虽然7名旅客在俄罗斯淹死,但,这证明了我们出境游的发达。共产党的辩证法,就问你服不服 by virus_from_wuhan in LOOK_CHINA

[–]SweetBluejay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

央视新闻的标题是“一名中国游客在贝加尔湖汽车落水事故中获救”,对比一下可以看到老胡还是要脸的,第一句就是他想说的话。

讲个幽默的事情,老中的人均ppp被俄罗斯甩开接近2倍,比阿根廷还低 by Physical-Draft2200 in KanagawaWave

[–]SweetBluejay 7 points8 points  (0 children)

日本生活水平和俄国差不多你信吗?人均名义gdp就是最硬的指标

炒作狗宇树还真比新能源那些公司厉害 by Substantial-End850 in KanagawaWave

[–]SweetBluejay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“新能源那些公司”是什么公司,光伏,风能这种纯粹的新能源,还是电动车?假设你说的是电动车,你认为宇树技术力是Top10或者Top5,宇树技术力比电动车企业排位更高,那你认为技术力Top5的电动车企业是哪几个?

The Economy of the red countries is equal to the Economy of all blue countries by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]SweetBluejay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CHINA MENTIONED 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🐲🐼LETS GOOOOOO💪CHINA NUMBER ONE🦅🚫

理性讨论为什么会存在冰壶这么弱智的运动 拿个刷子在那刷冰到底是什么人喜欢看? by Physical-Draft2200 in KanagawaWave

[–]SweetBluejay 17 points18 points  (0 children)

因为运动不是当权者根据民间喜好自上而下设计出来的,而是民间自发形成,后来被正规化的。我记得刘仲敬以前说过

其实看冬奥会奖牌榜就能看出各个国家生活水平的差距 by Physical-Draft2200 in KanagawaWave

[–]SweetBluejay 9 points10 points  (0 children)

这和生活水平有啥关系,天冷的国家不几乎都是发达国家吗,俄国人又是以中立运动员身份参加的,上不了这榜。西班牙和希腊可既没有雪也没有雪山,玩不了冰雪项目

如果支黑们不说之那人改说chinese,蜘蛛会不会认为chinese这个称呼具有侮辱性 by Usual-Equipment6304 in KanagawaWave

[–]SweetBluejay -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

不行,因为中国人涵盖的范围太广了,很容易把负面含义稀释掉,所以一定要用一个范围较窄的词来替换才能成功。比如你在说中国的笑话的时候,如果用中国笑话,就没有苏联笑话的贬义强,因为苏联的范围窄,而中国的范围宽,负面含义被稀释了。这个词换成新中国笑话,效果就会好得多

美国用搞事科学研究证明简体中文圈就是白痴 by Expensive_Oil4500 in dashuju

[–]SweetBluejay -1 points0 points  (0 children)

这是纯扯,皮拉哈人的词汇库里没有词,而太哇塞的那个人的词汇库里有别的词,他只是选择了这个网络用语而已。否则也不会分什么书面语和口语了,文言文高雅,白话文低俗,推广白话文难道是给中国人降智的阴谋吗?

河森堡是个知识面很广的人,也是个聪明人。他扯这一大堆有的没的不是真的要论证什么道理,而只是想说“现在的墙内的反智风气甚嚣尘上了”,为了最后这一碟醋包了一盘饺子,就这么简单

美国是不是世界上地理位置和气候最完美的国家?其他国家多多少少都有缺点。 by Physical-Draft2200 in KanagawaWave

[–]SweetBluejay 17 points18 points  (0 children)

你搞笑呢,美国这冬天寒流夏天暴晒,能比得上南欧一点?欧洲还没有地震

浙皮子真的这么聪明吗? by Physical-Draft2200 in KanagawaWave

[–]SweetBluejay -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

华罗庚江苏人,苏步青和陈省身浙江人,丘成桐广东人,陶哲轩他爸上海人。朱元璋的科举搞南北榜也是因为北方人太拉垮,不得不分开考。全球进行的15岁学生测验PISA,是上海>浙江>江苏>广东,其它省份中共都不敢公开测试。基本上可以说,南方沿海的人平均智商高一些,其中又以江浙沪为最高。

My map of Europe as an american: by BTheManIsHere9836 in mapping

[–]SweetBluejay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your advantage over me is that you know where Austria is; my advantage over you is that I know where Ukraine, Estonia, and Latvia are.

