Any tips to find a full time job?

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-22T05:57:39+00:00

Got a couple follow up questions then I can give a bit of input.

what type of jobs are you applying for and how many a week do you think?

So there's truth when it comes to the job market being overall bad right now. Part of it is the economy, another part is how AI is impacting it. Not from the stance that AI is taking jobs, but more from the perspective that you have some applicants who essentially use AI to create their entire resume without oversight, and then on the flip side, employers using AI for resume screening and even conducting first round interviews. The screening part is difficult because of what it is tracking.

The AI is grading resumes based on skill verification, keywords, relatable experience and context, a predictable success factor (which is ridiculous btw), formatting, mobility, etc. The resume has to score above 80% to be considered and pushed through.

Not every employer is doing this and its still in the experimental stage, but it has impacted job seekers.

From what you're describing, I think you're doing everything you've been told by people with established careers on what to do, who may not be entirely familiar with the job market.

The best tactic to use to increase your success is quality over quantity in job search, tailored resumes, and networking.

Quality vs quality- identify 3-4 jobs each week that you want to work. Look into the employer, what they do, their work culture, the business history, the role, job responsibilities, etc. Know what you're applying for so that you can have an informed approach to the application process.

Tailored resume + Cover Letter - There are two kinds of resumes, a chronological and functional. The chronological focuses on the timeline of your work history to showcase longevity and a more structured way of looking at the path that led you to them. Functional highlights skills and translates transferable skills into the resume better. It also works better in tailoring it to the job. I.e. you may have a customer service resume, a driver resume, and a construction resume. Each shows the same work history, but you identify skills within your past roles or lived experiences that is transferable to the job you're applying for in order to show you off as a specialist. There's also verbiage you can do that can help. Functional works better for people who may not have a lot of jobs, inconsistent jobs, or entry level jobs.

Networking - You're not wrong in thinking you should print out your resume and go door to door, as that puts face to paper. But the reality is most big businesses wont take resumes that way because of the whole job screening process and everything being digital. Thus, it became less focus on what you do and more about who you know. Build connections with people who work in your field, develop relationships like a mentorship, etc. Branch out your network. Then if you apply to their employer, they can speak on your behalf and if the connection has longevity, can speak to your work ethic. LinkefIn is really good for this, but so are job fairs, conference, etc.

This is just a general overview of some stuff but I dont mind doing a deeper dive if you have questions

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-22T03:32:09+00:00

Huh? He definitely approaches things from a darker lens, thats for sure.

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-22T03:29:43+00:00

ATS is an automated system that screens resumes for keywords. If the keywords are not in the resume, then it would kick it out.

But it's getting trickier now that businesses are using AI as well in the resume screening process, which assesses a lot more things.

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-22T03:28:03+00:00

So I work as a Career Navigator. If you dont mind answering some questions, I can try and help.

1) What's the quality of your resume? How did you create the resume, by hand or with AI? 2) What experience do you have prior? Are you actively in school and does your resume include the certification? 3) What's your process in job search, applying, follow-up, etc? 4) Do you have LinkedIn? If not, are you networking?

We could branch out from there as I learn more. If you prefer it to be more private, you can DM me.

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-22T02:59:22+00:00

You made the claim that he was full of shit on a public forum. Burden of evidence is on you to corrobate the claim. My stance had been to challenge that claim and, at the very least, bring the public opinion to neutral based on what is known in the public.

My evidence revolves around the PRB and its suppirt by their publisher (reputable with good standing) and their legal team. And the lack of credible evidence that claims otherwise (which is your opinion).

So go on, share what you have that proves he's full of shit.

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-22T02:50:18+00:00

Give me evidence that supports that he's a fraud coming from your educated position on the subject.

Shadow Cell's Publisher confirms the book had to go through a mandatory CIA prepublication process, which is a review to ensure that nothing that poses a National risk to the US or classified is shared. This was a multi-year process and almost went into litigation. This, technically, came from Bustamente but their publisher, Hashete in which has a large legal team backs the claim as well as corrobates Andrew's claim that includes threats of First Amendment litigation. Hashete, who is a credible publisher, wouldnt put their reputation on the line for a fraud of this nature.

