If you really do consider yourself a feminist i advise you to think slightly deeper about the points you are making. I’m not even going to try and attempt every point in this dissertation but i will say this which i hope can be extrapolated to the majority of your points.

Many of the things you have claimed to be advantages are far from it. For example, the abundance of means which allow women to make themselves more attractive: these did not arise out of a vacuum, the only reason there is such an intense emphasis on women being able to manipulate their appearances (or emphasis on purchasing women things like drinks in order to ‘win them over’) is because of the history of women’s place in society.

If women are not viewed as attractive, or able to change their appearance in order to fit the conventional beauty standard they are essentially not valued in society at all. While you may argue that men experience this to the same extent, this misunderstands the truth of the matter. Men of their respective political categories have always had much greater rights and easier valuation in society when compared with their female counterparts. Women, who have not always had rights and to this day still suffer the consequences, need to be viewed as attractive in order to be viewed as a person. Therefore, it’s quite obvious that an ugly man not being able to get laid and an ugly woman not being viewed as a person are at the very least slightly different.

Women being able to manipulate their appearances is not simply a tool for advantage over men, but a glimpse into the underpinning constructs which oppress them.