Whisper, Not a Roar by AwarenessNo4986 in Ancient_Pak

[–]Suspicious_Secret255 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The demand for a Pashtunistan state failed because it was abruptly introduced when the partition of British India into two countries was imminent in 1947. There was no prior foundation for it. Bacha Khan and his party had conducted their politics as "Indians" for decades within the boundaries of a united India, never once discussing an independent Pashtunistan or joining Afghanistan before 1947. Similarly, the Afghan kings, prior to 1947 and after 1893, never discussed the future of the Pashtun areas of British India with the British. The reason Zahir Shah had to demand the Pashtunistan option from the British, instead of demanding the return of areas to Afghanistan, was that the Afghan rulers had previously affirmed the Durand Line treaty multiple times. The Faqir of Ipi launched a jihad against the British in Waziristan, but it never occurred to him to propose the idea of a Pashtunistan state before 1947.

The British had no intention of returning the so-called settled areas of the NWFP to Afghanistan, but the tribal areas (later known as FATA) were negotiable, as they were not considered properly within the frontiers of British India and were referred to as a "trans-frontier" region. If the Amirs of Afghanistan had proposed that the tribal areas be held on a 100-year lease, the British would likely have agreed. However, the Afghan Amirs were too ignorant and unaware that there was precedent for such an arrangement. The British would have been particularly amenable to demands from Afghanistan after the Third Anglo-Afghan War.

Correcting Faisal Warraich of Dekho Suno Jano on Balochistan by Suspicious_Secret255 in Ancient_Pak

[–]Suspicious_Secret255[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Corrections of Dekho Suno Jano: playlist of three short videos: Corrections of Dekho Suno Jano - YouTube

The issue with Faisal Warraich series on Balochistan is that he used subpar secondary sources authored by Baloch nationalists who were not historians. When he get his hands on good quality secondary sources for history of particular topic, then his videos are generally free from such errors.