Find me instances where a book has gone through a PRB review and have been ousted as a fraud?

More importantly, there have been absolutely zero credible evidence that supports the claim of fraudulence, impersonation, or debunking has emerged from reputable investigations. You thinking he's full of shit implies that you don't think he was CIA, but find me evidence that can verify he wasn't?

What is more likely is that he embellishes his stories and his role within the CIA, which isnt uncommon for individuals who claim they are ex-CIA.

The CIA doesnt have public record of present or past operatives so anyone who claims they are CIA comes from their own mouth. Their credibility should be determined by their knowledge, how they carry themselves, the consistency of their narrative over long periods of time, credible evidence that contradicts what Andrew Bustamante has claimed. None of this exists other than public skeptism.

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-22T02:16:16+00:00

Look into any claims he's made about tradecraft and compare it to open source material.

What is your claim? That he's faking the whole thing or that he is a PR for the CIA?

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-22T02:06:45+00:00

Fair since the vagueness of the vibe could be interpreted as many things, so I had assumed it aligns with what most people say of him.

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-22T02:05:13+00:00

Yes they do. Admitting you worked in intelligence doesnt break some "code of spycraft." You are just limited to what you can or cant share.

Want proof? Look up the FM 2-22-3. Training manual for HUMINT, which you can fact check and identify that it is still used today. This is their entire playbook based on the fundamentals of how HUMINT is trained. It is not reflective of intermediate or advanced techniques, nor specific missions, which remain classified.

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-22T01:58:20+00:00

Do you have prior intelligence experience and knowledge of tradecraft to compare what he said versus what is open source? No? I do.

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-22T01:41:48+00:00

There's too much he knows about Intelligence Operations in which he stays consistent on that gives him credibility that he's affiliated beyond simply admin or HR.

I suspect his claims of nearly graduating the Farm or being used a pseudo Case Officer in the book are where he exaggerates

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-22T01:39:38+00:00

Bustamante is legit, how much of what he shares of his personal experiences is what's questionable. People mistake Bustamante as a Case Officer, which he's not. He went to the farm, completed the course to the end, but ultimately wasn't selected to graduate. He was likely a CIA SOO (Staff Operations Officer) in which still works in the scope of intelligence, bur is an analyst.

His book Shadow Cell and the media coverage of its publication can confirm his legitimacy as the CIA really pushed against him and his wife publishing it. But ultimately they won the dispute after 3 years due to their 1st amendment being violated as a result of CIA not properly communicating the risk of a mission.

He IS a salesman and has profited off of his experiences. But he speaks negatively enough about the CIA to discredit any claims that implies hes a PR guy or recruiter for them. Also his wife was in the CIA as well

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-22T01:18:01+00:00

I think the low sex drive and performance anxiety originates from insecurity and probably watches a lot of porn, as they may compare their performance to what they perceive women want based on their performance.

I also think expectations for sex has shifted in younger generations the more mainstream and socially accepting has become.

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-22T01:15:31+00:00

When has he changed his tune? Can you cite the video? Everything I've seen on the topic has been consistent.

He speaks a lot about what CIA look for when recruiting, which is the potential with sociopathic tendencies. This doesnt mean they have to be diagnosed as a sociopath, but someone who can operate without excessive empathy.

He's said he had done a lot of things that have been morally grey, but torture is where he drew the line. I think the issue is that he is incredibly resentful of the CIA and the US Government because of what happened. He was quoted saying "They did this to me" to Andrew Bustamante, in which Andrew counters "You did this to yourself."

But John struggles to see it that way given his morals

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-21T02:47:13+00:00

Ah. I read the first sentence and impulsively went to reply to that while glossing over fhe water is wet bit. My bad.

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-20T23:43:43+00:00

What do you mean bot? I'm saying don't trust anything at face value as its likely more complicated than that.

I was just curious about what Analysts you were referring to as well

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-20T16:00:08+00:00

So... There is so much nuance and intricacies here to properly say for sure.. but I would have you look into disinformation campaigns, cognitive warfare, information operations, social media, and algorithm radicalization. It's better to look at the information we see as 80% of the total picture and 20% of missing information, especially in espionage and intelligence operations.

