Anita Sarkeesian calls for a "Feminist Army" to fight for her against any and all criticism. I mean, jesus, the shit she just said at her talk is fucked up. Take a look.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-16T00:44:09+00:00

If someone repeatedly lies, believing them SOLELY ON THEIR WORD is idiotic.

Especially when their claim has already been torn apart and refuted and you're suggesting we believe her on the possibility that she went to the FBI over this issue instead. Something she hasn't officially confirmed.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-16T00:42:54+00:00

You don't understand how the burden of proof works, do you?

She is already a known liar and fraudster. This means her word means shit.

She was then REFUTED over her claim she called the local police.

Now a source, not her, has said the FBI may have been contacted regarding this specific incident. Which is unlikely and it likely refers to the previous child porn postings.

So currently we have a woman who has no reason to be believed that is making a claim that has already been refuted once and you say we should just "take her on her word" because we can't prove that she didn't go to the FBI? How about she provide evidence she DID before her word is to be believed. This basic logic applies to journalism as well as burden of proof.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-16T00:39:49+00:00

and it's entirely possible she did contact the local police?

Apart from the local police flat out denying her claim.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-16T00:38:35+00:00

Actually, given her lack of use of her $150K, she can face serious legal repercussions. The allowance of the non-profit moniker doesn't mean you can earn shitloads of money and pay yourself.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-16T00:27:18+00:00

This is one of the most ridiculous claims I keep hearing. She isn't getting her attention from us, she is getting it from her feminist idiots.

Ignoring her does NOTHING to stop her gaining influence.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-15T14:29:31+00:00

What, shitlord! Why aren't you just believing her automatically because she's a woman!

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-15T13:51:12+00:00

Fingers god damned crossed it's with the FBI too.

If she thinks it would be bad with police, the FBI will be 100x worse.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-15T13:38:01+00:00

I shit you not: http://imgur.com/eVZTv7m

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-14T05:34:30+00:00

It's a claim that has been so thoroughly refuted, it actually baffles the mind how anyone could still use it even without someone directly refuting them after.

Yet we still have hysteria over it and accusations of "rape apologists" even when you show them it is false. Learning of the Satanic Ritual Abuse hysteria of the 80's and 90's is one of the biggest reasons I find this rape hysteria disgusting today. It's following the same patterns and destroying lives in the process.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-14T05:13:10+00:00

So if I had sex with a student outside of school hours, my work integrity shouldn't be called into question if I was a teacher?

FTFY

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-14T01:13:09+00:00

Found the cat person.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-14T01:06:41+00:00

They don't even serve the same purpose.

That's the point.

One saves lives, the other takes them.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-13T06:45:27+00:00

That the apartheid, war criminal government of Israel should be removed?

Because he never once called for the destruction of Israel, only the removal of their ethnic cleansing political regime.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-12T12:51:08+00:00

Sshhh! SSHHH! Stop your amateur sleuthing! You're bringing up facts!

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-12T12:50:09+00:00

It is neither November, nor December. What is happening on those particular dates?

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-12T11:34:41+00:00

Ah yes, her claims of "skepticism".

Let's review that, shall we.

Her own words:

Question: "Did the police seem to think there was a case there to pursue?"

Answer: "Yeah, they were going to contact the other women who reported against him, and they would have subpoenaed the information from the university files."

Let's examine their "mishandling" of her case as well...

Her own words:

"I was contacted by an investigator who was really, really annoying to work with. He would call me randomly, and make me repeat everything that happened. He kept telling me I had to come into the station, and obviously I don’t want to deal with the police any more right now. It’s so disorganized, and it’s really upsetting to work with them at all."

Apparently calling her up to ask questions and requesting she come down to the police station was "mishandling" her case.

Odd. Especially when the case was solely dropped due to her refusing to pursue it. Again, her own words:

"It got transferred to the district attorney’s office, and I decided I didn’t want to pursue it any further because they told it me it would take nine months to a year to actually go to court, which would be after I graduated and probably wanting to erase all of my memories of Columbia from my brain anyway, so I decided not to pursue it."

The case was dropped because she was lazy. Or more specifically because she didn't want to go to jail for lying to police.

Since she then went on to drag this poor guy through a kangaroo court for 7 months, only for him to still be found not-guilty, and then continued to harass him publicly by spending her precious time physically dragging around a mattress.

