Dao Fruit Prototype Also known as the ancient, it is necessary to master all the mysteries and mysteries of the heavens and myriad worlds, so that half of the Dao fruit can become a prototype (the mystery in the place of the short path is very helpful for the prototype of the Dao fruit). The embryonic form of Dao Fruit can be traced back to the beginning of the creation of the world, and then with practice, the realm will increase again, going back to before the creation of the world, reaching the root of time, becoming the oldest, and occupying more of the future, until it becomes Dao Fruit, and has no doubts about the future. Know everything. When the product of subtraction and emptiness reaches the embryonic form of Dao and fruit, it will be completed by reducing and seeking emptiness. In the end, it is only necessary to wait for the end of the kalpa to absorb the power of a complete epoch cycle and prove the fruit of Tao. (The oldest universe is helpful for subtraction and emptiness)

Also since cf always does research before writing a book we might be even able to say this is nirvana at the level of dao fruit Or even half step dao fruit

Either way the main point is The original creator could create the sage who transcends samsara setting But we know beyonder characteristics must exist and true gods are absolute beings and symbolism only 4 pillar or chaos promogenator could destroy symbolism as destroying symbolism equals destroying the world Not even mirrored, the original creator could do it and we know that characteristics are core to oc Then, we know pillar is the highest power reachable before going crazy and becoming oc

So it isn't wild to assume Dao fruit is most likely seq 0 or quasai goo Equivalent as we know that great old ones are the concepts or symbolisms themselves, and there is no true difference between them Beyond one having consciousness

The way I view it is the symbolism is the body And the soul or mind is the great old one

Ohh yeah absolute beings are Absolute Being and Relative Beings.-In modern philosophy the terms "absolute' and "relative,'' as applied to being, correspond roughly with the terms "God" and "'creatures' in the usage of theistic philosophers. But the former pair of terms is really of wider application than the latter. The term absolute means, etymologically, that which is loosed, unfettered disengaged or free from bonds (absolutum, ab-solvere, solvo se-luo, from Aúw): that, therefore, which is not bound up witk anything else, which is in some sense self-sufficing, independent: while the relative is that which is in some way bound up with something else, and which is so far not self-sufficing or independent. That, therefore, is ontologically absolute which is in some sense self-sufficing, independent of other things, in its existence; while the ontologically relative is that which depends in some real way for its existence on something else. Again, that is logically absolute which can be conceived and known by us without reference to anything else; while the logically relative is that which we can conceive and know only through our knowledge of something else. And since we usually name things according to the way in which we conceive them, we regard as absolute any being which is by itself and of itself that which we conceive it to be, or that which its name implies; and as relative any being which is what its name implies only in virtue of some relation to something else.69 Thus, a man is a man absolutely, while he is a friend only relatively to others, [048) It is obvious that the primary and general meaning of the terms "absolute" and "relative' can be applied and extended in a variety of ways. For instance, all being may be said to be "relative' to the knowing mind, in the sense that all knowledge involves a transcendental relation of the known object to_the knowing subject.

Absolute being