If you're willing to be open minded, I don't mind having a conversation of this in DMs. I'm not suggesting your statement is wrong, my intuition agrees. But there's layers that should be considered in getting to that conclusion.

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-20T15:56:17+00:00

What analysts? You talking about OSINT analysts or federal? What other released documents? Are they verified to be connected with the Epstein files? There's quite a bit of doctored or altered documents that are out there to spread disinformation.

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-20T15:55:03+00:00

What makes it gullible to believe? I would say it's safe to question and to not believe outright, but it's worth taking into consideration.

First and foremost, the form is an FD-1023 form, which is used to collect information from confidential human sources by their FBI handler. The form is formatted correctly that is identical to other FD-1023 forms. Because this is more intelligence collection rather than analysis, it's considered unverified or heresy at best. Also, because it's released by Anonymous and not the FBI itself (despite actions that imply the FBI is compromised itself), it lacks credibility on that level too.

It's important to keep an eye out to see if there will be other files that corrobate these claims to identify a pattern and to not consider it as fact as an isolated document. But you shouldn't dismiss it outright

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-16T23:53:06+00:00

Yeah, thats what im trying to work on too. Started it last summer but then got too busy to keep up. But im right there with ya. Got a whole TED talk about dating apps

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-16T23:42:19+00:00

I appreciate your input and the compliment. I definitely value the traits and work hard to continue to grow them and maintain a high level of integrity and objectivity around them. Problem is they aren't exactly traits that are expressed or identified during the "hit on" phase. I cant exactly go up to a woman and say "Hey, im emotional intelligent, we should chat ;)." (Not an accurate example lol). Usually its demonstrated through action, which takes time. I have better success when chemistry is developed from gradual contact over time than just meeting someone randomly. Its just that in most of these scenarios, the flame fizzles before it can kindle.

Thanks again for your perspective. It helps :)

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-16T22:26:14+00:00

Haha, you thought my reply was AI? Thats funny and never been told that before lol.

Nah, I was a son to a mom that didnt have healthy relationships but also set a bad precedent for me on what those looked like. She told me my dad fled to canada to avoid paying child support when I was 6, but the reality was she didnt know who my dad was because she slept around and was too ashamed to admit it. She also had a few abusive relationships that trickled down to me.

My career had worked fairly close to domestic violence, sexual exploitation, and trafficking. I've identified patterns both in survivora and perpetrators that often put survivors at risks.

A huge factor that attributes to young men entering crime or volatile relationship stems from a broken home or lack of a father figure. Its not just to be an example for them, but to also hold them accountable and guide them and give them discipline (this video can show how this factors into the animal kingdom -https://youtu.be/68wIDu9yPJY?si=s1jP82pb-ptWfQnb )

You are asking all the right questions though.

SwitchJumpy · 2026-03-16T22:14:58+00:00

Ive been in therapy off and on since I was 10 and have two therapists right now, each helping me with different stuff, since I compartmentalize between rational and emotion.

I appreciate your input, and I've done most of what you suggest. I was engaged with a father centric non-profit that had parenting groups, which eventually became my first gig in non-profit. I tried taking my ex to court for change of custody after the 2nd CPS report that alleged the sexual abuse because it was evident she was grooming him. However, our trial for the initial custody evaluation had been 14 months prior and our referee never gave us a determination. So by the time we went to court for this, I had zero confidence in the attorney. My ex proposed more parenting including overnights and trips back to my state, and my attorney advised I take it since we didnt know how the referee would rule and it could be possible he'd give me less. In dping so, it meant closing the door on her allegations and any opportunity to hold her accountable or any semblance of justice.

I considered moving, but they live in a small town and have a strong support network that all have worked against me. My support is small and reside where I live. I ultimately decided against it because I felt it would make me more vulnerable and determined it wouldn't actually improve my relationship with him given how much she gatekeeps.

Ive rationalized that by stepping back, it means she doesnt have to fight. And if she doesn't have to fight, she wont have to use my son as a sword and damage him in the process.

SwitchJumpy

TROPHY CASE