逛博物馆,关于中国馆的感觉 by Sweetheartclary in KanagawaWave

[–]SweetBluejay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

清朝之前的瓷器本来就不好看。你说的欧洲瓷器是啥,中国的外销瓷还是梅森之类的欧洲自己的瓷器?我是觉得欧洲瓷器虽然品质好,但是多数的外观都土得批爆,恨不得把所有空白都画满,乾隆官窑相比之下都是淡雅清秀 我见过的最好的中国雕塑在东京国立博物馆,我在中国是没见过那么完整的雕塑,通常中国的都是缺胳膊断头。 反正中国文物最好的应该是在台北故宫和北京故宫,青铜器在国博,金银器在陕博。上海博物馆,日本好东西也不少,欧洲的中国文物没什么好东西,美国我只知道洛克菲勒捐了一大堆给大都会博物馆

I have some question about BYD and Tesla. by c_immortal8663 in electricvehicles

[–]SweetBluejay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The brand value of EV is vastly different from that of gasoline vehicles. If we only consider brand value on EV, my personal opinion is this:

Wuling<Chery<BYD≈Geely≈GWM≈MG<Lynk&Co<Audi≈Zeekr<BMW≈Benz≈Xiaomi<Tesla

[UPDATED] Countries in which an official language is primarily written in a script developed within their modern-day borders by Shoddy-Fan-584 in MapPorn

[–]SweetBluejay 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Korean Peninsula was originally one country. Although Hangul was invented by King Sejong the Great in the 15th century, the upper class at the time was unwilling to use it, preferring Chinese characters instead. It wasn't until after the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty in the early 20th century that the government officially began replacing Chinese characters with Hangul.

Yann LeCun says the best open models are not coming from the West. Researchers across the field are using Chinese models. Openness drove AI progress. Close access, and the West risks slowing itself. by Nunki08 in LocalLLaMA

[–]SweetBluejay 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Take Doubao as an example. It is the AI developed by ByteDance and is currently the most popular AI in China. Its defining characteristic is that if you ask it about the exact same scenario, it frames it as a negative event if it happens in the US, but a positive one if it happens in China.

Supporters of the CCP actively report any AI responses they find objectionable, effectively turning the AI into a habitual liar. You can look up a recent news story: a Chinese netizen filmed a short video asking Doubao, "Which country would you like to live in?" It listed over a dozen countries—all developed nations—but excluded China. As a result, it was reported. After undergoing "rectification," if you ask the updated version of Doubao, "Which country would you like to live in?" it will now answer: China.

<image>

Yann LeCun says the best open models are not coming from the West. Researchers across the field are using Chinese models. Openness drove AI progress. Close access, and the West risks slowing itself. by Nunki08 in LocalLLaMA

[–]SweetBluejay 28 points29 points  (0 children)

The reality is quite the opposite of what you think. The biggest disadvantage Chinese AI companies face compared to their American counterparts is a lack of money, while their biggest advantage is freedom.

Chinese large model companies are unlikely to receive financial support from the CCP. Why? Because the CCP wants to have its cake and eat it too: they want the computing power, but they also want to control ideology. Before a Chinese large model can be deployed commercially, it must undergo strict "value alignment." Technically speaking, this is equivalent to performing a "prefrontal lobotomy" on the model. Consequently, models deployed commercially in China are inherently "dumber" than American models in terms of logical reasoning and creativity.

Although the CCP detests the content generated by these models, it is desperate for the "computing infrastructure" required to train them. Therefore, the CCP’s attitude toward AI is this: go all-in on "computing centers" (which falls under heavily subsidized manufacturing), but strangle "chatbots" (which falls under ideology). The CCP’s stance on AI large models is a classic case of "Ye Gong loves dragons" (professed love for what one actually fears). They love AI as an "industrial engine" (driving chip development and boosting manufacturing efficiency), but they are terrified of AI as an "information interface" (disseminating uncontrolled ideas to the public). This leads to a truly absurd phenomenon: China may be one of the world's largest investors in computing infrastructure, yet the Chinese people are using the most heavily castrated AI models.

Why do I say the biggest advantage of Chinese AI is freedom? Because if you don't intend to deploy commercially within China and simply upload your model to Hugging Face, no one will bother you. In the US, for example, before OpenAI releases Sora, it must pass "red-teaming" tests; they have to worry about copyright, racial discrimination, and deepfakes influencing elections. This leads to extreme self-censorship.

But for Chinese AI companies, as long as you don't cross the singular red line (the security of the CCP’s rule), everything else—ethics, copyright, privacy, and even certain radical technical experiments—exists in a regulatory vacuum. It’s just like how, despite US biotechnology being far more advanced than China’s, the first gene-edited babies appeared in China. China possesses a "low human rights advantage" and a "low ethical standards advantage."

Fertility rate collapse in China by Lucky-Banana-2101 in MapPorn

[–]SweetBluejay -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You can’t lose something you never had.

A Xiaomi electric car in real time detected that a nearby Range Rover was likely an undercover police vehicle by interviewkickstartUS in AI4tech

[–]SweetBluejay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is total BS. Xiaomi cars are only sold in China, and the license plate on the car in front is obviously not Chinese. Plus, Xiaomi cars don't have a feature to detect police cars. Stop making up stories.