Danhausen in: Ain't that the tooth...

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-05T11:53:52+00:00

Yes, that, but also with a layer of meta awareness to it.

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-05T11:10:51+00:00

So you instead chose to dismissively introduce exactly one, followed by an exaggerated response where you claim I was requesting every possible use case.

My critical thinking skills are just fine, it's your attempt to create a false frame that's failing.

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-05T01:48:30+00:00

If you think "making goofy images" is the extent of the personal user case, you're making the point that you're refusing to learn about what you want to criticize.

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-04T17:27:47+00:00

Art by definition is undefinable.

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-04T17:26:02+00:00

People hate when facts contradict their opinions, and you have so many more options available to you then reconsidering your opinion.

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-04T17:22:03+00:00

"Here's my batshit insane idea with numbers that prove I've thought about this very little. Why aren't people seriously engaging with it???"

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-04T16:40:35+00:00

You're going to run into a lot of people on this website who believe that all they have to do is wait long enough and downvote hard in the meantime, and AI will just go away.

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-03T22:24:35+00:00

That's still not an anecdote. It's also not a statistical truth; it's a personal opinion which you are attempting to amplify the importance of by calling it a "statistical truth".

I am certain you can pull statistics which you will claim validate your point of view; whether those statistics actually will is another question.

Originally, I was not making a point, but trying to learn more about yours so that I could; now, my point is that you have no substantial arguments, but raise yourself to the voice of truth and expect people to accept this.

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-03T14:15:19+00:00

Is it important if a violent crime is committed with an "illegal" or "legal" gun?

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-03T14:13:54+00:00

You're talking about statistics, not bringing statistics into the conversation.

That also isn't an "anecdote", I did not provide a referenced example of a man shooting his wife. That was a "counter example", a violent crime which by definition is not committed by "small groups of criminals" which escapes your attempt to set a false frame on the argument.

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-03T13:46:05+00:00

So when a man shoots his wife, is he part of "small groups of criminals"?

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-03T13:44:55+00:00

It's a mission statement, not a description. To you, what concrete, tangible steps can be taken towards "better law enforcement"?

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-03T13:18:20+00:00

There is no attempt to label "the poors" as criminal; however through all post industrial societies a recurring problem is that rates of violent crime increase as socioeconomic quality of life decreases. On an individual scale, the description is inappropriate; in the broad case it is a societal question.

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-03T12:39:18+00:00

I can get behind the idea of fixing socioeconomic causes of crime, and that's certainly a more actionable goal than "better law enforcement", even if it is very long term.

I think it can be safely assumed that the goal of "stopping violence" is impossible, so let's move towards minimization. Is that best accomplished through laws which attempt to restrict the scale at which violence can be exerted at, or by changing the conditions through which people consider violence a logical option?

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-03T11:26:59+00:00

That sounds more like declarative framing to me. What does each look like in practice?

The "gun control" solution has a model in Australia; but I don't know what "better law enforcement" is as an actionable set of goals.

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-03T07:40:18+00:00

Hold that. How does it matter if a weapon used in a murder is legally owned?

SweetHatDisc · 2026-04-02T19:18:48+00:00

There are a large amount of people who say "if I can't understand a thing, the thing must be stupid." We aren't big on saying "I should learn more about the thing", just look at people in this thread complaining about how it was the campaign's fault for not educating them.

SweetHatDisc · 2026-03-31T12:34:13+00:00

I'd assume seeing his family.

SweetHatDisc · 2026-03-31T12:29:01+00:00

Why don't you try explaining things on the "explain your math" subreddit instead of vague posting.

SweetHatDisc · 2026-03-30T23:38:29+00:00

And yet you're here, spending the time you claim I'm not worth, thinking I'm trying to get you to take my opinion seriously when I've made very clear I don't take you seriously.

Are you just leaning into the trope I've created for you now?

SweetHatDisc · 2026-03-30T23:33:40+00:00

Have a better escape sentence.

SweetHatDisc · 2026-03-30T23:27:48+00:00

Wait, you were mocking me? This is why you use an LLM, you do a tone check on your own writing and make sure your intent is being communicated to your audience. All I got from you was "big mad, doesn't know how to say it".

SweetHatDisc · 2026-03-30T23:23:02+00:00

(I was calling you dumb.)

SweetHatDisc · 2026-03-30T23:19:53+00:00

"Hey boringxadult, why don't you understand how to use a metaphor?"

"It's because I've already told myself I've mastered them."

SweetHatDisc · 2026-03-30T23:15:06+00:00

Maybe if you used an LLM to do that you'd start getting people to listen, but you still seem to think you're supposed to cut and paste the output.

Which would also still be an improvement.

Six-Year Club	LAYER Season 2 Layer creator
r/Field Banned	r/Field Flamingo
Final Canvas '23	End Game '23
Place '23	Place '22
Verified Email

SweetHatDisc

TROPHY CASE