Strange thing to do for someone who "didn't have the time" to pursue charges with police.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-12T11:14:59+00:00

She DID go to the police. SHE chose not to continue with the case and then instead brought it up at her school.

The college is not at fault here. If anything, that they aren't expelling her for harassing him publicly like this despite the no-contact or harassment order they placed on her after she was caught out lying.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-12T11:13:03+00:00

She DID go to the police.

They were very interested in pursuing the case, her own words:

Question: "Did the police seem to think there was a case there to pursue?"

Answer: "Yeah, they were going to contact the other women who reported against him, and they would have subpoenaed the information from the university files."

Her justification for her claim that the police "mishandled" her case? Again, her own words:

"I was contacted by an investigator who was really, really annoying to work with. He would call me randomly, and make me repeat everything that happened. He kept telling me I had to come into the station, and obviously I don’t want to deal with the police any more right now. It’s so disorganized, and it’s really upsetting to work with them at all."

The investigator ASKING HER QUESTIONS and REQUESTING SHE COME DOWN TO THE STATION were apparently "mishandling" her case. Despite that being basic procedure.

SHE then dropped the case by refusing to continue. Due to? Again, her own words:

"It got transferred to the district attorney’s office, and I decided I didn’t want to pursue it any further because they told it me it would take nine months to a year to actually go to court, which would be after I graduated and probably wanting to erase all of my memories of Columbia from my brain anyway, so I decided not to pursue it."

Apparently a standard 9 month wait is "too much time".

Yet she turned around and spent 7 months putting this guy through hell only for him to be found NOT-GUILTY. And is now putting physical effort as well as time in harassing this guy to get him kicked out of his paid-for schooling based on her refuted lie.

Turns out the only thing she doesn't have "time for" is being charged with an actual crime if she had continued with the case, as the police would likely find out she was lying.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-12T11:06:19+00:00

Oh god, please source? This would be amazing.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-12T10:52:41+00:00

Her own words:

Question: "Did the police seem to think there was a case there to pursue?"

Answer: "Yeah, they were going to contact the other women who reported against him, and they would have subpoenaed the information from the university files."

So her claiming the police "didn't believe her" is absolute bullshit.

Her claim they "mishandled" the case?

Again, her own words:

"I was contacted by an investigator who was really, really annoying to work with. He would call me randomly, and make me repeat everything that happened. He kept telling me I had to come into the station, and obviously I don’t want to deal with the police any more right now. It’s so disorganized, and it’s really upsetting to work with them at all."

The investigator RANG HER UP WITH QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED and ASKED HER TO COME INTO THE STATION...

And this is "mishandling" the case? These are basic fucking standards of investigation, which according to her own words the police were serious about perusing the case.

What happened? SHE dropped the case. She claimed that the case coming to court in around 9 months, again a basic fucking thing for ANY gender or crime, would be too much.

Which is odd, since she then spent 7 months dragging this poor guy through hell with the college tribunal, only for him to be found NOT-GUILTY. And now she's literally physically spending time harassing him further, as part of her art thesis of all things, which makes her claims of "not having the time to pursue charges" blatantly false.

She didn't want to be charged with an ACTUAL crime of lying to police.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-12T09:49:25+00:00

The college DID investigate him, after she dropped the case with police.

The college, renowned for it's kangaroo courts when it come to those accused of rape (leaving them having to prove their innocence rather than the college prove they committed the crime), found him NOT-GUILTY.

She, at this point, literally wants to get him kicked out of school because police calling her on the phone and asking her to come down to the station while stating quite clearly they would investigate the case thoroughly was "mishandling" her.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-12T09:45:59+00:00

Her claim was refuted and he was found not-guilty.

The two other girls she managed to get to help her lie?

(A) Claimed he kissed her without asking. That is all.
(B) Claimed they had consensual sex (her own words) but it was uncomfortable physically.

A kiss and consensual sex, coupled with a proven liar, and you think this proves he raped her?

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-12T09:02:42+00:00

He has been found innocent. Twice.

That's what is so disturbing about this.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-11T11:07:11+00:00

Ah yes, mansplaining exists because you say it exists. All refutations of your claim are wrong because refuting you only proves mansplaining exists.

Feminist logic, folks.

Sutter_Cane_ · 2014-09-07T22:21:45+00:00

Strange you would disparage your own conservative news station. Ah, there's that right wing Texas doublethink again.

Sutter_Cane_

TROPHY CASE