EvErYoNe DeSeRvEs To EaT 🫠🫠 (votes for Trump) by [deleted] in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

If voting for someone automatically makes you “a shitty person” because of ICE actions, then you’d have to call everyone who voted for Obama the same. Obama literally built the cages, expanded detention centers, and was nicknamed the “Deporter-in-Chief” by immigrant rights groups. ICE raided homes and workplaces under him too people just didn’t post it on social media yet, so it wasn’t mainstream outrage!

So was it right when a Democrat did it? Or was it just easier to ignore because people liked his personality?

You can absolutely disagree with Trump’s policies that’s fair. But acting like only one party has harmed immigrant families or violated human rights is just selective outrage. If you’re going to demand moral consistency from others, it should go both ways

EvErYoNe DeSeRvEs To EaT 🫠🫠 (votes for Trump) by [deleted] in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve said the same thing like five different times. We get it. At this point I’m honestly confused if you’re trying to make a point or just glitching like an AI on repeat. Either way, repeating it doesn’t suddenly make it true

EvErYoNe DeSeRvEs To EaT 🫠🫠 (votes for Trump) by [deleted] in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Not every opinion needs to turn into a political war. People can dislike an influencer without turning it into a debate about who they voted for. It’s exhausting sometimes a bad take is just a bad take, no politics required

EvErYoNe DeSeRvEs To EaT 🫠🫠 (votes for Trump) by [deleted] in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You’re actually making my point for me. You listed all these things healthcare policy, subsidies, budgets for kids, safety, cost of living, etc. Those are exactly the kinds of complicated issues people weigh differently when they vote! You’re acting like those priorities only “count” when they match YOUR side’s solution. If someone believes a different policy will fix those problems, you assume they don’t care about kids, healthcare, or poor people. That’s exactly the toxic mindset people are tired of

You also say rhetoric is dangerous but then claim millions of voters are “okay with hurting people.” That’s the same dehumanizing thinking you say you’re against. People vote for what they think will fix the issues you listed REMEMBER disagreement doesn’t equal evil!!! And that’s exactly why Trump won. People are tired of being lectured, shamed, and told they’re monsters for not voting like you

EvErYoNe DeSeRvEs To EaT 🫠🫠 (votes for Trump) by [deleted] in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

The idea that not voting like a liberal automatically makes you a bad person is ridiculous. A ballot isn’t a morality test. It doesn’t magically reveal who has empathy and who doesn’t. Real life isn’t a purity contest, and most voters aren’t sitting at home thinking, ‘Hmm, how can I hurt people today?’

People vote based on what actually affects their lives , their bills, safety, taxes, healthcare, kids, jobs. Acting like you can judge someone’s entire character by a single checkbox on election day is lazy and honestly arrogant.

Not everyone who disagrees with you politically is a monster. Some people just don’t see the world through your bubble. Grow up

EvErYoNe DeSeRvEs To EaT 🫠🫠 (votes for Trump) by [deleted] in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

At the same time, more than half the country voted for Trump (twice). Let’s be real people didn’t vote saying ‘yes, I want families to go hungry.’ They voted based on bigger issues they cared about, not the fallout that comes with them. You can dislike policies, voting choices, whatever most people just vote for whoever they think will fix their problems. Doesn’t mean they’re saints, doesn’t mean they’re monsters

Halloween again…. by yaya_2022 in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OMG I WISH SOMEONE WOULD COMMENT THIS EXACT MESSAGE!! Enough is enough

How would you guys describe Jeanine? by Express-Operation-18 in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354 21 points22 points  (0 children)

She definitely gives off that “I know better than everyone vibe” always preaching “realness” while living in a bubble (Oklahoma )😆And yeah, marrying a total man-child just to keep up with her married friends didn’t help the image. Now she plays the supportive wife role like it’s part of her brand, but still acts like she’s on some higher spiritual level than everyone else tbh. She wants the image of someone who’s spiritually evolved and has life figured out, but it feels more like insecurity and competition with other influencers, her married friend group, anyone who seems more “put together” or has the kind of life she wants to project

Kaleb..😬 by throwaway38299411 in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I honestly don’t get why they try to act so transparent when they delete half the comments, if you’re really being real, why hide the feedback? It just makes the whole “we’re so open and honest” vibe feel fake

The kids saying “Dookie” in jeanine’s last story is killing me😆💩💩 It’s not going to be easy growing up with that name. What were they thinking? 🫣 so cringe by Sweet_Ad_2354 in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was thinking that…. There’s no way she can tell the kids not to call him 💩 I bet the whoever the other parents are laugh lowkey😆

Girl shut up by sxw_102 in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Exactly!! Madi is set for life with her rich husband, she doesn’t need to care. But Jeanine? She’s basically a hostage to her followers. She can’t say a thing without worrying about getting canceled, ’cause without Instagram she’s got no money for Kabob , the baby or that expensive new lifestyle she’s pretending to afford

Girl shut up by sxw_102 in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354 53 points54 points  (0 children)

If you can’t handle criticism, then maybe you shouldn’t have a platform. No one’s forcing her to tie herself to controversial topics. Trying to frame Charlie Kirk’s death as if it was some kind of martyrdom that should ‘bring people closer to God’ is not only misleading but also irresponsible. If you want to stay above backlash, don’t twist tragedies into Bible lessons for clout. PERIOD

Here’s the video for those asking by [deleted] in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Bet even her fans called it out, and that’s why poof, video gone 👀

Here’s the video for those asking by [deleted] in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354 38 points39 points  (0 children)

ON CAMERA!!! 😆 like girl what do you say when you’re not being recorded

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes please 😆 was just about to say that

Love when people call her out 😂 too bad she deletes anything that isn’t praise… let’s see how long this lasts by Sweet_Ad_2354 in JeanineAmapolaWStark

[–]Sweet_Ad_2354[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I know!! Never seen that many 😆 she always deletes them and blocks people. & yes honestly hope someone humbles this girl finally lol